Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Intensive readings to develop the use of language of learning (CLIL): an action research on science content classes

dc.contributor.advisorTernent de Samper, Ana María
dc.contributor.authorParroquiano Rojas, Patricia
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-19T14:58:17Z
dc.date.available2020-05-19T14:58:17Z
dc.date.issued2020-04-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/41114
dc.description124 páginases_CO
dc.description.abstractTeniendo en cuenta la importancia de la enseñanza del lenguaje y del contenido en los colegios bilingües, se hace inminente ofrecer a los docentes las herramientas y el entrenamiento necesario para proporcionar no solo la enseñanza del contenido, sino también la del idioma. El propósito de esta investigación acción es determinar los efectos del uso de lecturas intensivas en las clases de Ciencias Naturales como una estrategia para ayudar a los profesores de contenido a mejorar sus prácticas pedagógicas al integrar el lenguaje, más específicamente el vocabulario especializado, a la vez que se enseña el contenido. El estudio se realizó con un grupo de siete profesores de Ciencias Naturales con un nivel B1-B2 (MCER) L2 en inglés. Los participantes enfrentaron dificultades al tratar de incorporar la instrucción del idioma en sus lecciones de contenido. Los datos se recopilaron de cinco instrumentos: hojas de trabajo de lecturas Intensive Readings, IRs (por sus siglas en inglés), lista de verificación de las planeaciones, observaciones a clases, cuestionario y el diario del investigador. Los resultados revelaron que los IRs influyeron en la enseñanza del lenguaje del aprendizaje, que es el vocabulario especializado que se necesita en sus clases de Ciencias: los maestros evidenciaron una transición de usar las lecturas solo para enseñar el contenido a usar las lecturas para introducir también el vocabulario especializado, también hubo una inclusión intencional del vocabulario especializado y, por último, los profesores participantes entendieron del valor de compartir estrategias de enseñanza durante las sesiones de implementación. Tales hallazgos proporcionaron las razones para obtener la categoría principal: el avance potencial de la enseñanza de vocabulario especializado.es_CO
dc.description.abstractThe pathway of this enriching academic journey has been full of bumps and turns which have convinced me that I am not hardwired for independence. Gladly, I must declare my dependency, and even though this might sound as a weakness, it was truly my strength. I have learned that I needed my family to cheer me up along the way; I understood that my professors were an invaluable source of strength and wisdom, and I realized that my colleagues provided me with the motivation to keep on learning. Also, I am most grateful to my fellow classmates for their unselfish support, and especially to my friend, Adriana, who was always there for me. I would like to thank my mom and dad for praying for me, but most of all, I would like to thank my God Almighty who has always blessed my path and has taught me to always claim my dependence on Him.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.sourcereponame:Intellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.subjectLenguaje y lenguas -- Estudio y enseñanzaes_CO
dc.subjectVocabularioes_CO
dc.subjectPlanificación educativaes_CO
dc.subjectPersonal docentees_CO
dc.subjectFormación profesional de maestroses_CO
dc.titleIntensive readings to develop the use of language of learning (CLIL): an action research on science content classeses_CO
dc.typemasterThesises_CO
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomoes_CO
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjerases_CO
dc.identifier.local277047
dc.identifier.localTE10665
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_CO
dc.creator.degreeMagister en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomoes_CO
dcterms.referencesAiello, J., Di Martino, E., & Di Sabato, B. (2017). Preparing teachers in Italy for CLIL: Reflections on assessment, language proficiency and willingness to communicate. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2015.1041873eng
dcterms.referencesAkbari, O., & Razavi, A. (2015). Using authentic materials in the foreign language classrooms: teachers’ perspectives in EFL classes. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2015.1189eng
dcterms.referencesAlcaraz-Marmol, G. (2018). Trained and non-trained language teachers on CLIL methodology: Teachers’ facts and opinions about the CLIL approach in the primary education context in Spain. LACLIL, 11(1), 39–64. https://doi.org/10.5294/LACLIL.2018.11.1.3eng
dcterms.referencesAldridge, J. (2005). Among the periodicals: Improving vocabulary instruction. Childhood Education, 81(5), 306–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2005.10521314eng
dcterms.referencesAlqahtani, M. (2015). The importance of vocabulary in language learning and how to be taught. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 3(3), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.20472/te.2015.3.3.002eng
dcterms.referencesAugust, D., Carlo, M., Dressler, C., & Snow, C. (2005). The critical role of vocabulary development for English language learners. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice (Vol. 20)eng
dcterms.referencesBaecher, L., Farnsworth, T., & Ediger, A. (2014). The challenges of planning language objectives in content-based ESL instruction. Language Teaching Research, 18(1), 118–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813505381eng
dcterms.referencesBanegas, D. L. (2011). Integrating content and language in English language teaching in secondary education: Models, benefits, and challenges. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 111–136. Retrieved from http://www.ssllt.amu.edu.pleng
dcterms.referencesBanegas, D. L. (2015). Sharing views of CLIL lesson planning in language teacher education. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning Banegas LaCLIL, 8(2), 104–130. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2015.8.2.3eng
dcterms.referencesBarcroft, J. (2009). Effects of synonym generation on incidental and intentional L2 vocabulary learning during reading. TESOL Quarterly, 43(1), 79–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545- 7249.2009.tb00228.xeng
dcterms.referencesBeck, I. L., Mckeown, M. G., & Mccaslin, E. S. (1983). Vocabulary development: All contexts are not created equal. The Elementary School Journal, 83(3), 177–181. https://doi.org/10.1086/461307eng
dcterms.referencesBerardo, S. A. (2006). The use of authentic materials in the teaching of reading. The Reading Matrix. An International Online Journal (Vol. 6). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237413136eng
dcterms.referencesBernard, H. R., Wutich, A., & Ryan, G. W. (2016). Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. SAGE publications.eng
dcterms.referencesBorg, S. (2001). The research journal: a tool for promoting and understanding researcher development. Language Teaching Research, 5(2), 156–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880100500204eng
dcterms.referencesBrown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed). Pearson Education.eng
dcterms.referencesBryan, S. (2011). Extensive reading, narrow reading and second language learners: implications for libraries. The Australian Library Journal, 60(2), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049670.2011.10722583eng
dcterms.referencesBurns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.eng
dcterms.referencesBurns, A. (2009). Doing action research in English language teaching. A guide for practitioners. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.06.005eng
dcterms.referencesButler, Y. G. (2004). What level of English proficiency do elementary school teachers need to attain to teach EFL? Case studies from Korea, Taiwan, and Japan. TESOL Quarterly, 38(2), 245. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588380eng
dcterms.referencesCain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2004). Individual differences in the inference of word meanings from context: the influence of reading comprehension, vocabulary knowledge, and memory capacity. Article in Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 671–681. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.671eng
dcterms.referencesCammarata, L., & Tedick, D. J. (2012). Balancing content and language in instruction: The experience of immersion teachers. The Modern Language Journal Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01330.xeng
dcterms.referencesCarrell, P. L., & Carson, J. G. (1997). Extensive and intensive reading in an EAP setting. English for Specific Purposes, 16(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00031-2eng
dcterms.referencesCasal, S. (2008). Cooperative learning in CLIL contexts: ways to improve students’ competences in the foreign language classroom. Cooperative Learning in Multicultural Societies. Critical Reflections, 1(12), 1–12. Retrieved from https://englishc1.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/turin_paper_casal.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesCervatiuc, A. (2018). Incidental learning of vocabulary. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (pp. 1–6). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0819eng
dcterms.referencesChadwick, T. (2012). Language awareness in teaching: A toolkit for content and language teachers. Retrieved from www.cambridge.orgeng
dcterms.referencesChandler, P. M. (2008). The appropriate teaching of vocabulary: What the research suggests. Hispania, 91(1), 247–248. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20063672eng
dcterms.referencesChizhik, E. W., & Chizhik, A. W. (2018). Using activity theory to examine how teachers’ lesson plans meet students’ learning needs. Teacher Educator, 53(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2017.1296913eng
dcterms.referencesCIE. (2017). Implementing the curriculum with Cambridge: A guide for school leaders.eng
dcterms.referencesCoady, J. (1979). A psycholinguistic model of the ESL reader. (R. Macky, B. Barkman, & R. Jordan, Eds.), Reading in a second language. Newbury House Publishers.eng
dcterms.referencesCoady, J., & Huckin, T. (1997). Second language vocabulary acquisition: a rationale for pedagogy. Rowley: Cambridge University Press.eng
dcterms.referencesCohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Abingdon: Routledge. Retrieved from http://dspace.utamu.ac.ug:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/182/Research-Methodsin-Education-sixth-edition.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesCorbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.eng
dcterms.referencesCouncil of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.eng
dcterms.referencesCoyle, D. (2005). CLIL: Planning tools for teachers. Nottingham. Retrieved from https://www.unifg.it/sites/default/files/allegatiparagrafo/20-01- 2014/coyle_clil_planningtool_kit.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesCoyle, D. (2007). Content and Language Integrated Learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.2167/beb459.0eng
dcterms.referencesCoyle, D. (2015). Strengthening integrated learning: Towards a new era for pluriliteracies and intercultural learning. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 8(2), 84–103. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2015.8.2.2eng
dcterms.referencesCoyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL : Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.eng
dcterms.referencesCreese, A. (2010). Content-focused classrooms and learning English: How teachers collaborate. Theory Into Practice, 49(2), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841003626494eng
dcterms.referencesCreswell, J. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design :choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.eng
dcterms.referencesCreswell, J., & Poth, C. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). California: Sage Publicationseng
dcterms.referencesDale, L., & Tanner, R. (2012). CLIL Activities with CD-ROM: A resource for subject and language teachers. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.eng
dcterms.referencesDalton-Puffer. (2008). Outcomes and processes in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): current research from Europe. In Future Perspectives for English Language Teaching (pp. 139–157). Retrieved from https://www.univie.ac.at/Anglistik/Dalton/SEW07/CLIL research overview article.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesDalton-Puffer, C. (2010). Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms (Vol. 7). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.eng
dcterms.referencesDalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content-and-language integrated Learning: From practice to principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000092eng
dcterms.referencesDavis, K. A. (1992). Validity and reliability in qualitative research on second language acquisition and teaching. Another researcher comments. TESOL Quarterly, 26(3), 605. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587190eng
dcterms.referencesDay, R. R., Bamford, J., Renandya, W. A., Jacobs, G. M., & yu, V. W. S. (1998). Extensive reading in the second language classroom. RELC Journal, 29(2), 187–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829802900211eng
dcterms.referencesDe Bot, K. (2007). Language teaching in a changing world. The Modern Language Journal The Modern Language Journal, 91(91), 274–276. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4626013eng
dcterms.referencesDe Graaff, R., Jan Koopman, G., Anikina, Y., Westhoff, G., Koopman, G. J., Anikina, Y., & Westhoff, G. (2007). An observation tool for effective L2 pedagogy in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 603–624. https://doi.org/10.2167/beb462.0eng
dcterms.referencesDiaz-Maggioli, G. (2003). Professional development for language teachers. Eric Digest, 3(3). Retrieved from https://unitus.org/full/0303diaz.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesDodge, J., & Dodge, B. (2008). What are formative assessments and why should we use them? Retrieved October 4, 2017, from https://www.scholastic.com/teachers/articles/teachingcontenteng
dcterms.referencesDörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2009). Questionnaires in second language research: construction, administration, and processing (2nd ed.). Routledge: Routledge.eng
dcterms.referencesDuin, A., & Graves, M. (1987). Intensive vocabulary instruction as a prewriting technique. International Literary Association, 22(3), 311–330. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/747971.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesEchevarría, J., & Vogt, M. (2013). Making content comprehensible for English learners: The SIOP model (4th Edition) (Vol. 17).eng
dcterms.referencesElley, W. B., & Mangubhai, F. (1983). The impact of reading on second language learning. Reading Research Quarterly, 53–67.eng
dcterms.referencesElliott, V. (2018). Thinking about the coding process in qualitative data analysis. The Qualitative Report (Vol. 23).eng
dcterms.referencesEllis, N. C. (1994). Consciousness in second language learning: Psychological perspectives on the role of conscious processes in vocabulary acquisition. AILA Review, 11, 37–56. Retrieved from https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/139859/EllisAILA11.pdf?sequenc e=1&isAllowed=yeng
dcterms.referencesElster, D. (2009). Biology in context: teachers’ professional development in learning communities. Journal of Biological Education, 43(2), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2009.9656152eng
dcterms.referencesErfanpour, M. (2013). The effect of intensive and extensive reading strategies on reading comprehension: A case of Iranian high school students. English for Specific Purposes, 41(14). Retrieved from http://www.esp-world.info/Articles_41/Doc/Erfanpour.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesEvans, L. (2002). What is teacher development? Oxford Review of Education, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980120113670eng
dcterms.referencesEvelyn, E., & Beltrán, V. (2010). Fostering self-efficacy strategies towards intensive reading in ten-year old students in a blended English language learning environment. Universidad de la Sabana.eng
dcterms.referencesFarrugia, M. T. (2013). Moving from informal to formal mathematical language in Maltese classrooms. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(5), 570–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2012.716814eng
dcterms.referencesFernández-Sanjurjo, J., Fernández-Costales, A., Miguel, J., & Blanco, A. (2017). Analysing students’ content-learning in science in CLIL vs. non-CLIL programmes: empirical evidence from Spain. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1294142eng
dcterms.referencesFile, K. A., & Adams, R. (2010). Should vocabulary instruction be integrated or isolated? TESOL Quarterly, 44(2), 222–249. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2010.219943eng
dcterms.referencesFlick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research (4th ed.).eng
dcterms.referencesFriedman, D. A. (2012). How to collect and analyze qualitative data. In A. Mackey & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Research Methods in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 180–200). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444347340.ch10eng
dcterms.referencesGablasova, D. (2014). Learning and retaining specialized vocabulary from textbook reading: Comparison of learning outcomes through L1 and L2. The Modern Language Journal, 98(4), 976–991. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43651848eng
dcterms.referencesGierlinger, E. M., & Wagner, T. A. (2016). The more the merrier – revisiting CLIL-based vocabulary growth in secondary education. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 9(1), 37–63. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2016.9.1.3eng
dcterms.referencesGiven, L. (2014). The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods codes and coding. Sage Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909.n48eng
dcterms.referencesGraddol, D. (2006). English next. Why global English may mean the end of “English as a foreign language” (Vol. 2). London: British Council.eng
dcterms.referencesGraves, M. F. (1986). Vocabulary learning and instruction. Review of Research in Education, 13, 49–89. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732x013001049eng
dcterms.referencesGriffee, D. T. (2018). An Introduction to second language research and data. (TESL-EJ Publications. Berkeley and Kyoto, Ed.) (2nd ed.).eng
dcterms.referencesHarmon, J. M., Hedrick, W. B., & Fox, E. A. (2000). A content analysis of vocabulary instruction in social studies textbooks for grades 4-8. The Elementary School Journal, 100(3), 253–271. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1002154eng
dcterms.referencesHarmon, J. M., Hedrick, W. B., & Wood, K. D. (2005). Research on vocabulary instruction in the content areas: Implications for struggling readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21(3), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560590949377eng
dcterms.referencesHillyard, S. (2011). First steps in CLIL: Training the teachers. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 4(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2011.4.2.1eng
dcterms.referencesHolloway, I., & Todres, L. (2003). The status of method: flexibility, consistency and coherence. Qualitative Research, 3(3), 345–357eng
dcterms.referencesHortua Bravo, S., & Manjarres, P. (2013). The use of reading tasks based on authentic texts to improve reading comprehension on English learners. Universidad de la Sabana. Retrieved from https://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/handle/10818/8304eng
dcterms.referencesHulstijn, J. H. (2003). Incidental and intentional learning. The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, 14, 349–381. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch12eng
dcterms.referencesIwahori, Y. (2008). Developing reading fluency: A study of extensive reading in EFL. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20(1), 70–91. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ791535&site=ehost-liveeng
dcterms.referencesJenkins, J. R., Stein, M. L., & Wysocki, K. (1984). Learning vocabulary through reading. American Educational Research Journal, 21(4), 767–787. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312021004767eng
dcterms.referencesJiménez, N. E., Victoria, D. M., & Iragi, Z. (2013). Why to Clil ? Effects of Clil on reading comprehension. Universidad Pública de Navarra. Retrieved from http://academicae.unavarra.es/bitstreameng
dcterms.referencesJohnston, L. E., Mercer, S. H., & Geres-Smith, R. (2018). Incorporating vocabulary instruction in individual reading fluency interventions with English language learners vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 33(331), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573516658855eng
dcterms.referencesJudd, E. L. (1978). Vocabulary teaching and TESOL: A need for reevaluation of existing assumptions. TESOL Quarterly, 12(1), 71–76. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3585792eng
dcterms.referencesKinloch, V., & Faulkner, J. (2010). Innovative writing instruction; Reducing vocabulary to increase vocabulary: Student-centered vocabulary instruction for writing that makes a difference. The English Journal, 100(1), 113–116. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20787703eng
dcterms.referencesKrashen, S. D. (1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: additional evidence for the input. Source: The Modern Language Journal (Vol. 73). Winter.eng
dcterms.referencesKrashen, S. D. (2004). The power of reading: insights from the research (2nd ed.). ABC-CLIO.eng
dcterms.referencesLasagabaster, D., & Doiz, A. (2015). CLIL students’ perceptions of their language learning process: delving into self-perceived improvement and instructional preferences. Language Awareness, 25(1), 110–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2015.1122019eng
dcterms.referencesLasagabaster, D., & Doiz, A. (2016). CLIL students’ perceptions of their language learning process: delving into self-perceived improvement and instructional preferences. Language Awareness, 25(1–2), 110–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2015.1122019doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2015.1122019eng
dcterms.referencesLaufer, B. (2012). The lexical plight in second language reading: Words you don’t know, words you think you know, and words you can’t guess. In J. Coday & T. Huckin. (Eds.), Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition (pp. 20–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139524643.004eng
dcterms.referencesLave, J., Wenger, E., & Alfaro, C. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge university press. Retrieved from http://www.universidad-de-la-calle.com/Wenger.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesLeader-Janssen, E. M., & Rankin-Erickson, J. L. (2013). Preservice teachers’ content knowledge and self-efficacy for teaching reading. Literacy Research and Instruction, 52(3), 204–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2013.781253eng
dcterms.referencesLichtman, M. (2012). Qualitative research in education: A user’s guide. Sage publications.eng
dcterms.referencesLindroth, J. (2014). Reflective journals: A review of the literature. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education , 34(1), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123314548046eng
dcterms.referencesLivers, S. D., & Elmore, P. (2018). Attending to precision: Vocabulary support in middle school mathematics classrooms. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 34(2), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2017.1370624eng
dcterms.referencesLlinares, A. (2015). Integration in CLIL: a proposal to inform research and successful pedagogy. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.1000925eng
dcterms.referencesLong, D. ., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1993). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Modern Language Journal, 77(2), 235. https://doi.org/10.2307/328955eng
dcterms.referencesLong, M. (1998). Focus on form in task-based language teaching. Working Papers Tu ESI, 16(2), 35–39. Retrieved from https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125/40789/1/Long %281998%29_WP16%282%29.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesLoucky, J. P. (2003). Combining intensive and extensive reading strategies with cooperative and communicative learning activities. Word Journal Of The International Linguistic Association. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267720797eng
dcterms.referencesLuis Banegas, D. (2017). Applied linguistics perspectives on CLIL. In International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Darío Luis Banegas. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1350269eng
dcterms.referencesLuisa Pérez-Cañado, M. (2012). CLIL research in Europe: past, present, and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(3), 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2011.630064eng
dcterms.referencesMacalister, J. (2014). Teaching reading: Research into practice. Language Teaching, 47(3), 387– 397. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144481400007Xeng
dcterms.referencesMack, N., Woodsong, C., MacQueen, K., Guest, G., & Namey, E. (2005). Qualitative research methods: A data collector’s field guide. In Family Health International. North Carolina: Family Health International. Retrieved from https://course.ccs.neu.edu/is4800sp12/resources/qualmethods.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesMariño, C. M. (2014). Towards implementing CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) at CBS (Tunja, Colombia). Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 16(2), 151– 160. https://doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.calj.2014.2.a02eng
dcterms.referencesMarsh, D., Maljers, A., & Hartiala, A.-K. (2001). Profiling European CLIL classrooms: Languages open doors. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.eng
dcterms.referencesMartínez, J. F., Borko, H., & Stecher, B. M. (2012). Measuring instructional practice in science using classroom artifacts: lessons learned from two validation studies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1), 38–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20447eng
dcterms.referencesMay, W. T. (1993). “Teachers-as-researchers” or action research: What is it, and what good is it for art education? Studies in Art Education, 34(2), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.2307/1320448eng
dcterms.referencesMcDougald, J. S. (2015). Teachers’ attitudes, perceptions and experiences in CLIL: A look at content and language. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 17(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.calj.2015.1.a02eng
dcterms.referencesMcDougald, J. S. (2016a). CLIL approaches in education: Opportunities, challenges, or threats? Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 9(2), 253–266. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2016.9.2.1eng
dcterms.referencesMcDougald, J. S. (2016b). Is CLIL becoming a hub connecting research, policy, and practice? Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 9(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2016.9.1.1eng
dcterms.referencesMiftah, M. Z. (2015). Implementation of intensive-extensive reading strategy to improve reading comprehension. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 3(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v3i1.5eng
dcterms.referencesMoate, J. (2011). Reconceptualising the role of talk in CLIL. Journal of Applied Language Studies, 5(2), 17–35. Retrieved from http://apples.jyu.fieng
dcterms.referencesMohan, B. A. (1979). Relating language teaching and content teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 13(2), 171–182. https://doi.org/org/10.2307/3586208eng
dcterms.referencesMohan, B., & Van Naerssen, M. (1997). Understanding cause-effect: Learning through language. In Forum (Vol. 35). ERIC.eng
dcterms.referencesMorton, T. (2015). Vocabulary explanations in CLIL classrooms: a conversation analysis perspective. The Language Learning Journal, 43(3), 256–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2015.1053283eng
dcterms.referencesNagy, W., & Townsend, D. (2012). Words as tools: Learning academic vocabulary as language acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(1), 91–108eng
dcterms.referencesNation. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.eng
dcterms.referencesNation, I. S. P. (2008). Teaching vocabulary: Strategies and techniques. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.eng
dcterms.referencesNation, & Wang, M. K. (1999). Graded readers and vocabulary. Reading in a Foreign Language, 12(2), 355–380. Retrieved from www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/about/staff/publications/paulnation/1999-Wang-Graded-readers.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesNikula, T. (2015). Hands-on tasks in CLIL science classrooms as sites for subject-specific language use and learning. System, 54, 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.04.003eng
dcterms.referencesNunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.eng
dcterms.referencesNuñez Asomoza, A. (2015). Students’ perceptions of the impact of CLIL in a Mexican BA program. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 17(2), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v17n2.47065eng
dcterms.referencesNuttall, C. E., & Alderson, J. C. (1996). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language (2nd ed.). Heinemann.eng
dcterms.referencesOrtiz, D., & Green, J. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches [Book Review] [online]. Qualitative Research Journal, 6(2), 205–207. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0602205eng
dcterms.referencesOrtlipp, M. (2008). Keeping and using reflective journals in the qualitative research process. The Qualitative Report, 13(4).eng
dcterms.referencesParan, A. (2003). Intensive reading English teaching professional. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.eng
dcterms.referencesPark, A. Y. (2017). A comparison of the impact of extensive and intensive reading approaches on the Korean EFL learners’ reading rate and reading comprehension development. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 6(3), 131. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.3p.131eng
dcterms.referencesPark, A. Y., Isaacs, T., & Woodfield, H. (2018). A comparison of the effects of extensive and intensive reading approaches on the vocabulary development of Korean secondary EFL learners. Applied Linguistics Review, 9(1), 113–134. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017- 0025eng
dcterms.referencesPavón Vázquez, V. (2018). Innovations and Challenges in CLIL Research: Exploring the Development of Subject-Specific Literacies. Theory Into Practice, 57(3), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2018.1484035eng
dcterms.referencesPavón Vázquez, V., & Ellison, M. (2013). Examining teacher roles and competences in Content and Language Integrated Learning. Lingvarvmare, 4, 65–78.eng
dcterms.referencesPérez Agustín, M. (2019). Meeting CLIL teachers’ training and professional development needs. NABE Journal of Research and Practice, 9(3–4), 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/26390043.2019.1634961eng
dcterms.referencesPerez Cañado, M. L. (2016). Are teachers ready for CLIL? Evidence from a European study. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39(2), 202–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1138104eng
dcterms.referencesPérez Cañado, M. L. (2016). Teacher training needs for bilingual education: in-service teacher perceptions. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 19(3), 266– 295. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.980778eng
dcterms.referencesPérez, L., & Alvira, R. (2017). The acquisition of vocabulary through three memory strategies. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 19(1), 103. https://doi.org/10.14483/calj.v19n1.10032eng
dcterms.referencesPerfetti, C., & Hart, L. (2005). Word learning and individual differences in word learning reflected in event-related potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 31(6), 1281–1292. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1281eng
dcterms.referencesPerfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.827687eng
dcterms.referencesPiaget, J. (1971). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Journal of Arquitectural Education, 25(4), 113. https://doi.org/10.2307/1423801eng
dcterms.referencesPonniah, R. J. (2011). Incidental acquisition of vocabulary by reading. The Reading Matrix, 11(2), 135–139. Retrieved from http://www.readingmatrix.com/articles/april_2011/ponniah.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesRashidi, N., & Piran, M. (2011). The effect of extensive and intensive reading on Iranian EFL learners’ vocabulary size and depth. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(2), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.2.471-482eng
dcterms.referencesReason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2008). The SAGE handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.eng
dcterms.referencesRestrepo Ramos, F. D. (2015). Incidental vocabulary learning in second language acquisition: A literature review. Profile Issues in Teachers` Professional Development, 17(1), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v17n1.43957eng
dcterms.referencesRice, W. H. (1944). General considerations on unit lesson plans in modern language teaching. The Modern Language Journal, 28(8), 650–654. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1944.tb03970.xeng
dcterms.referencesRichards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. W. (2013). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (4th ed.). London & New York: Routledge.eng
dcterms.referencesRichie, J., & Lewis, J. (2003). Generalising from qualitative research. In Qualitative Research Practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (pp. 347–362).eng
dcterms.referencesRodríguez Bonces, M. (2011). CLIL: Colombia leading into content language learning. Ïkala, Revista Del Lenguage y Cultura, 16(28), 79–89. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/ikala/v16n28/v16n28a04.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesRodríguez, J. (2012). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL): Considerations in the Colombian context. Gist Education and Learning Research Journal, 6, 177–189. Retrieved from https://www.unifg.it/sites/default/files/allegatiparagrafo/06-07- 2017/bonces_clil_in_the_colombian_context.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesRoiha, A. (2019). Investigating former pupils’ experiences and perceptions of CLIL in Finland: a retrospective analysis Investigating former pupils’ experiences and perceptions of CLIL in Finland: a retrospective analysis. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy . https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2019.1586514eng
dcterms.referencesRuiz de Zarobe, Y. (2008). Aprendizaje integrado de contenidos curriculares en inglés lengua extranjera: diferencias con el aprendizaje del inglés como asignatura. In 25 años de Linguistica Aplicada en España:Hitos y Retos (pp. 413–419)spa
dcterms.referencesRuiz de Zarobe, Y., & Lasagabaster, D. (2011). CLIL in Spain: Implementation, results and teacher training. ELT Journal, 65(4), 495–498. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr056eng
dcterms.referencesRuiz De Zarobe, Y., & Zenotz, V. (2015). Reading strategies and CLIL: the effect of training in formal instruction. The Language Learning Journal, 43(3), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2015.1053284eng
dcterms.referencesRuiz De Zarobe, Y., & Zenotz, V. (2017). Learning strategies in CLIL classrooms: how does strategy instruction affect reading competence over time? International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism , 21(3), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1391745eng
dcterms.referencesRyder, R. J., & Graves, M. F. (1994). Vocabulary instruction presented prior to reading in two basal readers. The Elementary School Journal, 95(2), 139–153. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/461795eng
dcterms.referencesSaldaña, J. (2009). An introduction to codes and coding. In The coding manual for qualitative researchers (Vol. 3)eng
dcterms.referencesSanad, H. A., & Gaber, M. (2017). Using Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) to develop EFL reading comprehension skills, vocabulary skills and retention among college students. Journal of Research in Curriculum (Vol. 3).eng
dcterms.referencesSedita, J. (2005). Effective vocabulary instruction (Vol. 2). Retrieved from https://www.cgcatogo.com/uploads/1/0/6/7/10675379/effective-vocabulary-instruction.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesSepešiová, M. (2015). CLIL lesson planning. In CLIL in Foreign Language Education: etextbook for foreign language teachers (pp. 131–152). https://doi.org/10.17846/CLIL.2015.131-152eng
dcterms.referencesShen, Y. (2008). An exploration of schema theory in intensive reading. English Language Teaching, 1(2), 104–107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v1n2p104eng
dcterms.referencesShort, D. J. (1993). Assessing integrated language and content instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 27(4), 627–656. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3587399eng
dcterms.referencesSmit, N., Van De Grift, W., De Bot, K., & Jansen, E. (2017). A classroom observation tool for scaffolding reading comprehension. System, 65, 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.12.014eng
dcterms.referencesSnow, M. A., Met, M., & Genesee, F. (1989). A conceptual framework for the integration of language and content in second/foreign language instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 23(2), 201– 217. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587333eng
dcterms.referencesSterling, S., & Gass, S. (2017). Exploring the boundaries of research ethics: perceptions of ethics and ethical behaviors in applied linguistics research. System, 70, 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.08.010eng
dcterms.referencesStobie, T. (2013). Implementing the curriculum with Cambridge: A guide for school leaders. Camberwell, Australia: Cambridge University Presseng
dcterms.referencesStoner, J. B. (2010). Chapter 2. Qualitative research in education: Other methods of seeking knowledge. In Current issues and trends in special education: Research, technology, and teacher preparation (1st ed., pp. 19–39). Emerald Group.eng
dcterms.referencesSuhendi, A. (2018). Constructivist learning theory: The contribution to foreign language learning and teaching. KnE Social Sciences, 3(4), 87. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i4.1921eng
dcterms.referencesSwart, F., De Graaff, R., Onstenk, J., & Knèzic, D. (2018). Teacher educators’ conceptualization of ongoing language development in professional learning and teaching. Professional DeveloPment in Education, 44(3), 412–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2017.1345775eng
dcterms.referencesTaboada, A., & Rutherford, V. (2011). Developing reading comprehension and academic vocabulary for English language learners through science content: A formative experiment. Reading Psychology, 32(2), 113–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711003604468eng
dcterms.referencesThomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility - Office of Science Education. (2018). Cell divison throuhg Mitosis. Retrieved from https://education.jlab.org/reading/mitosis_01.htmleng
dcterms.referencesTragant, E., Marsol, A., Serrano, R., & Llanes, À. (2015). Vocabulary learning at primary school: a comparison of EFL and CLIL. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 19(5), 579–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2015.1035227eng
dcterms.referencesTudor, I. (2001). The dynamics of the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.eng
dcterms.referencesTuğrul Mart, C. (2015). Combining extensive and intensive reading to reinforce language learning. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World, 5(4), 85–90.eng
dcterms.referencesVadasy, P. F., Sanders, E. A., & Logan Herrera, B. (2015). Efficacy of rich vocabulary instruction in fourth- and fifth-grade classrooms. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 8(3), 325–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2014.933495eng
dcterms.referencesValeo, A. (2010). The integration of language and content: Form-focused instruction in a content-based language program. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.ez.unisabana.edu.co/docview/869989281/fulltextPDFeng
dcterms.referencesVan Compernolle, R. A., & Henery, A. (2015). Learning to do concept- based pragmatics instruction: teacher development and L2 pedagogical content knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 19(3), 351–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541719eng
dcterms.referencesVanDe Weghe, R. (2007). What about vocabulary Instruction. The English Journal, 97(1), 101– 104.eng
dcterms.referencesVaughn, S., Martinez, L. R., Linan-Thompson, S., Reutebuch, C. K., Carlson, C. D., & Francis, D. J. (2009). Enhancing social studies vocabulary and comprehension for seventh-grade english language learners: Findings from two experimental studies. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(4), 297–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345740903167018eng
dcterms.referencesVygotsky, L. (1978). La mente en la sociedad: el desarrollo de las funciones psicológicas superiores. Harvard UniversityPress, Cambridespa
dcterms.referencesWattenberg, M., & Viégas, F. B. (2008). The word tree, an interactive visual concordance. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 14(6), 1221–1228. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2008.172eng
dcterms.referencesWilkinson, D., & Birmingham, P. (2003). Using research instruments- A guide for researchers. (Taylor & Francis e.Library, Ed.). London. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.458.2061&rep=rep1&type=pdfeng
dcterms.referencesWillis, J. (2008). Qualitative research methods in education and educational technology. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publisher. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=470168&site=eds-liveeng
dcterms.referencesXerri, D. (2015). Maximising the value of CLIL through teacher education and development. CLIL in Foreign Language Education: E-Textbook for Foreign Language Teachers., 112–118. https://doi.org/10.17846/CLIL.2015.112-118eng
dcterms.referencesZimmerman, C. B. (1997). Do reading and interactive vocabulary instruction make a difference? An empirical study. TESOL Quarterly, 31(1), 121–140. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3587978eng


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
Parroquiano, Final Version.pdf
Tamaño:
947.6Kb
Formato:
PDF
Descripción:
Ver documento en PDF
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International