Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Building Inference Skills with Web-based Scaffolding Tools

dc.contributor.advisorCuesta Medina, Liliana Marcela
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Herreros Machado, César Augusto
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-24T20:28:50Z
dc.date.available2020-08-24T20:28:50Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-04
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/42990
dc.description160 páginases_CO
dc.description.abstractEste documento es un registro del uso de andamios basados en la web para fomentar la inferencia, mejorando la comprensión de lectura. La lectura es una habilidad crucial que depende del papel activo del lector para construir el significado. El desarrollo de esta habilidad activa apoya el aprendizaje permanente. Se han implementado estrategias para mejorar la capacidad de comprensión de los alumnos por inferencia. Este documento propone que los andamios basados en la web pueden aumentar las habilidades de inferencia y el rendimiento de los alumnos. Investigaciones anteriores han demostrado cómo la inferencia tiene un efecto positivo en la comprensión lectora, presentando cómo fomentar el desarrollo de estas estrategias y su impacto en los lectores. Sin embargo, los estudios carecen de detalles sobre las herramientas tecnológicas utilizadas para promover estrategias de lectura en los alumnos. Este estudio de investigación mixta utilizó pruebas simuladas para explorar cómo las estrategias de inferencia afectan la comprensión de los alumnos en las secciones de lectura de una prueba estandarizada. El estudio recopiló información sobre la percepción de los alumnos sobre los andamios web utilizados para promover la inferencia a través de entrevistas y la evidencia reunida a través de Google Classroom, siguiendo la metodología de la teoría fundamentada. Los datos sugieren que las herramientas integradas para promover la inferencia permitieron un enfoque de lectura más fácil para los lectores con dificultades, que se reflejó en el rendimiento de los alumnos en la sección de lectura de la prueba de salida. Fomentar la inferencia léxica es viable a través de andamios basados en la web. Los andamios seleccionados deben implementarse teniendo en cuenta los recursos disponibles y la integración adecuada al programa de estudios.es_CO
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.sourcereponame:Intellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.subjectIngles -- Enseñanzaes_CO
dc.subjectPedagogíaes_CO
dc.subjectAptitud pedagógicaes_CO
dc.subjectAprendizaje activoes_CO
dc.subjectComprensión de lecturaes_CO
dc.subjectMediciones y pruebas educativases_CO
dc.titleBuilding Inference Skills with Web-based Scaffolding Toolses_CO
dc.typemasterThesises_CO
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigidoes_CO
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjerases_CO
dc.identifier.local277808
dc.identifier.localTE10749
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_CO
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigidoes_CO
dcterms.referencesAlderson, J., & Banerjee, J. (2002). Language testing and assessment (Part 2). Language Teaching, 35(2), 79–113. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444802001751eng
dcterms.referencesAndrei, E. (2019). Adolescent English learners’ use of digital technology in the classroom. Educational Forum, 83(1), 102–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2018.1478474eng
dcterms.referencesArdasheva, Y., Newcomer, S. N., Firestone, J. B., & Lamb, R. L. (2019). Contributions of language-specific and metacognitive skills to science reading comprehension of middle school English learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 42(2), 150–163 http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=&AN=vdc.100084320700.0x00000 1&site=eds-liveeng
dcterms.referencesÁvila, N., & Vélez, A. (2016). Comprehension improvement through reading strategies (Master’s thesis) [Universiad de la Sabana, Chía, Colombia.]. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0124-00642012000800004eng
dcterms.referencesAzevedo, R., & Hadwin, A. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition: Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instructional Science, 33(5–6), 367–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-1272-9eng
dcterms.referencesBailey, K. M., & Curtis, A. (2015). Learning about language assessment: dilemmas, decisions, and directions. Cengage Learning.eng
dcterms.referencesBaldonado, A. A., Svetina, D., & Gorin, J. (2015). Using necessary information to identify item dependence in passage-based reading comprehension tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 28(3), 202–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2015.1042154eng
dcterms.referencesBanegas, D. (2015). A look at ethical issues in action research in education. Argentinian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 58–67. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295399800_GV9Jm2u7rmsCe65wKzPTw5jtS38n2tVEGi_research_in_educationeng
dcterms.referencesBarakhtenko, E., & Sokolov, D. (2019). An architecture of the technology platform for computer modeling, design, and optimization of intelligent integrated energy systems. In 2019 International Multi-Conference on Industrial Engineering and Modern Technologies (FarEastCon), Industrial Engineering and Modern Technologies (FarEastCon), 2019 International Multi-Conference on (pp. 1–5). http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=&AN=edseee.8934678&site=edsliveeng
dcterms.referencesBattelle for Kids. (2015). P21 Framework Definitions. http://static.battelleforkids.org/documents/p21/P21_Framework_Definitions_New_Logo_20 15_9pgs.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesBax, S. (2013). The cognitive processing of candidates during reading tests: evidence from eyetracking. Language Testing, 30(4), 441–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532212473244eng
dcterms.referencesBazeley, P. (2008). Mixed methods in management research. In R. Thorpe & R. Holt (Eds.), The SAGE Dictionary of Qualitative Management Research (Sage, pp. 133–136). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238560747_LgjH2m5c8emE66pjdExmgep47BAd KTrCJ7cheng
dcterms.referencesBlanco, J. X., & Parra, D. A. (2016). Development of A1 L2 learners’ literal reading comprehension of short online animated stories through vocabulary pre-reading activities [Universidad de La Sabana,]. http://hdl.handle.net/10818/28543eng
dcterms.referencesBlaxter, L., Hughes, C., & Tight, M. (2010). How to research (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. https://doi.org/10.2307/1319404eng
dcterms.referencesBloom, B., Mesia, B., & Krathwohl, D. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives (two vol The affective domain & The cognitive domain). Longmans. https://www.uky.edu/~rsand1/china2018/texts/Bloom et al -Taxonomy of Educational Objectives.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesBroom, Y., & Jewson, D. (2013). The stanford diagnostic reading test: Assessing english reading comprehension and vocabulary in South Africa. Per Linguam: A Journal of Language, 29(2), 1–16. http://reference.sabinet.co.za/sa_epublication_article/perling_v29_n2_a2eng
dcterms.referencesBrush, T. A., & Saye, J. W. (2002). A summary of research exploring hard and soft scaffolding for teachers and students using a multimedia supported learning environment. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 1(2), 1–12. http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/1.2.3.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesBuckingham, D. (2007). Digital media literacies: Rethinking media education in the age of the internet. Research in Comparative and International Education, 2(1), 43–55. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ901647&site=eds-liveeng
dcterms.referencesBurns, A. (1999). Collaborative Action Research for English Teachers. Cambridge University Presseng
dcterms.referencesButler, S., Urrutia, K., Buenger, A., & Hunt, M. (2010). A review of the current research on comprehension instruction. National Reading Technical Assistance Centre. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.047eng
dcterms.referencesCain, K., & Oakhill, J. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing, 11(5/6), 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008084120205eng
dcterms.referencesCain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2006). Assessment matters: Issues in the measurement of reading comprehension. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 697–708. http://10.0.5.68/000709905X69807eng
dcterms.referencesCarlson, S. E., van den Broek, P., McMaster, K., Rapp, D. N., Bohn-Gettler, C. M., Kendeou, P., & White, M. J. (2014). Effects of comprehension skill on inference generation during reading. International Journal of Disability, Development & Education, 61(3), 258–274. http://10.0.4.56/1034912X.2014.934004eng
dcterms.referencesCarranza, A. V. (2017). What is language for sociolinguists? The variationist, ethnographic, and conversation-analytic ontologies of language. Linguistik Online, 83(4), 115–131. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsglr&AN=edsgcl.501084840&sit e=eds-liveeng
dcterms.referencesCasallas Acosta, M. C., & Calderón D’Martino, S. (2016). Desarrollo de la inferencia y comunicación de conclusiones a partir de la evidencia científica en la asignatura de física, mediante el uso de las TIC (Master’s thesis) [Universidad de la Sabana, Chía, Colombia]. http://hdl.handle.net/10818/27650eng
dcterms.referencesCastello, E. (2008). Text complexity and reading comprehension tests. Peter Lang AG, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften.eng
dcterms.referencesChan, S., Inoue, C., & Taylor, L. (2015). Developing rubrics to assess the reading-into-writing skills: A case study. Assessing Writing, 26, 20–37. http://10.0.3.248/j.asw.2015.07.004eng
dcterms.referencesCheck, D. K., Wolf, L. E., Dame, L. A., & Beskow, L. M. (2014). Certificates of confidentiality and informed consent: Perspectives of IRB chairs and institutional legal counsel. IRB Ethics and Human Research, 36(1), 1–8eng
dcterms.referencesChen, C., & Law, V. (2016). Scaffolding individual and collaborative game-based learning in learning performance and intrinsic motivation. Computers in Human Behavior, 55(Part B), 1201–1212. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.010eng
dcterms.referencesChen, L. (2015). Taiwanese EFL Learners’ perceived use of online reading strategies. IAFOR Journal of Education, 3(2), 68–80. https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1100686eng
dcterms.referencesClinton, V., Carlson, S. E., & Seipel, B. (2016). Linguistic markers of inference generation while reading. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 45(3), 553–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9360-8eng
dcterms.referencesCorbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (Fourth ed.). SAGE Publications.eng
dcterms.referencesCouncil of Europe. (2001). The Common European Framework of reference for languages : learning, teaching, assessment. Council of Europe, 1–273. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190514000221eng
dcterms.referencesCummins, J. (1987). Empowering minority students. Harvard Educational Review, 56. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.56.1.b327234461607787eng
dcterms.referencesDabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2005). Using web-based pedagogical tools as scaffolds for selfregulated learning. Instructional Science: An International Journal of Learning and Cognition, 33, 513-6), 513–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-1278-3eng
dcterms.referencesDenton, C. A., York, M. J., Francis, D. J., Haring, C., Ahmed, Y., & Bidulescu, A. (2017). An investigation of an intervention to promote inference generation by adolescent poor comprehenders. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice (Wiley-Blackwell), 32(2), 85– 98. http://10.0.4.87/ldrp.12134eng
dcterms.referencesDictionarist.com. (2019). Dictionarist (1.2). https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/dictionarist-instantdict/npggnghnhkgioladlpfehafajnghlklc?hl=eseng
dcterms.referencesDressler, C., Carlo, M., Snow, C., August, D., & White, C. (2011). Spanish-speaking students use of cognate knowledge to infer the meaning of English words. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(2), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728910000519eng
dcterms.referencesDriscoll, D. L., Salib, P., & Rupert, D. J. (2007). Merging qualitative and quantitative data in mixed methods research : how to and why not. 18–28.eng
dcterms.referencesDymock, S. (2012). Teaching reading comprehension : The what, the how, the why (T. Nicholson (ed.)). Wellington, New Zealand : NZCER Presseng
dcterms.referencesElleman, A. (2017). Examining the impact of inference instruction on the literal and inferential comprehension of skilled and less skilled readers: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(6), 761–782.eng
dcterms.referencesElwér, Å., Gustafson, S., Byrne, B., Olson, R. K., Keenan, J. M., & Samuelsson, S. (2015). A retrospective longitudinal study of cognitive and language skills in poor reading comprehension. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 56(2), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12188eng
dcterms.referencesESOL. (2003). Cambridge Preliminary English Test 2. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/0521754674eng
dcterms.referencesFisher, D., & Lapp, D. (2009). Essential readings on comprehension. International Reading Association. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=539062&lang=es&site =ehost-live&scope=siteeng
dcterms.referencesFriedman, C. (1984). The construct validation of second language proficiency tests with different native language groups (Doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Indiana, The United States of America.eng
dcterms.referencesGirón-García, C. (2015). Literacy and Technologies in EFL Settings: Fostering Reading Comprehension on the Internet. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature VO - 8, 8(2), 69. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/jtl3.616eng
dcterms.referencesGoldman, N. (2014). Rewordify (1.0). Rewordify. https://rewordify.com/eng
dcterms.referencesGómez, J. (2017). Developing reading comprehension through graphic organizers in CLIL (Master’s thesis) [Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia]. https://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/handle/10818/30303eng
dcterms.referencesGorard, S. (2012). Mixed methods in educational research. Mixed Methods Research in Education: Some Challenges and Possibilities. http://www.uv.uio.no/ils/personer/vit/kirstik/publikasjoner-pdf-filer/klette.-mixedmethods.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesGusrayani, D. (2014). Developing students’ knowledge from the results of scaffolding in English teaching. English Review: Journal of English Education, 3(1), 1–10. http://journal.uniku.ac.id/index.php/ERJEEeng
dcterms.referencesHall, C. (2016). Inference instruction for struggling readers: A synthesis of intervention research. Educational Psychology Review, 28(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9295-xeng
dcterms.referencesHamada, M. (2009). Development of L2 word-meaning inference while reading. System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 37(3), 447–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.03.003eng
dcterms.referencesHammersley, M. (1993). On the teacher as researcher. Educational Action Research, 1(3), 425– 445. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0965079930010308eng
dcterms.referencesHarris, K. (2015). Integrating digital literacy into English language instruction: Issue brief. https://lincs.ed.gov/sites/default/files/ELL_Digital_Literacy_508.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesHassanzadeh, Z., Tamjid, N. H., Ahangari, S., & Agudo, J. de D. M. (2019). The effect of lexical inference strategy instruction on Iranian EFL learners’ vocabulary depth and breadth. In Cogent Education (Vol. 6, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1614750eng
dcterms.referencesHelpScout. (2020). Padlet. https://es.padlet.com/eng
dcterms.referencesInnovativeWorld. (2018). Voice Notes - Speech to Text Notes (1.2). https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.voicenotes.speech.ideaappeng
dcterms.referencesJust, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87(4), 329–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033- 295X.87.4.329eng
dcterms.referencesKara, S. (2019). Learning autonomy, digital learners and Google Education: A rhizomatic English syllabus framework. The EUROCALL Review, 27(1), 30–47. https://polipapers.upv.es/index.php/eurocall/article/view/10709/12010eng
dcterms.referencesKeedy, J. L., & Simpson, D. S. (2001). Principal priorities, school norms, and teacher influence: A study of sociocultural leadership in the high school. Journal of Educational Administration and Foundations, 16(1), 10–41.eng
dcterms.referencesKendeou, P., Papadopoulos, T. C., & Spanoudis, G. (2012). Processing demands of reading comprehension tests in young readers. Learning and Instruction, 22(5), 354–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.02.001eng
dcterms.referencesKeser, H., & Özdamli, F. (2012). What are the trends in collaborative learning studies in 21st century? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 157–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2012.05.086eng
dcterms.referencesKhalid, M. S., Sutoyo, E., Mungad, M., Sari, E. N., & Herawan, T. (2014). Teaching and learning using computers: how should we tread on its’ changing technology? International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 9(5), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v9i5.3943eng
dcterms.referencesKibui, A. W. (2012). Reading and comprehension in the African context : A cognitive enquiry. Zapf Chancery Publishers Africa Ltd. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=581750&lang=es&site =ehost-live&scope=siteeng
dcterms.referencesKopitski, M. (2007). Exploring the teaching of inference skills [Hamline University]. https://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/hse_all/340eng
dcterms.referencesKothari, C., Kumar, R., & Uusitalo, O. (2014). Research Methodology. New Age International. https://doi.org/http://196.29.172.66:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/2574/1/Research%20 Methodology.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesLamb, T., Gao, X., & Murray, G. (2011). Identity, motivation and autonomy in language learning. (Issue Vol. 54). Multilingual Matters. https://login.ez.unisabana.edu.co/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct= true&AuthType=ip&db=nlebk&AN=370760&lang=es&site=eds-live&scope=siteeng
dcterms.referencesLanger, L. (2010). Empower English language learners with tools from the web. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=1046136&site=edsliveeng
dcterms.referencesLeaver, B., & Stryker, S. (1997). Content-based instruction in foreign language education. Georgetown University Presseng
dcterms.referencesLee, J. K., & Calandra, B. (2004). Can embedded annotations help high school students perform problem solving tasks using a web-based historical document? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2004.10782426eng
dcterms.referencesLogan, J. (2017). Pressure points in reading comprehension: A quantile multiple regression analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(4), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000150eng
dcterms.referencesMason, D. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching. A guide for practitioners. System, 38(3), 196–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.06.005eng
dcterms.referencesMcKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99(3), 440– 466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.3.440eng
dcterms.referencesMcNiff, J. (2013). Action research : Principles and practice (3rd Ed.). Routledgeeng
dcterms.referencesMeskill, C. (2005). Triadic scaffolds: tools for teaching english language learners with computers. Language Learning & Technology, 9(1), 46–59. https://doi.org/10125/44008eng
dcterms.referencesMinisterio de Educación Nacional. (2013). Orientaciones para la implementacion de proyectos de fortalecimiento del inglés en las entidades territoriales. http://www.colombiaaprende.edu.co/html/micrositios/1752/articles-315518_recurso_5.pdfspa
dcterms.referencesMontelongo, J. (2011). Using congnates to scaffold context clue strategies for latino els. Reading Teacher, 64(6), 429–435.eng
dcterms.referencesMuñoz Melo, A. H., & Guayacán Velasco, L. A. (2018). Developing high school students 19 reading comprehension and self-directed learning strategies through the use of digital learning objects. http://hdl.handle.net/10818/34113eng
dcterms.referencesNarvaez, D., van den Broek, P., & Ruiz, A. B. (1999). The influence of reading purpose on inference generation and comprehension in reading. In Journal of Educational Psychology (Vol. 91, Issue 3, pp. 488–496). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.488eng
dcterms.referencesNation, K. (2008). Children’s reading comprehension difficulties. In The science of reading: A handbook. (pp. 248–266). https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1002/9780470757642.ch14eng
dcterms.referencesNational Education Association. (2014). Preparing 21st century students for a global society: An Educator’s Guide to the “ Four Cs .” 1–38.eng
dcterms.referencesNunan, D. (1992). Research Methods in Language Learning. Cambridge University Press.eng
dcterms.referencesNunan, D. (1980). Nine steps to learner autonomy. Symposium 2003, 193–204. http://www.su.se/polopoly_fs/1.84007.1333707257!/menu/standard/file/2003_11_Nunan_e ng.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesOrtiz Moreno, P. A., & Aldana Olarte, R. A. (2017). La estimulación del pensamiento crítico en los estudiantes del grado quinto de primaria del colegio San Simón de Bogotá, a partir de un ambiente de aprendizaje enmarcado en una estrategia de aprendizaje significativo [Universidad de la Sabana, Chía, Colombia]. http://hdl.handle.net/10818/29859eng
dcterms.referencesPhillips, L. (1989). Developing and validating assessments of inference ability in reading comprehension. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/18034eng
dcterms.referencesPonce, O. A. (2015). Mixed methods research in education: Capturing the complexity of the profession. International Journal of Educational Excellence, 1(1), 111–135. https://doi.org/10.18562/IJEE.2015.0005eng
dcterms.referencesPoonpon, K. (2010). Linguistic insights : Text complexity and reading comprehension tests. In E. Castello (Ed.), Studies in Second Language Acquisition (p. 352). Bern, CH: Peter Lang AG, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften. https://doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0272263110000197eng
dcterms.referencesQuan, Z. Z. (2011). Inferencia léxica como método de ampliación de vocabulario en el aprendizaje del chino moderno. Sintagma: Revista de Linguistica, 23(1), 99–114. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=&AN=74265436&site=eds-livespa
dcterms.referencesRaes, A., Schellens, T., De Wever, B., & Vanderhoven, E. (2012). Scaffolding information problem solving in web-based collaborative inquiry learning. Computers and Education, 59(1), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.010eng
dcterms.referencesRaudszus, H., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2018). Lexical quality and executive control predict children’s first and second language reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 31(2), 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9791-8eng
dcterms.referencesRead, J. (2008). Identifying academic language needs through diagnostic assessment. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(3), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.001eng
dcterms.referencesReed, D. K., & Lynn, D. (2016). The effects of an inference-making strategy taught with and without goal setting. Learning Disability Quarterly, 39(3), 133–145. http://10.0.4.153/0731948715615557eng
dcterms.referencesReynolds, D., & Daniel, S. (2018). Toward contingency in scaffolding reading comprehension: Next steps for research. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(3), 367–373. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1183261&site=edsliveeng
dcterms.referencesRibeiro, I., Cadime, I., Freitas, T., & Viana, F. L. (2016). Beyond word recognition, fluency, and vocabulary: The influence of reasoning on reading comprehension. Australian Journal of Psychology, 68(2), 107–115. http://10.0.4.87/ajpy.12095eng
dcterms.referencesRichard-Amato, P. (1988). Making it happen: Interaction in the second language classroom: from theory to practice (Longman). Longman.eng
dcterms.referencesRiffo, B., Reyes, F., & Novoa, A. (2014). Competencia léxica, comprensión lectora y rendimiento académico en estudiantes de enseñanza media. Literatura y Lingüística, 30, 165–180. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0716-58112014000200009spa
dcterms.referencesSarroub, L. K., & Pearson, P. D. (1998). Two steps forward , three steps back : The stormyeng
dcterms.referencesSaye, J., & Brush, T. (2001). The Use of Embedded Scaffolds with Hypermedia-Supported Student-Centered Learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10(4), 333–356. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/8439eng
dcterms.referencesSchnotz, W., & Heiß, A. (2009). Semantic scaffolds in hypermedia learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 371–380. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.016eng
dcterms.referencesShin, S., Brush, T. A., & Glazewski, K. D. (2017). Designing and implementing web-based scaffolding tools for technology-enhanced socioscientific inquiry. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 1–12. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1874038485?accountid=45375eng
dcterms.referencesSmeby, J. (2012). How can qualitative and quantitative data sets be linked? Norwegian Educational Research towards 2020 - UTDANNING2020. http://www.uv.uio.no/ils/personer/vit/kirstik/publikasjoner-pdf-filer/klette.-mixedmethods.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesSmit, J., & Eerde, H. (2011). A teacher’s learning process in dual design research: learning to scaffold language in a multilingual mathematics classroom. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 43(6), 889–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0350-5eng
dcterms.referencesSmit, N., van de Grift, W., de Bot, K., & Jansen, E. (2017). A classroom observation tool for scaffolding reading comprehension. System, 65, 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.12.014eng
dcterms.referencesSnow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding : Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. RAND Corporation. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=72760&lang=es&site= ehost-live&scope=siteeng
dcterms.referencesSoliman, N. A. (2016). Teaching English for academic purposes via the flipped learning approach. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232(April), 122–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.036eng
dcterms.referencesSönmez, Y., & Sulak, S. E. (2018). The effect of the thinking-aloud strategy on the reading comprehension skills of 4th grade primary school students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(1), 168–172. http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1165440eng
dcterms.referencesStrong, J. Z., Amendum, S. J., & Conradi Smith, K. (2018). Supporting elementary students’ reading of difficult texts. Reading Teacher, 72(2), 201–212. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pbh&AN=131500560&site=edsliveeng
dcterms.referencesStryker, S. B., & Leaver, B. Lou. (1997). Content-based instruction in foreign language education: models and methods. Georgetown University Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=21648&lang=es&site= ehost-live&scope=siteeng
dcterms.referencesThapa-Chhetry, B., & Keck, T. (2019). A Chrome app for improving reading comprehension of health information online for individuals with low health literacy. 2019 IEEE/ACM 1st International Workshop on Software Engineering for Healthcare, 57. https://doi.org/10.1109/SEH.2019.00018eng
dcterms.referencesTong, X., Deacon, S. H., Kirby, J. R., Cain, K., & Parrila, R. (2011). Morphological awareness: a key to understanding poor reading comprehension in English. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023495 Tudor, I. (2001). The dynamics of the language classroom: From method to postmethod.eng
dcterms.referencesvan de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6eng
dcterms.referencesvan der Schoot, M., & Studies, E. (2016). Training inference making skills using a situation model approach improves reading comprehension. Paper Presented at the 23th Annual Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading (SSSR), Symposium “Reading Comprehension: From Assessment to Training”, Porto, Portugal. https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/f5a21df7-6763-4768-b06d-348802544282eng
dcterms.referencesVarga-Atkins, T., Mcisaac, J., & Willis, I. (2017). Focus group meets nominal group technique: an effective combination for student evaluation. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 54(4), 289–300. http://10.0.4.56/14703297.2015.1058721eng
dcterms.referencesVázquez, M. (1990). A longitudinal study of cohort academic success and bilingual education (Ph.D. dissertation). University of Rochester, New York, The United States of Americaeng
dcterms.referencesVillanueva, M. L., Ruiz-Madrid, M. N., & Luzón, M. J. (2010). Digital Genres, New Literacies and Autonomy in Language Learning. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. https://login.ez.unisabana.edu.co/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct= true&AuthType=ip&db=nlebk&AN=524301&lang=es&site=eds-live&scope=siteeng
dcterms.referencesVygotsky, L., Hanfmann, E., & Vakar, G. (1962). Thought and language. https://doi.org/10.1037/11193-000eng
dcterms.referencesVygotsky, L., & Mead, G. H. (1986). The phenomenology of language acquisition. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=lxh&AN=ISTA2102101&site=edsliveeng
dcterms.referencesWesche, M. B., & Paribakht, T. (2009). Lexical Inferencing in a First and Second Language : Cross-linguistic Dimensions. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692245eng
dcterms.referencesWestwood, P. (2001). Reading and learning difficulties: approaches to teaching and assessment. Acer Press.eng
dcterms.referencesWestwood, P. (2008). What teachers need to know about reading and writing difficulties. Aust Council for Ed Research.eng
dcterms.referencesWiegerová, A., & Lampertová, A. (2013). A teacher’s diary as a valid tool. https://repozytorium.ukw.edu.pl/bitstream/handle/item/1769/Adriana Wiegerova Alena Lampertova A Teacher’s Diary As A Research Instrument.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=yeng
dcterms.referencesWiggins, G. (2005). Understanding by Design, Expanded 2nd ed. In Understanding by Design. Alexandria Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.eng
dcterms.referencesWilliams, J. C. (2014). Recent official policy and concepts of reading comprehension and inference: the case of England’s primary curriculum. Literacy, 48(2), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12012eng
dcterms.referencesWood, D., & Middleton, D. (1975). A study of assisted problem-solving. British Journal of Psychology, 66(2), 181−191eng
dcterms.referencesWoolley, G. (2011). Reading comprehension : assisting children with learning difficulties Dordrecht : Springer.eng
dcterms.referencesWu, H.-L., Weng, H.-L., & She, H.-C. (2016). Effects of scaffolds and scientific reasoning ability on web-based scientific inquiry. Online Submission, 3, 3. https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED573143eng
dcterms.referencesYurtseven, N., & Altun, S. (2017). Understanding by design (UbD) in EFL teaching: teachers’ professional development and students’ achievement. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 17(2), 437–461. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i3.1204eng
dcterms.referencesZacharias, N. T. (2012). Qualitative Research Methods for Second Language Education : A Coursebook. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=532171&lang=es&site =ehost-live&scope=siteeng
dcterms.referencesZeni, J. (2006). A guide to ethical issues and action research. Educational Action Research, 6(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650799800200053eng
dcterms.referencesZheng, L. (2016). The effectiveness of self-regulated learning scaffolds on academic performance in computer-based learning environments: a meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12564-016- 9426-9eng
dcterms.referencesZhou, Y., & He, J. (2018). Optimizing the wisdom of the crowd: inference, learning, and teaching. http://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09018eng
dcterms.referencesZohrabi, M. (2013). Mixed method research : instruments , validity , reliability and reporting findings. 3(2), 254–262. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.2.254-262eng
dcterms.referencesZwiers, J. (2006). Integrating academic language, thinking, and content: learning scaffolds for non-native speakers in the middle grades. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(4), 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.08.005eng


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
CESAR GARCIA-HERREROS Final ...
Tamaño:
1.147Mb
Formato:
PDF
Descripción:
Ver documento en PDF
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International