Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
Language and Content Outcomes of CLIL and EMI: A Systematic Review
dc.contributor.author | Mathew Graham, Keith | |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, Yunkyeong | |
dc.contributor.author | Davoodi, Amin | |
dc.contributor.author | Razmeh, Shakiba | |
dc.contributor.author | L. Quentin, Dixon | |
dc.date.accessioned | 11/1/2018 11:45 | |
dc.date.available | 11/1/2018 11:45 | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Agustín-Llach, M. P. (2016). Age and type of instruction (CLIC vs. Traditional EFL) in lexical development. International Journal of English Studies, 16(1), 75-96. | es_CO |
dc.identifier.citation | Agustín-Llach, M. P. (2017). The effects of the CLIL approach in young foreign language learners' lexical profiles. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20(5), 557-573. doi:10.1080/13670050.2015.1103208 | es_CO |
dc.identifier.citation | Arribas, M. (2016). Analysing a whole CLIL school: Students' attitudes, motivation, and receptive vocabulary outcomes. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 9(2), 267-292. doi:10.5294/ laclil.2016.9.2.2 | es_CO |
dc.identifier.citation | Basterrechea, M., & del Pilar García Mayo, M. (2014). Dictogloss and the production of the English third person "-s" by CLIL and mainstream EFL learners: A comparative study. International Journal of English Studies, 14(2), 77-98. | es_CO |
dc.identifier.citation | Binterová, H., Petrášková, V., & Komínková, O. (2014). The CLIL method versus pupils’ results in solving mathematical word problems. The New Educational Review, 38(4), 238-249. | es_CO |
dc.identifier.citation | Bruton, A. (2011). Are the differences between CLIL and non-CLIL groups in Andalusia due to CLIL? A reply to Lorenzo, Casal and Moore (2010). Applied Linguistics, 32(2), 236-241. doi:10.1093/applin/amr007 | es_CO |
dc.identifier.citation | Canga Alonso, A. (2015a). Receptive vocabulary of CLIL and Non-CLIL primary and secondary school learners. Complutense Journal of English Studies, 23, 59-77. doi:10.5209/rev_CJES.2015.v23.51301 | es_CO |
dc.identifier.citation | Canga Alonso, A. (2015b). The receptive vocabulary size of Spanish 5th grade primary school students in CLIL and Non-CLIL instruction. ES Revista de Filología Inglesa, 36, 63-85. | es_CO |
dc.identifier.citation | Coral, J., Lleixà, T., & Ventura, C. (2018). Foreign language competence and content and language integrated learning in multilingual schools in Catalonia: An ex post facto study analysing the results of state key competences testing. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(2), 139-150. doi:10.1080/13670050.2016.1143445 | es_CO |
dc.identifier.citation | Cummins, J. (1984). Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. | es_CO |
dc.identifier.citation | Dafouz, E., Camacho, M., & Urquia, E. (2014). 'Surely they can't do as well': A comparison of business students' academic performance in English-medium and Spanish-as-first-language-medium programmes. Language and Education, 18(3), 223-236. doi:10.1080/09500782.2013.808661 | es_CO |
dc.identifier.citation | Eurydice. (2006). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) at school in Europe. Brussels: Eurydice. Retrieved from http://www.indire.it/lucabas/lkmw_file/eurydice/CLIL_EN.pdf | es_CO |
dc.identifier.citation | Fung, D., & Yip, V. (2014). The effects of the medium of instruction in certificate-level physics on achievement and motivation to learn. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(10), 1219-1245. doi:10.1002/tea.21174 | es_CO |
dc.identifier.citation | Gené-Gil, M., Juan-Garau, M., & Salazar-Noguera, J. (2015). Development of EFL writing over three years in secondary education: CLIL and non-CLIL settings. The Language Learning Journal, 43(3), 286-303. doi:10.1080/09571736.2015.1053278 | es_CO |
dc.identifier.citation | Georgiou, S. I. (2012). Reviewing the puzzle of CLIL. ELT Journal, 66(4), 495-504. | es_CO |
dc.identifier.citation | Gierlinger, E., & Wagner, T. (2016). The more the merrier- Revisiting CLIL-based vocabulary growth in secondary education. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 9(1), 37-63. doi:10.5294/laclil.2016.9.1.3 | es_CO |
dc.identifier.citation | Goris, J., Denessen, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2013). Effects of the Content and Language Integrated Learning approach to EFL teaching: A comparative study. Written Language and Literacy, 16(2), 186-207. doi:10.1075/wll.16.2.03gor | es_CO |
dc.identifier.citation | Hernandez-Nanclares, N., & Jimenez-Munoz, A. (2017). English as a medium of instruction: Evidence for language and content targets in bilingual education in economics. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20(7), 883-896. doi:10.1080/13670050.2015.1125847 | es_CO |
dc.identifier.citation | Krashen, S.D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York: Longman. | es_CO |
dc.identifier.citation | Lazaro Ibarrola, A. (2012). Faster and further morphosyntactic development of CLIL vs. EFL Basque-Spanish bilinguals learning English in high-school. International Journal of English Studies, 12(1), 79-96. | es_CO |
dc.identifier.citation | Lightbown, P. M. (2014). Focus on content-based language teaching. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford. | es_CO |
dc.identifier.citation | Lorenzo, F., Casal, S., & Moore, P. (2010). The effects of Content and Language Integrated Learning in European education: Key findings from the Andalusian Bilingual Sections Evaluation Project. Applied Linguistics, 31(3), 418-442. doi:10.1093/applin/amp041 | es_CO |
dc.identifier.citation | Manzano Vázquez, B. (2014). Lexical transfer in the written production of a CLIL group and a non-CLIL group. International Journal of English Studies, 14(2), 57-76. | es_CO |
dc.identifier.citation | Maxwell-Reid, C. (2010). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): The influence of studying through English on Spanish students' first-language written discourse. Text & Talk, 30(6), 679-699. doi:10.1515/TEXT.2010.033 | es_CO |
dc.identifier.citation | Mesquida, F., & Juan-Garau, M. (2013). CLIL instruction and its effects on the development of negotiation strategies. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies, 47, 125-144. | es_CO |
dc.identifier.citation | Moore, P. (2011). Collaborative interaction in turn-taking: A comparative study of European bilingual (CLIL) and mainstream (MS) foreign language learners in early secondary education. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 14(5), 531-549. doi:10.1080/13670050.2010.537741 | es_CO |
dc.identifier.citation | Neghina, C. (2017). Asia Rising. Retrieved from http://www.studyportals.com/intelligence/asia-rising/ | es_CO |
dc.identifier.citation | Ouazizi, K. (2016). The effects of CLIL education on the subject matter (mathematics) and the target language (English). Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 9(1), 110-137. doi:10.5294/laclil.2016.9.1.5 | es_CO |
dc.identifier.citation | Piesche, N., Jonkmann, K., Fiege, C., & Keßler, J. (2016). CLIL for all? A randomised controlled field experiment with sixth-grade students on the effects of content and language integrated science learning. Learning and Instruction, 44, 108-116. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.04.001 | es_CO |
dc.identifier.citation | Rallo Fabra, L., & Juan-Garau, M. (2011). Assessing FL pronunciation in a semi-immersion setting: The effects of CLIL instruction on Spanish-Catalan learners' perceived comprehensibility and accentedness. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 47(1), 96-108. doi:10.2478/psicl-2011-0008 | es_CO |
dc.identifier.citation | Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4 | es_CO |
dc.identifier.citation | Xanthou, M. (2011). The impact of CLIL on L2 vocabulary development and content knowledge. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10(4), 116-126. | es_CO |
dc.identifier.citation | Yang, W. (2015). Content and Language Integrated Learning next in Asia: Evidence of learners' achievement in CLIL education from a Taiwan tertiary degree programme. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18(4), 361-382. doi:10.1080/13670050.2014.904840 | es_CO |
dc.identifier.citation | Zhao, J., & Dixon, L. Q. (2017). English-medium Instruction in Chinese universities: Perspectives, discourse and evaluation. New York: Routledge. | es_CO |
dc.identifier.issn | 2011-6721 | |
dc.identifier.other | http://laclil.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/LACLIL/article/view/9268 | |
dc.identifier.other | http://laclil.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/LACLIL/article/view/9268/pdf | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10818/34353 | |
dc.description | 20 páginas | es_CO |
dc.description.abstract | Around the world, language teachers are shifting to content-based instruction (CBI) as a way to teach English, most commonly in the form of Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) or English-Medium Instruction (EMI). With the spread of CBI around the world, it is important to understand how this shift in teaching has affected student outcomes. Using a systematic literature review approach, this study examines current literature on the effect of CBI on language and content outcomes. Twenty-five articles met the inclusion criteria for this study and were examined. The results show mixed findings on the effectiveness of CBI on student outcomes, with the majority of studies showing either positive or neutral effects for CBI when compared with non-CBI classrooms. However, the study also reveals multiple methodological issues that cause difficulties for any strong conclusions about CBI to be made. In addition, while CLIL in Spain has received a lot of research attention, other countries remain understudied. Therefore, this study concludes with a call for future research of CBI outcomes that examine a variety of countries and account for the methodological flaws identified. | en |
dc.format | application/pdf | es_CO |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_CO |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | LACLIL > Vol 11, No 1 (2018) p. 19-37 | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.source | instname:Universidad de La Sabana | es_CO |
dc.source | reponame:Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de La Sabana | es_CO |
dc.subject.other | Content and language integrated learning | eng |
dc.subject.other | English-medium instruction | eng |
dc.subject.other | Language outcomes | eng |
dc.subject.other | Content outcomes | eng |
dc.subject.other | Systematic review | eng |
dc.title | Language and Content Outcomes of CLIL and EMI: A Systematic Review | en |
dc.type | journal article | es_CO |
dc.publisher.department | Dirección de Publicaciones | es_CO |
dc.type.hasVersion | publishedVersion | es_CO |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.5294/laclil.2018.11.1.2 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2322-9721 |