Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.advisorMaldonado Chacón, Pedro Pablo
dc.contributor.authorOsma Pinzon, Jenny Carolina
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-14T20:46:54Z
dc.date.available2014-11-14T20:46:54Z
dc.date.created2014
dc.date.issued2014-11-14
dc.identifier.citationBabbie, E. R. (2013). The Practice of Social Research (13th ed.). Wadsworth: CENGAGE Learning.
dc.identifier.citationBenson, P. (2001). Teaching and Researching Autonomy in Language Learning. Harlow: Longman.
dc.identifier.citationBirren, J. E., & Cochran, K. N. (2001). Telling the Stories of Life through Guided Autobiography Groups. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
dc.identifier.citationBolitho, R., Carter, R., Hughes, R., Ivanic, R., Masuhara, H., & Tomlinson, B. (2003). Ten questions about language awareness. ELT Journal, 57(3), 251-259
dc.identifier.citationBram, B. (1995). Write Well, Improving Writing Skills. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
dc.identifier.citationBrown, H. D. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. New York: Pearson Longman.
dc.identifier.citationBurns, A. (1999). Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationBurns, A. (2010). Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching: A Guide for Practitioners. New York: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citationCamelo González, M. J. (2010). El mejoramiento cualitativo de la escritura a partir de la metacognición. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 12(1), 54-69.
dc.identifier.citationCampbell, K. S. (1995). Coherence, Continuity, and Cohesion: Theoretical Foundations for Document Design. New Jersey: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citationCanale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative performance. In J. C. Richards, & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and Communication. New York: Longman.
dc.identifier.citationCarvajal Medina, N. E., & Roberto Flórez, E. E. (2014). Collaborative Work as an Alternative for Writing Research Articles. PROFILE: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development, 16(1), 119-136
dc.identifier.citationCentro de Lenguas Universidad El Bosque. (n.d.). Centro de Lenguas. Retrieved 11 06, 2013, from Website of Universidad El Bosque: http://www.uelbosque.edu.co/institucional/directorio/centro-lenguas
dc.identifier.citationChan, V. (2001). Readiness for Learner Autonomy: what do our learners tell us? Teaching in Higher Education, 6(4), 505-518.
dc.identifier.citationChiang, S. (1999). Assessing grammatical and textual features in L2 writing samples: the case of French as a foreign language. Modern Language Journal, 83(2), 219-232.
dc.identifier.citationChiang, S. (2003). The importance of cohesive conditions to perceptions of writing quality at the early stages of foreign language learning. System, 31, 471-484
dc.identifier.citationCotterall, S. (2000). Promoting learner autonomy through the curriculum: principles for designing language courses. ELT Journal, 54(2), 109-117.
dc.identifier.citationCouncil of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationFreeman, D. (1998). Doing Teacher Research: From Inquiry to Understanding. Toronto: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
dc.identifier.citationGale, X. L. (1994). Personal Experience and Academic Discourse: Teaching Writing through Autobiography. Retrieved 11 15, 2011, from ERIC: http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtS earch_SearchValue_0=ED372393&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED3723 93
dc.identifier.citationHalliday, M. A., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
dc.identifier.citationHarmer, J. (2004). How to Teach Writing. England: Pearson Education Limited
dc.identifier.citationHarmer, J. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching (4th ed.). England: Pearson Education Limited.
dc.identifier.citationHarrison, J., Blakemore, C., & Buck, M. (2001). Basic Principles of Curriculum Design. In J. M. Harrison, C. L. Blakemore, & M. M. Buck, Instructional Strategies for Secondary School Physical Education (5th ed., pp. 131-148). Boston: McGraw-Hill
dc.identifier.citationHedge, T. (2000). Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationHiemstra, R. (2001). Uses and Benefits of Journal Writing. New Directions for Adult & Continuing Education, 90, 19-26.
dc.identifier.citationHolec, H. (1981). Autonomy and Foreign Language Learning. Oxford: OUP
dc.identifier.citationHyland, K. (2002). Teaching and Researching Writing. London: Longman.
dc.identifier.citationHyland, K. (2003). Second Language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationHyland, K. (2009). Teaching and Researching Writing (2nd ed.). London: Longman
dc.identifier.citationJohnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2010). Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.
dc.identifier.citationJohnson, R. (2012). Improve Your Writing Skills. Manchester: Clifton Press.
dc.identifier.citationJonker, J., & Pennink, B. (2010). The Essence of Research Methodology: A Concise Guide for Master and PhD Students in Management Science. Berlin: Springer.
dc.identifier.citationKern, R., & Schultz, J. M. (2005). Beyond Orality: Investigating Literacy and the Literary in Second and Foreign Language Instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 89(iii), 381- 392.
dc.identifier.citationKirby, D., Liner, T., & Vinz, R. (1988). Inside out: Development strategies for teaching writing (2nd ed.). Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook Heinemann.
dc.identifier.citationLiu, M., & Braine, G. (2005). Cohesive features in argumentative writing produced by Chinese undergraduates. System, 33, 623-636.
dc.identifier.citationMcCarthey, S. J. (1994). Opportunities and Risks of Writing from Personal Experience. Language Arts, 71, 182-191.
dc.identifier.citationMiles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.
dc.identifier.citationMiles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.
dc.identifier.citationNicholas, B. J., Rossiter, M. J., & Abbott, M. L. (2011). The Power of Story in the ESL Classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 67(2), 247-268.
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D. (2004). Task-based Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D. (2007). What is this thing called language? Hampshire, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
dc.identifier.citationOxford, R. L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What every teacher should know. Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
dc.identifier.citationPearson Education Limited. (2002). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics (3rd ed.). (J. C. Richards, & R. Schmidt, Eds.) Harlow: Longman.
dc.identifier.citationRainer, T. (2004). The New Diary. How to use a journal for self-guidance and expanded creativity. Los Angeles: J.P. Tarcher Inc.
dc.identifier.citationReid, J. M. (1993). Teaching ESL Writing. Prentice Hall.
dc.identifier.citationRichards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationRobinson, P. (2011). Task-Based Language Learning: A Review of Issues. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Task-Based Language Learning (pp. 1-36). Malden: John Wiley & Sons.
dc.identifier.citationSagor, R. (1993). How to Conduct Collaborative Action Research. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
dc.identifier.citationScharle, Á., & Szabó, A. (2000). Learner Autonomy: A Guide to Developing Learner Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
dc.identifier.citationSchellekens, P. (2007). The Oxford ESOL Handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationSeow, A. (2002). The Writing Process and Process Writing. In J. C. Richards, & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice (pp. 315-320). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationSkehan, P. (1998). A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationSmith, J. L. (1996). Journals in the Classroom: Writing to Learn. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 40(2), p. 155.
dc.identifier.citationSmith, M. (1999, 2006, 2013). The encyclopaedia of informal education. Retrieved 11 13, 2011, from 'Keeping a learning journal': http://infed.org/mobi/writing-and-keeping-journals-aguide-for-educators-and-social-practitioners/
dc.identifier.citationStrauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. London: SAGE Publications.
dc.identifier.citationStrauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (3rd ed.). California: Sage Publications.
dc.identifier.citationTuan, L. T. (2003). Enhancing EFL Learners' Writing Skill via Journal Writing. English Language Teaching, 3(3), 81-88.
dc.identifier.citationWallace, M. J. (1998). Action Research for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationWorthington, L. (1997). Let's Not Show the Teacher: EFL Students' Secret Exchange Journals. English Teaching Forum, 35(3), 2. Retrieved from http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/usia/EUSIA/forum/vols/vol35/no3/p2.htm
dc.identifier.citationYang, W., & Sun, Y. (2012). The use of cohesive devices in argumentative writing by Chinese EFL learners at different proficiency levels. Linguistics and Education, 23, 31-48.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/12467
dc.description89 Páginas
dc.description.abstractEste estudio de investigación acción fue llevado a cabo con dieciséis estudiantes de una universidad privada en Bogotá. El objetivo de este estudio fue investigar el desarrollo de la conciencia y el mejoramiento de la cohesión escrita con respecto al uso de conectores a través de la escritura de historias autobiográficas escritas en diarios. La información obtenida vino de la implementación de diarios, un cuestionario en la mitad del proceso, y una entrevista semiestructurada. Los hallazgos obtenidos permitieron al investigador concluir que: al final del estudio los diarios de los estudiantes exhibieron un aumento en el uso de conectores, específicamente de adición y de tiempo, comparado con su frecuencia de uso al inicio del estudio. Además, los estudiantes fueron capaces de afrontar estratégicamente sus tareas escritas centrándose en la forma para ocuparse de la construcción del texto mismo, y también en el contenido, escogiendo un tema dentro del campo de las historias de vida, lo que lo hizo más fácil y más significativo para ellos; y, por otra parte, escogiendo y usando estrategias como la lluvia de ideas y los borradores para afrontar mejor las tareas escritas.es_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.subjectEscritura -- Inglés -- Colombia
dc.subjectInglés -- Enseñanza
dc.subjectComunicación escrita -- Inglés -- Colombia
dc.titleDeveloping students’ writing and awareness through autobiographical life stories using journals in the EFL classroomes_CO
dc.typemasterThesis
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomo
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjeras
dc.identifier.local260008
dc.identifier.localTE06981
dc.type.localTesis de maestría
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomo


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem