Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.advisorÁlvarez Ayure, Claudia Patricia
dc.contributor.authorBarón Peña, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Orjuela, Magda Liliana
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-19T20:42:20Z
dc.date.available2013-09-19T20:42:20Z
dc.date.created2013
dc.date.issued2013-09-19
dc.identifier.citationAlemi, M., and Tayebi, A., (2011). The influence of incidental and intentional vocabulary acquisition and vocabulary strategy use on learning L2 vocabularies. JLTR Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(1)
dc.identifier.citationAnderson, N. J. (2002). The role of metacognition in second language teaching and learning. ERIC Digest. Education Resources Information Center
dc.identifier.citationArnold, J., & Brown, D. (1999). A map of the terrain. In J. Arnold (Ed.), Affect in language learning (pp. 142-154). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationBeatty, K. (2003). Teaching and researching computer assisted language learning, New York: Longman.
dc.identifier.citationBeck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., and Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. New York: Guilford Press
dc.identifier.citationCekada, T. (2011). Conducting an effective needs assessment. Professional Safety– The Journal of the American Society of Safety Engineers, 56, 28-34
dc.identifier.citationChamot, A. U., and O’Malley, J. M. (1996). The Cognitive academic language learning approach (CALLA): A model for linguistically diverse classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 96 (3): 259-273.
dc.identifier.citationCook, L. K., and Mayer, R. E. (1983). Reading strategies training for meaningful learning from prose. In M. Pressley, & J. Levin (Eds.).Cognitive strategy research (pp. 14-27 ). New York: Springer Verlag.
dc.identifier.citationCreswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
dc.identifier.citationDieu, B. (2004). Blogging and presence online. Retrieved May 5, 2004, from http://members.tripod.com/the_english_dept/blog04
dc.identifier.citationDodge, B. (1995). WebQuests: A technique for internet-based learning. Distance Educator, 1(2), 10-13.
dc.identifier.citationDörnyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and researching motivation. Harlow: Pearson education. Limited.
dc.identifier.citationFacione, P.A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. The Delphi Report: Research Findings and Recommendations Prepared for the American Philosophical Association (ERIC document no. ED 315–423). ERIC, Washington, DC.
dc.identifier.citationFriesner, T., and Hart, M. (2005) “Learning logs: Assessment or research method” The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methodology Volume 3 Issue 2, pp 117-122, available online at http://www.ejbrm.com
dc.identifier.citationGoodfellow, R. (1994). Design principles for computer-aided vocabulary learning. Computers & Education, 23, 53-62.
dc.identifier.citationKnowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
dc.identifier.citationHiggs, J. (1988). Planning learning experiences to promote autonomous learning. In D. Baud (Ed.), Developing student autonomy in learning (2nd ed.) (pp. 40-58). London: Kogan Page University Press
dc.identifier.citationHarris, V. (2003). Adapting classroom-based strategy instruction to a distance learning context. TESL-Electronic Journal, 7(2), 1-19.
dc.identifier.citationHalpern, D. F. (1998). Award for distinguished teaching in psychology. American Psychologist, 53, 879-881.
dc.identifier.citationHalpern, D. F. (2003a). The “how” and “why” of critical thinking assessment. In D. Fasko (Ed.), Critical thinking and reasoning: Current research, theory and practice. Cresskill: Hampton Press.
dc.identifier.citationHalpern, D. F. (2003b). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (4th ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
dc.identifier.citationHedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in language classrooms. Oxford: Oxford
dc.identifier.citationHolec, H. (1981). Autonomy in foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
dc.identifier.citationHurd, S. (2008) Affect and strategy use in independent language learning. In S. Hurd & T. Lewis (E ds) Language learning strategies in independent settings (pp. 218-236). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
dc.identifier.citationLaufer, B. (2005). Focus on form in second language vocabulary learning. EUROSLA Yearbook, 5, 223–250
dc.identifier.citationLuckey, G. M. (2003). Critical thinking in colleges and universities: A model. In D. Fasko (Ed.), Critical thinking and reasoning (pp. 253–271). Cresskill: Hampton Press.
dc.identifier.citationMacLean, M. S., and Mohr, M. (1999). Teacher- researchers at work. Berkeley, CA: National Writing Project, p. 56-66
dc.identifier.citationMarch, T. (2003). The learning power of WebQuests. Educational Leadership, 61 (4), 42-48
dc.identifier.citationMarsh, D. (1994). Bilingual Education & Content and Language Integrated Learning. Paris: International Association for Cross-cultural Communication, Language Teaching in the Member States of the European Union (Lingua), University of Sorbonne.
dc.identifier.citationMarsh, D. (2000). Using languages to learn and learning to use languages, Finland, University of Jyväskylä.
dc.identifier.citationMcLeod, D. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A Reconceptualization. In D.A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp.575-596). New York: Macmillan
dc.identifier.citationMoir, J., and Nation, P. (2008). Vocabulary and good language learners. Lessons from good language learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationMukoroli, J. (2011). Effective vocabulary teaching strategies for academic purposes ESL classroom. AYMAT Individual Thesis / SMAT IPP Collection. Paper 501.
dc.identifier.citationNagy, W. E., and Scott, J. A. (2000). Vocabulary processes. In M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 269-284). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
dc.identifier.citationNational Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00–4754). Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
dc.identifier.citationNation, P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Newbury House.
dc.identifier.citationNation, P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
dc.identifier.citationNation, P. (2005). Teaching vocabulary. Asian. EFL Journal, 7(3), 47-54.
dc.identifier.citationNovak, J.D. (1998). Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc, Pub.
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D. (1990). Action research in the language classroom. In J. Richards & D. Nunan (Eds.), Second language teacher education (pp. 62-8). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D. (2000). Autonomy in language learning. Paper presented at plenary presentation, ASOCOPI, Colombia
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D., and Bailey, K. M. (2009). Exploring second language classroom research: A comprehensive guide. Boston, MA: Heinle.
dc.identifier.citationOxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House
dc.identifier.citationOxford, R. (1992/1993). Language learning strategies in a nutshell: Update and ESL suggestions. TESOL Journal, 2(2), 18-2
dc.identifier.citationOxford, R., and Burry-Stock, J. (1995). Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning. System, 23(2), 153-175.
dc.identifier.citationRichards, J. C. (1974). Word lists: problems and prospects. RELC Journal, 5, 69-84.
dc.identifier.citationSchmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationSchmitt, N. (2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12, 329–363
dc.identifier.citationSchraw, G. (1989). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26 (1- 2) 113-125
dc.identifier.citationSims, R.R., and Sims, S.J. (1995). The importance of learning styles: Understanding the implications for learning, course design, and education. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
dc.identifier.citationStahl, S. A. (2005). Four problems with teaching word meanings (And what to do to make vocabulary an integral part of instruction). In E. H. Hiebert & M. L. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
dc.identifier.citationSwartz, R. (2003). Infusing critical and creative thinking into instruction in high school classrooms. In D. Fasko (Ed.), Critical thinking and reasoning (pp. 293–310). Cresskill: Hampton Press
dc.identifier.citationTang E. and H. Nesi. (2003). Teaching vocabulary in two Chinese classrooms: Intensive and extensive exposure in Hong Kong and Guangzhou. Language Teaching Research. 7(1), 65-97.
dc.identifier.citationTaylor, L. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Herefordshire, UK: Prentice Hall International
dc.identifier.citationZimmerman, C. B. (1994). Self-selected reading and interactive vocabulary instruction: Knowledge and perceptions of word learning among L2 learners. Ph.D. dissertation, Los Angeles: University of Southern California
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/8305
dc.description87 Páginas
dc.description.abstractEsta investigación-acción examinó cómo el uso de estrategias metacognitivas, a través de la webquest llamada "El mundo en nuestras manos" en la cual los estudiantes desarrollaron tareas complementarias a la instrucción de clase, influenciaron el aprendizaje de vocabulario. Treinta estudiantes con nivel A1 según el Marco Común Europeo de Referencia para las Lenguas (MCERL) de octavo grado de dos colegios públicos colombianos quienes fueron entrenados en el uso de las estrategias metacognitivas y de vocabulario, participaron en este estudio. Seis intervenciones fueron diseñadas e implementadas siguiendo el modelo de Aprendizaje de Lenguaje Académico y de Contenido (CALLA) – y Aprendizaje de una Lengua Asistido por Computador (CALL). Los datos recolectados sugirieron que el uso de las estrategias metacognitivas en ambientes CALL influenció positivamente el aprendizaje de vocabulario, ya que promovieron la conciencia y autonomía de los participantes. Los hallazgos además indicaron que dichas estrategias ayudaron a obtener mejores resultados en su proceso de aprendizaje, ya que ellos adquirieron conciencia de cuáles prácticas seguir para aprender palabras nuevas efectivamente. Cuando los estudiantes planearon, monitorearon y evaluaron su progreso en el conocimiento de palabras, ellos alcanzaron la mayoría de sus objetivos y fortalecieron su competencia léxica.es_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.subjectInglés -- Enseñanzaes_CO
dc.subjectInglés -- Composición y ejercicioses_CO
dc.subjectUso del ingléses_CO
dc.titleMetacognitive learning strategies: their influences on vocabulary learning through a webquestes_CO
dc.typemasterThesis
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomo
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjeras
dc.identifier.local255565
dc.identifier.localTE06072
dc.type.localTesis de maestría
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomo


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem