Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

The use of lateral thinking puzzles to improve opinion paragraph writing. : thinking puzzles to unpuzzle thinking

dc.contributor.advisorLytvychenko, Valeriya
dc.contributor.authorLeón Corrales, Helga Valeska
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-23T19:09:38Z
dc.date.available2013-05-23T19:09:38Z
dc.date.created2010
dc.date.issued2013-05-23
dc.identifier.citationASPEN, (2008). ASPAEN language arts core document ALAC
dc.identifier.citationBartl, A. ( 2004). 101 Quick thinking games and riddles for children. Publishers group west.
dc.identifier.citationBean, J. (2001). Engaging ideas: the professor’s guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
dc.identifier.citationBrink-Budgen, R. (2000). Critical thinking for students: learn the skills of critical assessment and effective argument. Begbroad, Oxford: How to books.
dc.identifier.citationBrown, H. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. New York: Pearson education.
dc.identifier.citationBrowne, N. & Keeley, S. (2007). Asking the right questions: a guide to critical thinking. New Jersey: Pearson, Prentice Hall
dc.identifier.citationBurns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research fro English language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationCarr, N (2008). Is Google making us stupid? Retrieved July 27, 2008, from: http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200807/google
dc.identifier.citationConnor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric cross-cultural aspects of second language writing. Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationCreswell, J. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
dc.identifier.citationCrist, P. & Scaffa, M. (2004). Best practices in occupational therapy education. Haworth Press.
dc.identifier.citationDamron and High (2008). Enhancing writing and critical thinking through paired courses.
dc.identifier.citationRetrieved September 20, 2009, from: http://www.ciser.ttu.edu/conference/Poster%20Papers/DamronHighPoster.pdf
dc.identifier.citationFerrance, E. (2006). Action research. Northeast and Islands Regional Educational Laboratory, Brown University: Rhode Island.
dc.identifier.citationFerris, D. R (2002). Treatment of error in second language writing. USA: The University of Michigan Press.
dc.identifier.citationJaffar, S. Teaching critical thinking through literature. Journal of research, 2004, vol. 5.
dc.identifier.citationHakes, B. (2008). When critical thinking met English literature: A resource book for teachers and their students. Begbroad, Oxford: How to books.
dc.identifier.citationHarmer, J. (2007). The practice of the English language teaching. England: Pearson, Longman.
dc.identifier.citationHatcher, (1995).
dc.identifier.citationHeacox, D. (2002). Differentiating instruction in the regular classroom: how to reach and teach all learners, grades 3-12. Minneapolis: Free Spirit Publishing Inc.
dc.identifier.citationHertz (1992) in Zaphiris & Zacharia. (2006). User-centered computer aided language learning. British Cataloguing in Publication Data
dc.identifier.citationHopkins, D. (2008). A teacher's guide to classroom research. Open University Press.
dc.identifier.citationHyland, K. (2002). Teaching and researching writing. Great Britain: Pearson education
dc.identifier.citationLanger & Applebee (1987). How writing shapes thinking: A study of teaching and learning. Retrieved October 8, 2009, from http://wac.colostate.edu/books/langer_applebee/
dc.identifier.citationLucas, R. (2007). Creative learning: activities and games that really engage people. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
dc.identifier.citationMason, M. (2008). Critical thinking and learning. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
dc.identifier.citationMills, E. (2007). Action research: a guide for the teacher researcher. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
dc.identifier.citationNorton, L.S. (2009). Action research in teaching and learning: A practical guide to conducting pedagogical research in universities. Routledge Education.
dc.identifier.citation(Quitadamo, I. & Kurtz, M. (2006). Learning to improve: Using Writing to Increase Critical Thinking Performance in General Education Biology. Life Sciences Education Journal. Vol. 6, 140–154, Summer 2007
dc.identifier.citationRichards, J. (1997). The language teaching matrix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationRichards, K., Stillson, A., Recamán, B. et al. (2002). Classic brain teasers. New York: Sterling Publishing.
dc.identifier.citationSagor, R (2005). The action research guidebook: A four-step process for educators and school teams. United Sates of America: Corwin Press
dc.identifier.citationSchmidt, R. & Ma, W. (2006). 50 Literacy strategies for culturally responsive teaching K-8. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
dc.identifier.citationScriven and Richard, (1997). A working definition for critical thinking. Retrieved
dc.identifier.citationSeptember 17, 1997 form: http://lonestar.texas.net/~mseifert/crit2.html
dc.identifier.citationSchafersman, S. (1991). An introduction to critical thinking. Retrieved January15, 2009, from http://www.freeinquiry.com/critical-thinking.html
dc.identifier.citationStapleton, P. (2002). Critical thinking in Japanese L2 writing: rethinking tired constructs. ELT Journal 56(3), 250-257.
dc.identifier.citationSternberg, R. J., & Spear-Swerling, L. (1996). Teaching for thinking. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
dc.identifier.citationStrauss, A. C. and Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and Techniques. Sage Publications, Inc, 2nd edition. Sage Publications, Inc.
dc.identifier.citationStringer, E. T. (2007). Action research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
dc.identifier.citationWallace, (2007). Action research for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
dc.identifier.citationWilliams, M & Burden, R. (1997). Psychology for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/7504
dc.description108 Páginas.
dc.description.abstractEste estudio examina los efectos y beneficios del desarrollo de las habilidades de pensamiento crítico en el mejoramiento de la escritura en la composición de ensayos argumentativos. La investigación fue realizada con un grupo de 23 estudiantes de un colegio de Bogotá. La producción escrita fue analizada teniendo en cuenta los efectos que tuvieron las actividades conocidas como desafíos mentales (brain teasers) en el mejoramiento de las habilidades comunicativas en forma escrita. El estudió se enfocó en el proceso que siguieron las estudiantes con el fin de optimizar su rendimiento. Se concluyó que los desafíos mencionados influyeron en forma positiva y exitosa en el mejoramiento de las habilidades de escritura y motivación de las estudiantes por la escritura.es_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.subjectThe use of lateral thinking puzzles to improve opinion paragraph writing. :thinking puzzles to unpuzzle thinkinges_CO
dc.subjectRendimiento académicoes_CO
dc.subjectPruebas de inteligenciaes_CO
dc.subjectEscrituraes_CO
dc.subjectPsicopedagogíaes_CO
dc.titleThe use of lateral thinking puzzles to improve opinion paragraph writing. : thinking puzzles to unpuzzle thinkinges_CO
dc.typemasterThesis
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomo
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjeras
dc.identifier.local129251
dc.identifier.localTE01321
dc.type.localTesis de maestría
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomo


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
124040.pdf
Tamaño:
1.799Mb
Formato:
PDF
Descripción:
Ver documento en PDF
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem