The development and implementation of a low-cost mechanical ventilator in a low-middle-income country during the COVID-19 pandemic: The Unisabana-HERONS
Item Links
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10818/61988Visitar enlace: https://www.scopus.com/inward/ ...
ISSN: 24058440
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30671
Compartir
Statistics
View Usage StatisticsBibliographic cataloging
Show full item recordAuthor
Giraldo-Cadavid L.F; Echeverry J; Varón-Vega F; Bastidas A; Ramírez-Jaime A; Cardona A.F; Lopez Vega C.J; Serrano-Mayorca C.C; Garay D; Rincón D.N; Oliveros H; Ramírez I.A; Garcia-Gallo E; Enciso-Prieto V.A; Ibáñez-Prada E.D; Camelo J.C; Cucunubo L; Buitrago L; Paipa L.A; Longas L.C; Agudelo-Otálora L.M; Porras Diaz N.F; Rachid R.R; Henao I R.D; Pedraza S; Reyes L.F.Date
2024Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic in Latin America generated the need to develop low-cost, fast-manufacturing mechanical ventilators. The Universidad de La Sabana and the Fundacion Neumologica Colombiana designed and manufactured the Unisabana-HERONS (USH) ventilator. Here, we present the preclinical and clinical study results to evaluate its effectiveness and safety characteristics in an animal model (Yorkshire Sow) and five patients with acute respiratory failure receiving mechanical ventilatory support for 24 h. Methods: The effectiveness and safety outcomes included maintaining arterial blood gases and pulse oximetry saturation (SpO2), respiratory pressures and volumes (during continuous monitoring) in the range of ARDS and lung-protective strategy goals, and the occurrence of barotrauma. A significance level of 0.05 was used for statistical tests. This clinical trial was registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04497623) and approved by the ethics committee. Results: Among patients treated with the Unisabana-HERONS, the most frequent causes of acute respiratory failure were pneumonia in 3/5 (60 %) and ARDS in 2/5 (40 %). During the treatment, the ventilatory parameters related to lung protection protocols were kept within the safety range, and vital signs and blood gas were stable. The percentage of time that the respiratory pressures or volumes were out of safety range were plateau pressure >30 cm H2O: 0.00 %; driving pressure >15 cm H2O: 0.06 %; mechanical power >15 J/min: 0.00 %; and Tidal volume >8 mL/kg: 0.00 %. There were no adverse events related to the ventilator. The usability questionnaire retrieved a median score for all items between 9 and 10 (best score: 10), indicating great ease of use. Conclusion: The Unisabana-HERONS ventilator effectively provided adequate gas exchange and maintained the ventilatory parameters in the range of lung protection strategies in humans and an animal model. Furthermore, it is straightforward to use and is a low-cost medical device. © 2024
Ubication
Heliyon Vol. 10 N° 9 art. e30671
Collections to which it belong
- Facultad de Medicina [1345]