Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.advisorDurán Bautista, Diana Carolina
dc.contributor.authorRosales Jurado, Yanira del Carmen
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-25T14:16:59Z
dc.date.available2020-02-25T14:16:59Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-21
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/39683
dc.description81 páginases_CO
dc.description.abstractEste artículo es una revisión sistemática de literatura del enfoque Aprendizaje de Contenidos y Lenguas Extranjeras (AICLE) sobre los estudios de investigación realizados en la Educación terciaria en Latinoamérica en la última década (20008- 2018). El objetivo de esta investigación es indagar sobre los principales factores relacionados a la implementación del enfoque AICLE, tales como las estrategias, las principales asignaturas enseñadas a través de este enfoque, limitaciones relevantes y conocer cuáles son las perspectivas de los estudiantes desde su experiencia sobre la implementación de este enfoque. El principal hallazgo indicó que hay limitada investigación usando el enfoque AICLE en la educación terciaria en Latina América. Por otro lado, aunque, los resultados muestran que las principales limitaciones están relacionadas con la falta de entrenamiento de docentes y el presupuesto que esto abarca, la implementación de AICLE ha generado impacto positivo en la motivación de los aprendices para adquirir un idioma extranjero a través de contenidos de un área específica, y así mismo, desarrollar habilidades de pensamiento crítico, de aprendizaje auto dirigido y desarrollo de habilidades comunicativas. En conclusión, este documento describe algunas recomendaciones, tales como: incluir el enfoque AICLE en los planes de estudio de la educación superior, involucrando docentes y estudiantes para fermentar la motivación de un aprendizaje de un idioma extranjero a través de contenidos de diferentes programas académicos de la educación terciaria y también, este documento, sugiere algunas estrategias sólidas que podrían incluirse en implementaciones de CLIL para ayudarlos a tener más éxito en el aprendizaje de un idioma extranjero.es_CO
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.subjectLenguaje y lenguases_CO
dc.subjectBilingüismoes_CO
dc.subjectAprendizajees_CO
dc.subjectEducación superiores_CO
dc.subjectFormación profesional de maestroses_CO
dc.subjectComunicación en educaciónes_CO
dc.subjectAmérica Latinaes_CO
dc.title​The Current State of the Art of the CLIL Approach in Latin American Tertiary Education: A Systematic Literature Reviewes_CO
dc.typemasterThesises_CO
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigido (Virtual)es_CO
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjerases_CO
dc.identifier.local276186
dc.identifier.localTE10572
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsrestrictedAccesses_CO
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigidoes_CO
dcterms.referencesAguilar, M., & Muñoz, C. (2014). The effect of proficiency on CLIL benefits in Engineering students in S pain. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 1-18.eng
dcterms.referencesAnderson, C. E. (2011). CLIL for CALP in the multilingual, pluricultural, globalized knowledge society: Experiences and backgrounds to L2 English usage among Latin American L1 Spanish-users. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 4(2), 51-66eng
dcterms.referencesArgudo, J., Abad, M., Fajardo-Dack, T., & Cabrera, P. (2018). Analyzing a Pre-Service EFL Program through the Lenses of the CLIL Approach at the University of Cuenca-Ecuador. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 11(1), 65-86eng
dcterms.referencesBanegas, D. L. (2011). A Review of “CLIL: content and language integrated learning” by D. Coyle, P. Hood, and D. Marsh, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010, v+ 173 pp.,£ 54.50/US 71.20(hardback),ISBN978-0-521-11298-7;£21.00/US 25.91 (paperback), ISBN 978-0-521-13021-9; US 71.00(Adobeereader),ISBN978-0-511-74047-3.eng
dcterms.referencesBaetens Beardsmore, H. (1993) European Models of Bilingual Education, Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.eng
dcterms.referencesBanegas, D. L. (2016). Teachers develop CLIL materials in Argentina: A workshop experience. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 9 (1)eng
dcterms.referencesBeltrán, C. G. (2011). Facing CLIL Challenges at University Level. HOW, 18(1), 24-42eng
dcterms.referencesBonces, J. R. (2012). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL): Considerations in the Colombian context. GIST: Education and Learning Research Journal, (6), 177-189eng
dcterms.referencesÇekrezi, R. (2011). CLIL and teacher training. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3821-3825.eng
dcterms.referencesCenoz, J., F. Genesee, and Gorter, D. 2014. “Critical Analysis of CLIL: Taking Stock and Looking Forward.” Applied Linguistics 35 (3), 243–262.eng
dcterms.referencesChang, K. E., Sung, Y., T., & Chen, I., D. (2002). The effect of concept mapping to enhance text comprehension and summarization. The Journal of Experimental Education 71(1), 5-23.eng
dcterms.referencesCohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K., & Morrison, R. B. (2007). Research methods in education” Routledge.eng
dcterms.referencesCommission of the European Communities. (2003). Promoting language learning and linguistic diversity: An action plan 2004–2006.eng
dcterms.referencesCook, V. (2016). Second language learning and language teaching. Routledge.eng
dcterms.referencesCorbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory / Juliet Corbin, Anselm Strauss. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat06493a& AN=sab.000129814&site=eds-liveeng
dcterms.referencesCorrales, K. A., Rey, L. A. P., & Escamilla, N. S. (2016). Is EMI enough? Perceptions from university professors and students. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 9(2).eng
dcterms.referencesCoyle, D. (2014). Analyzing Classroom Language in CLIL. The Routledge Handbook of Educational Linguistics, 353, 353.eng
dcterms.referencesCoyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). Content and language integrated learning. Ernst Klett Sprachen.eng
dcterms.referencesCoyle, D., Holmes, B., & King, L. (2009). Towards an integrated curriculum–CLIL National Statement and Guidelines. The Languages Companyeng
dcterms.referencesDalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classrooms (Vol. 20). John Benjamins Publishingeng
dcterms.referencesDe la Barra, E., Veloso, S., & Maluenda, L. (2018). Integrating Assessment in a CLIL-Based Approach for Second-Year University Students. Profile Issues in TeachersProfessional Development, 20 (2), 111- 126eng
dcterms.referencesde Zarobe, Y. R. (2013). CLIL implementation: From policy-makers to individual initiatives. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16 (3), 231-243eng
dcterms.referencesEducation Information Network in the European Union. (2006). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) at school in Europe. Eurydice.eng
dcterms.referencesEssays, UK. (November 2018). Literature review of concepts and theories of Motivation. Retrieved from https://www.ukessays.com/essays/business/literature-review-ofconcepts-and-theories-of-motivation-business-essay.php?vref=1eng
dcterms.referencesEssays, UK. (November 2018). Methods And Approaches Of English Language Teaching English Language Essay. Retrieved from https://www.ukessays.com/essays/english-language/methods-andapproaches-of-english-language-teaching-english-languageessay.php?vref=1eng
dcterms.referencesFinardi, K. R., & Silveira, N. (2016). First Aid and Waves in English as a Foreign Language: Insights from CLIL in Brazil. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 20(3), 11-30.eng
dcterms.referencesFontecha, A. F., & Alonso, A. C. (2014). A preliminary study on motivation and gender in CLIL and non-CLIL types of instruction. International Journal of English Studies, 14(1), 21-36eng
dcterms.referencesGardner, Jr, T. H. (2009). Vocabulary integration in a content-based international business English program. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning; Vol 2, No 1eng
dcterms.referencesGonzález, A. M. L. (2014). The effect of instruction on Polish Spanish learners’ lexical availability. In Lexical availability in English and Spanish as a second language (pp. 139-168). Springer, Dordrecht.eng
dcterms.referencesGough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2012). An introduction to systematic reviews. London: SAGE Publicationseng
dcterms.referencesHarwell, M. R. (2011). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods: Pursuing ideas as the keystone of exemplary inquir. In The Sage handbook for research in education: Pursuing ideas as the keystone of exemplary inquir. Sage.eng
dcterms.referencesHero, L. M., Lindfors, E., & Taatila, V. (2017). Individual Innovation Competence: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(5), 103-121.eng
dcterms.referencesHillyard, S. (2011). First steps in CLIL: Training the teachers. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 4 (2), 1-12.eng
dcterms.referencesHossler, D., & Scalese-love, P. (1989). Grounded meta-analysis : A guide for research synthesis. The Review of Higher Education, 13(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.1989.0000eng
dcterms.referencesLasagabaster, D. (2013). The use of the L1 in CLIL classes: The teachers’ perspective. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 6(2), 1-21.eng
dcterms.referencesLi, (2002); Lim & Low, (2009); McDougald, (2009). Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning; Colombia. Universidad de la Sabana.eng
dcterms.referencesLin, C. Y. (2014). WIKI-Enhanced Scaffolding to Encourage Student Participation in a Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classroom. International Association for the Development of the Information Society.eng
dcterms.referencesMarsh, D. (2012). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL). A Development Trajectory, 38-50.eng
dcterms.referencesMarsh, D., Mehisto, P., Wolff, D., Aliaga, R., Asikainen, T., Frigols-Martin, M. J., ... & Langé, G. (2009). CLIL practice: perspectives from the field. Rovaniemi/Jyväskylä: CLIL Cascade Network/University of Jyväskylä.eng
dcterms.referencesMcDougald, J. S. (2016). CLIL approaches in education: Opportunities, challenges, or threats?. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 9(2)eng
dcterms.referencesNgeow, Karen Yeok-Hwa ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading English and Communication Bloomington IN, 1998, Digest #138 http://www.ericdigests.org/1999-4/motivation.htmeng
dcterms.referencesNuñez Asomoza, A. (2015). Students' Perceptions of the Impact of CLIL in a Mexican BA Program. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development, 17(2), 111-124.eng
dcterms.referencesOroujlou, N., & Vahedi, M. (2011). Motivation, attitude, and language learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 994-1000eng
dcterms.referencesPetticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.eng
dcterms.referencesPladevall-Ballester, Elisabet. "Exploring primary school CLIL perceptions in Catalonia: students', teachers' and parents' opinions and expectations." International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 18.1 (2015): 45-59eng
dcterms.referencesResearch Methodology (2019). Types of Literature Review. Retrieved from https://research-methodology.net/research-methodology/typesliterature-review/eng
dcterms.referencesSavignon, S. J. (1972). Communicative competence: An experiment in foreign-language teaching (Vol. 12). Marcel Didier.eng
dcterms.referencesSiqueira, D. S. P., Landau, J., & Paraná, R. A. (2018). Innovations and Challenges in CLIL Implementation in South America. Theory Into Practice, 57(3), 196-203eng
dcterms.referencesSnow, M. A., Met, M., & Genesee, F. (1989). A conceptual framework for the integration of language and content in second/foreign language instruction. Tesol Quarterly, 23(2), 201-217.eng
dcterms.referencesSpies, K. (2012). Intercultural studies within a CLIL approach. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 5(1), 33-45eng
dcterms.referencesVan Kampen, E., Admiraal, W., & Berry, A. (2018). Content and language integrated learning in the Netherlands: teachers’ self-reported pedagogical practices. International journal of bilingual education and bilingualism, 21(2), 222-236.eng
dcterms.referencesWielander, E. (2016). Something to talk about: Content and Language Integrated Learning in Modern Languages in British Higher Education. A case study of German at Aston University (Doctoral dissertation, Aston University).eng
dcterms.referencesWorld Bank (IBRD). (2002). Constructing knowledge societies: New challenges for tertiary education. World Bank, Washington, District of Columbia.eng
dcterms.referencesYang, W. (2015). Content and language integrated learning next in Asia: evidence of learners’ achievement in CLIL education from a Taiwan tertiary degree programme. International Journal of Bilingual Education & Bilingualism. (P361-382. 22p). Taiwan. Media.eng
dcterms.referencesYang, W. (2016). An investigation of learning efficacy, management difficulties and improvements in tertiary CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) programmes in Taiwan: A survey of stakeholder perspectives. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 9 (1)eng


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International