Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNieto Navia, Rafael
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-02T09:32:22Z
dc.date.available2015-02-02T09:32:22Z
dc.date.created2005
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.otherhttp://personaybioetica.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/personaybioetica/article/view/904es_CO
dc.identifier.otherhttp://personaybioetica.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/personaybioetica/article/view/904/985es_CO
dc.identifier.otherhttp://personaybioetica.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/personaybioetica/article/view/904/2242es_CO
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/13951
dc.description22 páginas
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this article is proving that the wrongfully called “monitoring committees” of the treaties dealing with the protection of human rights being ratified by Colombia are neither entitled nor empowered to bind or oblige the country in any way, and that their recommendations - on which the demand against abortion penalization is based - have no constitutional status whatsoever. And that, in contrast, the substantive right in these treaties establishes an obligation to respect life from the very moment of conception. For this purpose, an analysis is made of article 93 of the Colombian Constitution, whereby it is ordered that treaties/agreements dealing with human rights shall prevail in the internal order while serving to construe the constitutional rules. The meaning of the words “treaty [“tratado”] or agreement” [“convenio”](*) is defined, while determining when can they be deemed to be classifiable under article 93 and how can they be construed within the framework of international law. Then, in the light of this interpretation, the treaties are examined as well as the role of committees, to finally conclude that - based on these recommendations - the Constitutional Court cannot declare unenforceable article 122 of the Criminal Code [“Código Penal”], which penalizes induced or artificial abortion.
dc.description.abstractEl propósito de este artículo es el de demostrar que los mal llamados “comités de monitoreo” de los tratados de protección a los derechos humanos, que ha ratificado Colombia, no tienen facultades para obligar al país, ni sus recomendaciones –en las que se basa la demanda– tienen rango constitucional, y que, en cambio, el derecho sustantivo de esos tratados obliga a respetar la vida desde el momento de la concepción. Para ello se analiza el artículo 93 de la Constitución, que ordena que los tratados de derechos humanos prevalezcan en el orden interno y sirvan para interpretar las normas constitucionales. Se determina el sentido de las palabras “tratado o convenio” y cuándo ellos califican para el artículo 93. Luego se estudia cómo se interpretan en el derecho internacional y, a la luz de esa interpretación, se analizan los tratados y el papel de los comités, para concluir que la Corte constitucional no puede –con base en esas recomendaciones– declarar inexequible el artículo 122 del Código Penal, que penaliza el aborto provocado.
dc.language.isospaes_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPersona y Bioética; Vol 9, No 1 (2005)
dc.rightsThis journal and its contents are the property of Universidad de La Sabana and, therefore, may be accessed solely for reading or printing, as a personal copy, but not for profit. Prior authorization from Universidad de La Sabana is required for any other use, such as the reproduction, transformation, public communication or distribution of said material for a profit.The names and email addresses included in Aquichán shall be used solely for the declared purposes of this journal and shall not be made available for any other purpose or to any other person.The articles published in this journal represent the opinions of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the official position of Universidad de La Sabana.
dc.rightsA presente revista e seu conteúdo são propriedade da Universidade da Sabana e, consequentemente, só poderá se aceder a ela para leitura ou impressão, como cópia pessoal e sem fins lucrativos. Qualquer outra forma de utilização como reprodução, transformação, comunicação pública ou distribuição, com fins lucrativos, requer a autorização prévia da Universidade da Sabana.Os nomes e endereços de e-mail introduzidos nesta revista se usarão exclusivamente para os fins declarados e não estarão disponíveis para nenhum outro propósito ou outra pessoa.Os artigos que esta revista contém representam a opinião de seus autores e não constituem necessariamente a opinião da Universidade da Sabana.
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.sourceRepositorio Institucional de la Universidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.subjectAborto
dc.subjectEmbrión
dc.subjectDerechos humanos
dc.subjectDerecho a la vida
dc.subjectConvención de Viena
dc.subjectEstado de excepción
dc.titleAspectos internacionales de la demanda contra la penalización del abortoes_CO
dc.typearticlees_CO
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record