Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.advisorAnderson, Carl Edlund
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Valencia, Oscar Mauricio
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-26T20:54:39Z
dc.date.available2021-02-26T20:54:39Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-10
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/47001
dc.description121 páginases_CO
dc.description.abstractThis qualitative research study aimed to identify the skills that benefit academic writing and should be fostered during elementary school years through the teachers’ personal beliefs and perceptions. The participants were 30 male and female primary teachers between 25 and 60 years old from a private school in Cali, Colombia. The study combined a fixed mixed-emergent method analysis of quantitative and qualitative data with equal priority and weight to the instruments (Onwuegbuzie & Combs, 2015). The timing was concurrent, making the validation of findings an on-going process throughout the general quantitative-qualitative procedures, analyzing instruments simultaneously through a questionnaire for all teachers, an interview with an expert in linguistics, and a focus group. Grounded theory was used to analyze all the participants’ answers and code them to provide the different subcategories, categories, and one core category. It was concluded that self-awareness and self-alertness are significant factors in developing meaningful literacy skills that directly affect structured writing abilities and academic writing skills.es_CO
dc.description.abstractEste estudio de investigación cualitativa tuvo como objetivo identificar las habilidades que benefician la escritura académica y deben fomentarse durante los años de la escuela primaria a través de las creencias y percepciones personales de los maestros. Los participantes fueron 30 maestros y maestras de primaria entre 25 y 60 años de una escuela privada en Cali, Colombia. El estudio combinó un análisis de método fijo mixto emergente de datos cuantitativos y cualitativos con igual prioridad y peso para los instrumentos. La sincronización de los tiempos fue concurrente, haciendo de la validación de hallazgos un proceso continuo a lo largo de los procedimientos generales cuantitativos-cualitativos, analizando los instrumentos simultáneamente a través de un cuestionario para todos los docentes, una entrevista con un experto en lingüística y un grupo focal. Se utilizó la teoría fundamentada para analizar todas las respuestas de los participantes y codificarlas para proporcionar las diferentes subcategorías, categorías y una categoría principal. Se concluyó que la autoconciencia y la auto alerta son factores importantes en el desarrollo de habilidades de alfabetización significativas que afectan directamente las habilidades de escritura estructurada y las habilidades de escritura académica.spa
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.sourcereponame:Intellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.titleAcademic writing in colombia: fostering skills in the early yearses_CO
dc.typemasterThesises_CO
dc.identifier.local280886
dc.identifier.localTE11168
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsrestrictedAccesses_CO
dc.subject.armarcEscritos académicosspa
dc.subject.armarcAprendizajespa
dc.subject.armarcAptitud pedagógicaspa
dc.subject.armarcAlfabetización (Educación)spa
dcterms.referencesAdams, K. (2016). Expressive writing: Foundations of practice. In Kathleen Adams (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mental health (2nd ed., pp. 204–210). Lanham R&L Education.en
dcterms.referencesAhangari, S., & Babapour, M. (2015). The effect of self-correction and peer-correction on EFL learners ’ writing. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 5(2), 465–473.en
dcterms.referencesAhern, A., Whittaker, R., & Sánchez, I. (2018). Reading and writing to learn: A principled approach to practice in CLIL/Bilingual classes. E-TEALS: An e-Journal of Teacher Education and Applied Language Studies, 9(1), 23–40.en
dcterms.referencesAkdal, D., & Şahin, A. (2014). The effects of intertextual reading approach on the development of creative writing skills. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 14(54), 171–186. http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2014.54.10en
dcterms.referencesAlden, K. S. (2018). Creative writing innovations and old and new, tried and untried. Journal of Creative Writing, 3(1), 1–6.en
dcterms.referencesAlon, N., Yuster, R., & Zwick, U. (1995). Color-coding. Journal of the ACM, 42(4), 844–856. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/210332.210337en
dcterms.referencesAnderson, C. E., & Cuesta-Medina, L. (2019). Beliefs and practices concerning academic writing among postgraduate language-teacher trainees. Íkala, 24(1), 29–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v24n01a01en
dcterms.referencesAnderson, C. E., McDougald, J. S., & Cuesta Medina, L. (2015). CLIL for young learners. In N. Giannikas, L. McLaughlin, G. Fanning, & N. Muller (Eds.), Children learning English: From research to practice (pp. 137–151). Garnet.en
dcterms.referencesAnderson, C. E., Mora González, C. A., & Cuesta Medina, L. M. (2018). Graphic organizers support young L2 writers’ argumentative skills. GIST-Education and Learning Research Journal, 2(17), 6–33.en
dcterms.referencesAndrews, R., Torgerson, C., Low, G., & McGuinn, N. (2009). Teaching argument writing to 7‐ to 14‐year‐olds: An international review of the evidence of successful practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(3), 291–310.en
dcterms.referencesArksey, H., & Knight, P. (2011). Triangulation in data collection. In Interviewing for Social Scientists (pp. 21–31). London, UK: SAGE Publications, Ltd. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781849209335.n2en
dcterms.referencesArmstrong, T. (2003). The multiple intelligences of reading and writing: Making the words come alive. Alexandria, V: ASCD.en
dcterms.referencesArumugam M. Pillay, L., Kaur Swaran Singh, C., Nor Safinas Raja Harun, R., & Singh Masa Singh, T. (2019). The implementation of higher order thinking skills for teaching and learning. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, (54), 957–964. http://dx.doi.org/10.32861//jssr.54.957.964en
dcterms.referencesAskehave, I. (2001). Genre identification and communicative purpose: A problem and a possible solution. Applied Linguistics, 22(2), 195–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.2.195en
dcterms.referencesAukerman, M. (2007). A culpable CALP: Rethinking the conversational/academic language proficiency distinction in early literacy instruction. The Reading Teacher, 60(7), 626–635. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/rt.60.7.3en
dcterms.referencesAyala, Z., Álvarez, J., & Aldemar, J. (2017). A perspective of the implications of the Common European Framework implementation in the Colombian socio-cultural context. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, (7), 7–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.14483/22487085.162en
dcterms.referencesAzimova, S. (2019). The communicative approach in English language teaching. Bulletin of Science and Practice, 5(4), 471–475.en
dcterms.referencesBaddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 556–559. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1736359en
dcterms.referencesBæck, U.-D. K. (2017). It is the air that we breathe: Academic socialization as a key component for understanding how parents influence children’s schooling. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 3(2), 123–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2017.1372008en
dcterms.referencesBaralt, M. (2012). Coding qualitative data. In Research Methods in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 222–244). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444347340.ch12en
dcterms.referencesBen-Peretz, M., Mendelson, N., & Kron, F. W. (2003). How teachers in different educational contexts view their roles. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(2), 277–290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00100-2en
dcterms.referencesBerland, L. K., & McNeill, K. L. (2010). A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts. Science Education, 94(5), 765–793. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.20402en
dcterms.referencesBerlin, J. (1988). Rhetoric and ideology in the writing class. College English, 50(5), 477–494.en
dcterms.referencesBilling, D. (2007). Teaching for transfer of core/key skills in higher education: Cognitive skills. Higher Education, 53(4), 483–516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-005-5628-5en
dcterms.referencesBirmingham, P. (2003). Using research instruments. London, UK: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203422991en
dcterms.referencesBishop, W., & Starkey, D. (2006). Keywords in creative writing. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.en
dcterms.referencesBisson, M., Heuven, W. J. B., Conklin, K., & Tunney, R. J. (2014). The role of repeated exposure to multimodal input in incidental acquisition of foreign language vocabulary. Language Learning, 64(4), 855–877. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lang.12085en
dcterms.referencesBizzell, P. (1986). What happens when basic writers come to college? College Composition and Communication, 37(3), 294. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/358046en
dcterms.referencesBlanpain, K. (2008). Review of goals for academic writing: ESL students and their instructors. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 156, 335–337.en
dcterms.referencesBlanton, M. (1982). Bloom’s taxonomy revisited. G/C/T, 5(4), 22–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107621758200500408en
dcterms.referencesBlommaert, J. (2013). Writing as a sociolinguistic object. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 17(4), 440–459.en
dcterms.referencesBloom, B. (1957). Learning domains or Bloom’s taxonomy. Global Forum, 17–18en
dcterms.referencesBornstein, M. H., & Gardner, H. (1986). Frames of Mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 20(2), 120. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3332707en
dcterms.referencesBowen, T., & Whithaus, C. (2013). Multimodal literacies and emerging genres. Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh Press.en
dcterms.referencesBrown, H. (2000). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Longman.en
dcterms.referencesBrown, A. (2009). Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of effective foreign language teaching: A comparison of ideals. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 46–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00827.xen
dcterms.referencesBryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2007). The SAGE handbook of Grounded Theory. London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848607941en
dcterms.referencesBull, R., Espy, K. A., & Wiebe, S. A. (2008). Short-term memory, working memory, and executive functioning in preschoolers: Longitudinal predictors of mathematical achievement at age 7 years. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33(3), 205–228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/87565640801982312en
dcterms.referencesCaine, R. N., Caine, G., McClintic, C., & Klimek, K. J. (2016). Why relaxed alertness provides the optimum emotional climate for learning. In 12 Brain/Mind Learning Principles in Action (pp. 20–32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483394275.n2en
dcterms.referencesCalle, G. Y. (2017). Perspective of writing centers in Colombia. Hallazgos, 28(1), 145–172en
dcterms.referencesCameron, R. (2009). A sequential mixed model research design: Design, analytical and display issues. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3(2), 140–152. http://dx.doi.org/10.5172/mra.3.2.140en
dcterms.referencesCárdenas-Hagan, E., Carlson, C. D., & Pollard-Durodola, S. D. (2007). The cross-linguistic transfer of early literacy skills: The role of initial L1 and L2 skills and language of instruction. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 38(3), 249–259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2007/026)en
dcterms.referencesCárdenas, M. L. (2006). Bilingual Colombia: Are we ready for it? What is needed? 19th Annual English Australia Education Conference 2006: Re-Evaluating Methodologies: How We Teach, Who We Teach, 5, 978–993.en
dcterms.referencesCarey, S. (1988). Conceptual differences between children and adults. Mind & Language, 3(3), 167–181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.1988.tb00141.xen
dcterms.referencesCervetti, G., Damico, J., Pearson, P. D., & Education, T. (2000). Multiple literacies, new literacies, and teacher education. Theory Into Practice, 45(4), 378–386.en
dcterms.referencesCharmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltden
dcterms.referencesCollins, J. L., Lee, J., Fox, J. D., & Madigan, T. P. (2017). Bringing together reading and writing: An experimental study of writing intensive reading comprehension in lowperforming urban elementary schools. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(3), 311–332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rrq.175en
dcterms.referencesConnelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2–14.en
dcterms.referencesCorbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00988593en
dcterms.referencesCorbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153en
dcterms.referencesCorrea, A., Usma, D., & Montoya, J. (2014). Colombia national bilingual program: An exploratory study in the department of Antioquia, Colombia. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 19(1), 101–116en
dcterms.referencesCoulmas, F. (1989). The writing systems of the world. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.en
dcterms.referencesCoulmas, F. (1991). The writing systems of the world. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.en
dcterms.referencesCoulmas, F. (1996). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.en
dcterms.referencesCreswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publicationsen
dcterms.referencesCreswell, J. W. (2009). Research design qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London, UK: SAGE Publicationsen
dcterms.referencesCreswell, J. W., Hanson, W. E., Clark Plano, V. L., & Morales, A. (2007). Qualitative research designs: Selection and implementation. The Counseling Psychologist, 35(2), 236–264en
dcterms.referencesCristofori, I., Cohen-Zimerman, S., & Grafman, J. (2019). Executive functions. In M. D’Esposito & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of Clinical Neurology (pp. 197–219). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier B.V. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804281-6.00011-2en
dcterms.referencesCrosby, R. A. (2004). Teaching and researching writingELT Journal (Vol. 1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/57.1.85en
dcterms.referencesCrosby, R. A., DiClemente, R. J., & Salazar, L. F. (2015). Introduction to scientific writing. Research Methods in Health Promotion, 16(582), 493–523en
dcterms.referencesCummins, J. (1978). Bilingualism and the development of metalinguistic awareness. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 9(2), 131–149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002202217892001en
dcterms.referencesCummins, Jim. (2008). BICS and CALP: Empirical and theoretical status of the distinction. In B. Street & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Language and Education (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 71–83). New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media LLC. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3588206en
dcterms.referencesD’Mello, S., & Graesser, A. (2012). Dynamics of affective states during complex learning. Learning and Instruction, 22(2), 145–157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.10.001en
dcterms.referencesDarling-Hammond, L., Holtzman, D. J., Gatlin, S. J., & Vasquez Heilig, J. (2005). Does teacher preparation matter? Evidence about teacher certification, teach for America, and teacher effectiveness. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(42), 1–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v13n42.2005en
dcterms.referencesDe Bono, E. (1970). Lateral thinking: A textbook of creativity. London, UK: Penguin Books.en
dcterms.referencesDe Saussure, F. (1959). Course in general linguistics (B. Charles & A. Sechehaye, Eds.). New York, NY: The Philosophical Libraryen
dcterms.referencesDeane, P. (2018). The challenges of writing in school: Conceptualizing writing development within a sociocognitive framework. Educational Psychologist, 53(4), 280–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1513844en
dcterms.referencesDhungana, V. (1970). Writing with a purpose. Kathmandu University Medical Journal, 7(2), 91. http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/kumj.v7i2.2696en
dcterms.referencesDiamond, A. (2013). Executive Functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 135–168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750en
dcterms.referencesDiamond, A., & Lee, K. (2011). Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4 to 12 years old. Science, 333(6045), 959–964. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1204529en
dcterms.referencesDiPardo, A., & Freedman, S. W. (1988). Peer response groups in the writing classroom: Theoretic foundations and new directions. Review of Educational Research, 58(2), 119– 149. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543058002119en
dcterms.referencesDixon, F. A., Yssel, N., McConnell, J. M., & Hardin, T. (2014). Differentiated instruction, professional development, and teacher efficacy. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37(2), 111–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016235321452904en
dcterms.referencesDonovan, S. K. (2007). How to write a lot: A practical guide to productive academic writing (review). Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 39(1), 351–355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/scp.2007.0030en
dcterms.referencesDrury, H. (2018). Knowledge building. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 41(2), 157– 184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/aral.00008.druen
dcterms.referencesDunham, N. (2012). A date with Academic Literacies: Using brief conversation to facilitate student engagement with Academic Literacies. US-China Education Review, 7, 682–688.en
dcterms.referencesDweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040–1048. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040en
dcterms.referencesEllis, G. (1996). How culturally appropriate is the communicative approach? ELT Journal, 50(3), 213–218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/50.3.213en
dcterms.referencesEricsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363en
dcterms.referencesEscorcia, D. (2015). Teaching and assessing writing skills at university level: A comparison of practices in French and Colombian universities. Educational Research, 57(3), 254–271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2015.1056641en
dcterms.referencesEspitia, M., & Bradshaw, C. (2015). Spanish/English primary integrated curriculum: Language and literacy. Madrid, Spain: Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte, Centro Nacional de Innovación e Investigaciónen
dcterms.referencesFajardo, A., & Miranda, I. (2018). In-service language teachers’ perceptions on the National Bilingualism Program implementation: A case study. Cuadernos de Lingüística Hispánica, (32), 193.en
dcterms.referencesFang, X., & Xue-mei, J. (2007). Error analysis and the EFL classroom teaching. US-China Education Review, 4(9), 10–14.en
dcterms.referencesFareed, M., Ashraf, A., & Bilal, M. (2016). ESL learners’ writing skills: Problems, factors and suggestions. Journal of Education & Social Sciences, 4(2), 83–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.20547/jess0421604201en
dcterms.referencesFeng, L., & Sass, T. R. (2017). Teacher quality and teacher mobility. Education Finance and Policy, 12(3), 396–418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00214en
dcterms.referencesFerenz, O. (2005). EFL writers’ social networks: Impact on advanced academic literacy development. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(4), 339–351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.07.002en
dcterms.referencesFertig, M. (2007). International school accreditation: Between a rock and a hard place? Journal of Research in International Education, 6(3), 333–348en
dcterms.referencesFertig, M. (2007). International school accreditation: Between a rock and a hard place? Journal of Research in International Education, 6(3), 333–348en
dcterms.referencesFlower, L., & Hayes, J. (1981a). Response to Linda Flower and John R. Hayes, “A cognitive process theory of writing.” College Composition and Communication, 34(2), 217.en
dcterms.referencesFlower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981b). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365en
dcterms.referencesFlowerdew, J., & Wang, S. H. (2015). Identity in academic discourse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 81–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S026719051400021Xen
dcterms.referencesFoerch, D. F., & Iuspa, F. (2016). The internationalization of the Reggio Emilia philosophy. Revista Contrapontos, 16(2), 321. http://dx.doi.org/10.14210/contrapontos.v16n2.p321-350en
dcterms.referencesFortune, A. (2005). Learners’ use of metalanguage in collaborative form-focused L2 output tasks. Language Awareness, 14(1), 21–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09658410508668818en
dcterms.referencesFriedman, D. A. (2012). How to collect and analyze qualitative data. In Research Methods in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 180–200). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444347340.ch10en
dcterms.referencesGarzon, E. (2016). Early reflections upon the Colombian National Program of Bilingualism in Boyacá. Enletawa Journal, (2), 109–118.en
dcterms.referencesGathercole, S. E., Pickering, S. J., Knight, C., & Stegmann, Z. (2004). Working memory skills and educational attainment: Evidence from national curriculum assessments at 7 and 14 years of age. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(1), 1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.934en
dcterms.referencesGee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London, UK: Taylor & Francisen
dcterms.referencesGholami, H. (2016). Self assessment and learner autonomy. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(1), 46. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0601.06en
dcterms.referencesGiven, L. (2008). Open coding. In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909.n299en
dcterms.referencesGokalp, M. (2013). The effect of students’ learning styles to their academic success. Creative Education, 04(10), 627–632. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.410090en
dcterms.referencesGómez, J. (2011). Teaching EFL academic writing in Colombia: Reflections in contrastive rhetoric. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 13(1), 205–213en
dcterms.referencesGónzalez, A. (2007). Profesional development of EFL teachers in Colombia: Between colonial and local practices. Íkala, Revista De Lenguaje Y Cultura, 12(August 2007), 309–332.en
dcterms.referencesGoulão, M. de F., & Menedez, R. C. (2015). Learner autonomy and self-regulation in eLearning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174(1), 1900–1907. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.853en
dcterms.referencesGoulão, M. de F., & Menedez, R. C. (2015). Learner autonomy and self-regulation in eLearning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174(1), 1900–1907. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.853 future directions. In Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3–21). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.en
dcterms.referencesGreene, J., & McClintock, C. (1985). Triangulation in evaluation. Evaluation Review, 9(5), 523– 545. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0193841X8500900501en
dcterms.referencesHallberg, L. R. M. (2006). The “core category” of grounded theory: Making constant comparisons. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 1(3), 141–148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17482620600858399en
dcterms.referencesHarklau, L. (2001). From high school to college: Student perspectives on literacy practices. Journal of Literacy Research, 33(1), 33–70.en
dcterms.referencesHarmer, J. (2007). The practice of English Language teaching (4th ed.). Harlow, England: Longman. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx060en
dcterms.referencesHayes, J. R. (2011). Kinds of knowledge-telling: Modeling early writing development. Journal of Writing Research, 3(2), 73–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2011.03.02.1en
dcterms.referencesHerder, A., Berenst, J., de Glopper, K., & Koole, T. (2018). Reflective practices in collaborative writing of primary school students. International Journal of Educational Research, 90, 160–174.en
dcterms.referencesHeyworth, F. (2006). The common European framework. ELT Journal, 60(2), 181–183.en
dcterms.referencesHiggs, T. (1983). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 67(2), 168–169en
dcterms.referencesHyland, K. (1990). A genre description of the argumentative essay. RELC Journal, 21(1), 66–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003368829002100105en
dcterms.referencesHyland, K. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156–177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156en
dcterms.referencesHyland, K. (2013). Writing in the university: Education, knowledge and reputation. Language Teaching, 46(1), 53–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000036en
dcterms.referencesHymes, D., & Johnstone, B. (1997). Ethnography, linguistics, narrative, inequality: Toward an understanding of voice. Language, 73(3), 649.en
dcterms.referencesIbarrola, A. L. (2013). Reformulation and self-correction: Insights into correction strategies for EFL writing in a school context. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 29–49.en
dcterms.referencesIntarapanich, C. (2013). Teaching methods, approaches and strategies found in EFL classrooms: A case study in Lao PDR. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 88, 306–311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.510en
dcterms.referencesIrvin, L. L. (2010). What is “Academic Writing”? In C. Lowe & Zemliansky. Pavel (Eds.), Writing Spaces: Readings on Writing (Vol. 1, pp. 2–17).en
dcterms.referencesIrvin, L. L. (2010). What is “Academic Writing”? In C. Lowe & Zemliansky. Pavel (Eds.), Writing Spaces: Readings on Writing (Vol. 1, pp. 2–17).en
dcterms.referencesIvanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity (Vol. 5). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/swll.5en
dcterms.referencesJacobson, L. A., Williford, A. P., & Pianta, R. C. (2011). The role of executive function in children’s competent adjustment to middle school. Child Neuropsychology, 17(3), 255–280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2010.535654en
dcterms.referencesJewitt, C. (2005). Multimodality, “reading” and “writing” for the 21st century. Discourse. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01596300500200011en
dcterms.referencesJiang, Y., Olson, I. R., & Chun, M. M. (2000). Organization of visual short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(3), 683–702. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.3.683en
dcterms.referencesJohn-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31(3–4), 191–206.en
dcterms.referencesKachru, B. B., Kachru, Y., & Nelson, C. L. (2008). The handbook of world Englishes. New Yersey: Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470757598en
dcterms.referencesKaiser, D. (2017). English language teaching in Uruguay. World Englishes, 36(4), 744–759.en
dcterms.referencesKatz, I., Assor, A., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Bereby-Meyer, Y. (2006). Interest as a motivational resource: Feedback and gender matter, but interest makes the difference. Social Psychology of Education, 9(1), 27–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11218-005-2863-7en
dcterms.referencesKendall, J. (1999). Axial coding and the Grounded Theory controversy. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 21(6), 743–757. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01939459922044162en
dcterms.referencesKiese-Himmel, C. (2020). Working memory - An overview. Sprache · Stimme · Gehör, 44(02), 107–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0899-6784en
dcterms.referencesKim, Y. (2008). Effects of expressive writing among bilinguals: Exploring psychological wellbeing and social behaviour. British Journal of Health Psychology, 13(1), 43–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/135910707X251225en
dcterms.referencesKimberlin, C. L., & Winterstein, A. G. (2008). Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 65(23), 2276– 2284. http://dx.doi.org/10.2146/ajhp070364en
dcterms.referencesKlein, K., & Boals, A. (2001). Expressive writing can increase working memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096- 3445.130.3.520en
dcterms.referencesKrase, E. (2012). Coming to learn: From first-year composition to writing in the disciplines. Across the Disciplines, 9(2), 1–22.en
dcterms.referencesKrugly-Smolska, E. (2002). The scientific voice. Science Education, 86(6), 859–860. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.10061en
dcterms.referencesKulju, P., Kupiainen, R., Wiseman, A. M., Jyrkiäinen, A., Koskinen-Sinisalo, K.-L., & Mäkinen, M. (2018). A review of multiliteracies pedagogy in primary classrooms. Language and Literacy, 20(2), 80–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.20360/langandlit29333en
dcterms.referencesLea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (2006). The “Academic Literacies” model: Theory and applications. Theory Into Practice, 45(4), 368–377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4504_11en
dcterms.referencesLeedham, M. (2010). Academic writing: At the interface of corpus and discourse. System. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.06.008en
dcterms.referencesLeki, I. (2007). Undergraduates in a second language: Challenges and complexities of academic literacy development. New York, NY: Erlbaum.en
dcterms.referencesLillard, A. (2006). The early years: Evaluating Montessori education. Science, 313(5795), 1893– 1894. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1132362en
dcterms.referencesLillard, A. (2006). The early years: Evaluating Montessori education. Science, 313(5795), 1893– 1894. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1132362en
dcterms.referencesLoewen, S., Li, S., Fei, F., Thompson, A., Nakatsukasa, K., Ahn, S., & Chen, X. (2009). Second language learners’ beliefs about grammar instruction and error correction. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 91–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00830.xen
dcterms.referencesLogan, A. (2012). Improving personal voice in academic writing: An action inquiry using selfreflective practice. Reflective Practice, 13(6), 775–788. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2012.732937en
dcterms.referencesMahiroglu, A. (2007). Teachers’ opinions on students’ higher order thinking skills. Online Submissionen
dcterms.referencesMasadeh, M. a. (2012). Focus group: Reviews and practices. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 2(10), 63–68.en
dcterms.referencesMatear, A. (2008). English language learning and education policy in Chile: Can English really open doors for all? Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 28(2), 131–147.en
dcterms.referencesMayberry, R. I. (2007). When timing is everything: Age of first-language acquisition effects on second-language learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(3), 537–549. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0142716407070294en
dcterms.referencesMcAdoo, P. (2014). Expressive writing. In Writing for wellbeing (pp. 33–47). Dublin, Ireland: Blackrocken
dcterms.referencesMcCann, T. M. (1989). Student argumentative writing knowledge and ability at three grade levels. Research in the Teaching of English, 23(1), 62–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/40171288en
dcterms.referencesMcClelland, M. M., Acock, A. C., & Morrison, F. J. (2006). The impact of kindergarten learning-related skills on academic trajectories at the end of elementary school. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21(4), 471–490. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.09.003en
dcterms.referencesMcClelland, M. M., & Cameron, C. E. (2011). Self-regulation and academic achievement in elementary school children. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cd.302en
dcterms.referencesMcComiskey, B. (2000). Writing in context. In U. S. U. Press (Ed.), Teaching composition as a social process (pp. 113–138). Logan, UT: University Press of Colorado.en
dcterms.referencesMcComiskey, B. (2017). Social process: Rhetorical inquiry. In U. P. of Colorado (Ed.), Teaching composition as a social process (pp. 19–46). Logan,UT: Utah State University Press.en
dcterms.referencesMcDougald, J. (2012). The state of language and content instruction in Colombia. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 2(2), 44–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2009.2.2.15en
dcterms.referencesMcKay, S. L. (2016). Sociolinguistics and language education. In Second and Foreign Language Education (pp. 1–12). Cham: Springer International Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02323-6_2-1en
dcterms.referencesMehring, J. (2018). The flipped classroom. In Innovations in Flipping the Language Classroom: Theories and Practices. Springer, Singapore.en
dcterms.referencesMills, A., Durepos, G., & Wiebe, E. (2013a). Anonymity and confidentiality. In Encyclopedia of Case Study Research. SAGE Publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412957397.n9en
dcterms.referencesMills, A., Durepos, G., & Wiebe, E. (2013b). Coding: Axial Coding. In Encyclopedia of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412957397.n54en
dcterms.referencesMiranda, N., & Cárdenas, R. (2014). Implementation of the National Bilingual Program in Colombia: An interim assessment. Educación y Educadores, 17(1106), 51–67.en
dcterms.referencesMontessori, M. (2004). The Montessori method, the origins of an educational innovation (G. Lee, Ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefielden
dcterms.referencesMontessori, M., Hunt, J. M., & Valsiner, J. (2017). The Montessori method (H. Bienen, Ed.)The Montessori Method. Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315133225en
dcterms.referencesMontessori, Mario. (1976). Education for human development: Understanding Montessori (P. Polk, Ed.). New York, NY: Shocken Booksen
dcterms.referencesMoreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309–326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2en
dcterms.referencesMorgan, D. L. (2017). Mixed methods research. In K. O. Korgen (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Sociology (Vol. 1, pp. 153–161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781316418376.015en
dcterms.referencesMorton, J., Storch, N., & Thompson, C. (2015). What our students tell us: Perceptions of three multilingual students on their academic writing in first year. Journal of Second Language Writing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.007en
dcterms.referencesMúnera, I., McNulty, M., & Quinchía, D. (2004). Elementary English language instruction: Colombian teachers’ classroom practices. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 5(1), 37–55en
dcterms.referencesMuñoz, A. P., & Palacio, M. (2012). Teachers’ beliefs about assessment in an EFL context in Colombia. Profile Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 14(1), 143–158.en
dcterms.referencesNamasivayam, P., Singh, C., Mostafa, N., Janoory, L., & Abdullah, M. (2017). Improving ESL students descriptive writing through Wh-question technique. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(7), 219–231. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v7-i7/3091en
dcterms.referencesNardi, P. M. (2018). Developing a questionnaire. In Doing Survey Research (pp. 71–113). Abingdon, UK: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315172231-4en
dcterms.referencesNey, J. W., Gowers, E., Greenbaum, S., & Whitcut, J. (1989). The complete plain words. College Composition and Communication, 40(4), 489. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/358252en
dcterms.referencesNichols, K., Gillies, R., & Hedberg, J. (2016). Argumentation-based collaborative inquiry in science through representational work: Impact on primary students’ representational fluency. Research in Science Education, 46(3), 343–364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11165- 014-9456-4en
dcterms.referencesNijhawan, L., Janodia, M., Muddukrishna, B., Bhat, K., Bairy, K., Udupa, N., & Musmade, P. (2013). Informed consent: Issues and challenges. Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology and Research, 4(3), 134–140. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-4040.116779en
dcterms.referencesNiño, F. L., & Páez, M. E. V. (2018). Building writing skills in English in fifth graders: Analysis of strategies based on literature and creativity. English Language Teaching, 11(9), 102. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n9p102en
dcterms.referencesNoble, H., & Mitchell, G. (2016). What is Grounded Theory? Evidence Based Nursing, 19(2), 34–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/eb-2016-102306en
dcterms.referencesNoble, H., & Smith, J. (2015). Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. Evidence Based Nursing, 18(2), 34–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/eb-2015-102054en
dcterms.referencesNofrion, N., & Wijayanto, B. (2018). Learning activities in higher order thinking skills (HOTS) oriented learning context. Geosfera Indonesia, 3(2), 122. http://dx.doi.org/10.19184/geosi.v3i2.8126en
dcterms.referencesNorris, N. (1997). Error, bias and validity in qualitative research. Educational Action Research, 5(1), 172–176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09650799700200020en
dcterms.referencesNunan, D. (1995). Closing the gap between learning and instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 133. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3587808en
dcterms.referencesOnwuegbuzie, A. J., & Combs, J. P. (2015). Emergent data analysis techniques in mixed methods research: A synthesis. In SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research (pp. 397–430). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193.n17en
dcterms.referencesOroujlou, N., & Vahedi, M. (2011). Motivation, attitude, and language learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 994–1000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.333en
dcterms.referencesPajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307en
dcterms.referencesParis, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3602_4en
dcterms.referencesParker, D. (2013). Writing for academic success. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(4), 692–694. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.700438en
dcterms.referencesPfeiffer, V., & Van der Walt, C. (2018). Improving academic writing through expressive writing. Journal for Language Teaching, 50(2), 57.en
dcterms.referencesPiaget, J. (1964). Part I: Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2, 176–186.en
dcterms.referencesPiazza, C. L., & Siebert, C. F. (2008). Development and validation of a writing dispositions scale for elementary and middle school students. The Journal of Educational Research, 101(5), 275–286. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOER.101.5.275-286en
dcterms.referencesPonce, O. A., & Pagán-Maldonado, N. (2015). Mixed methods research in education: Capturing the complexity of the profession. International Journal of Educational Excellence, 1(1), 111–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.18562/ijee.2015.0005en
dcterms.referencesRabiee, F. (2004). Focus-group interview and data analysis. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 63(4), 655–660. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/PNS2004399en
dcterms.referencesRamírez-Romero, J. L., & Sayer, P. (2016). Introduction to the special issue on English language teaching in public primary schools in Latin America. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24, 79.en
dcterms.referencesRao, Z. (2007). Training in brainstorming and developing writing skills. ELT Journal, 61(2), 100–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm002en
dcterms.referencesReja, U., Manfreda, K. L., Hlebec, V., & Vehovar, V. (2003). Open-ended vs. close-ended questions in web questionnaires. Developments in Applied Statistics, 1(19), 159–177.en
dcterms.referencesReznitskaya, A., Anderson, R., McNurlen, B., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Archodidou, A., & Kim, S. (2001). Influence of oral discussion on written argument. Discourse Processes, 32(2–3), 155–175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2001.9651596en
dcterms.referencesRivera Barreto, A. (2011). Improving writing through stages. HOW, 18(1), 11–23.en
dcterms.referencesRobinson, P. (1995). Attention, memory, and the “Noticing” hypothesis. Language Learning, 45(2), 283–331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00441.xen
dcterms.referencesRogers, H. (2004). Writing systems: A linguistic approach. International Journal of American Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Oxford: Blackwell.en
dcterms.referencesRojas-Drummond, S., Maine, F., Alarcón, M., Trigo, A. L., Barrera, M. J., Mazón, N., … Hofmann, R. (2017). Dialogic literacy: Talking, reading and writing among primary school children. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 12, 45–62.en
dcterms.referencesRuegg, R. (2018). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on changes in EFL students’ writing self-efficacy. The Language Learning Journal, 46(2), 87–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.958190en
dcterms.referencesRuel, E., Wagner, W. E., & Gillespie, B. J. (2016). Pretesting and pilot testing. In The Practice of Survey Research: Theory and Applications (pp. 101–119). 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320: SAGE Publications, Inc. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483391700.n6en
dcterms.referencesSalmona, M. (2014). The use of first language in the second-language classroom: A support for second language acquisition. GiST Education and Learning Research Journal, 9(9 JULDEC), 50–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.26817/16925777.143en
dcterms.referencesSánchez Solarte, A., & Obando Guerrero, G. (2008). Is Colombia ready for “Bilingualism”? Profile Issues in Teachers` Professional Development, 9, 181–196.en
dcterms.referencesSandelowski, M. (2000). Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed‐method studies. Research in Nursing & Health, 23(3), 246– 255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200006)23:3<246::AID-NUR9>3.3.CO;2-8en
dcterms.referencesSandoval, W. A., & Millwood, K. A. (2005). The quality of students’ use of evidence in written scientific explanations. Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), 23–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2301_2en
dcterms.referencesScardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 37–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0101_3en
dcterms.referencesSchutz, P. A. (2014). Inquiry on teachers’ emotion. Educational Psychologist, 49(1), 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.864955en
dcterms.referencesScott, C., & Medaugh, M. (2017). Axial coding. In The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods (pp. 1–2). Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0012en
dcterms.referencesŞenel, E. (2018). The integration of creative writing into academic writing skills in EFL classes. International Journal of Languages’ Education, 6(2), 115–120en
dcterms.referencesSerpell, Z. N., & Esposito, A. G. (2016). Development of executive functions: Implications for educational policy and practice. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(2), 203–210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2372732216654718en
dcterms.referencesShahabadi, M. M., & Uplane, M. (2015). Synchronous and asynchronous e-learning styles and academic performance of e-learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 129– 138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.453en
dcterms.referencesShashok, K. (2008). Content and communication: How can peer review provide helpful feedback about the writing? BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-3en
dcterms.referencesSills Alden, K. (2018). Creative writing innovations and old and new, tried and untried. Journal of Creative Writing Studies, 3(1), 6. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.rit.edu/jcws/vol3/iss1/4en
dcterms.referencesSilyn-Roberts, H. (2000). Problems of style. In Writing for Science and Engineering (pp. 209– 234). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-075064636-9/50018-5en
dcterms.referencesSime, D. R. (1987). The nature of learning. Journal of Management Education, 11(2), 105–110en
dcterms.referencesSinger, R. N., & Chen, D. (1994). A classification scheme for cognitive strategies: Implications for learning and teaching psychomotor skills. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 65(2), 143–151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1994.10607609en
dcterms.referencesSnow, C. E., & Uccelli, P. (2010). The challenge of academic language. In The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 112–133). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511609664.008en
dcterms.referencesSnowden, A., & Martin, C. R. (2011). Concurrent analysis: Towards generalisable qualitative research. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20(19–20), 2868–2877. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03513.xen
dcterms.referencesSpiro, J. (2013). Changing methodologies in TESOL (J. Cutting & F. Farr, Eds.)Language Value. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.en
dcterms.referencesSpiro, J. (2019). Methods and principles for integrating the four skills: Reading, writing, speaking and listening. In J. Cutting & F. E. Farr (Eds.), Changing Methodologies in TESOL (pp. 145–168). Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Pressen
dcterms.referencesSt. Pierre, E. A., & Jackson, A. Y. (2014). Qualitative data analysis after coding. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 715–719. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077800414532435en
dcterms.referencesStamenkovski, S., & Zajkov, O. (2012). Where are the students on the path between Bloom’s taxonomy and the critical thinking. Macedonian Physics Teacher, 48, 36–42en
dcterms.referencesStreet. (1999). The meanings of literacy. In D. A. Wagner, R. L. Venezky, & B. V. Street (Eds.), Literacy: An international handbook (pp. 34–40). Boulder, CO.: Westview Pressen
dcterms.referencesStreet, Brian. (2013). Academic literacies approaches to genre? Brazilian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 347–361en
dcterms.referencesStreet, Brian. (2015a). Academic writing: Theory and practice. Journal of Educational Issues, 1(2), 110–116en
dcterms.referencesStreet, Brian V. (2015b). Academic writing: Theory and practice. Journal of Educational Issues, 1(2), 110. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/jei.v1i2.8314en
dcterms.referencesSwandi, I. S. B., & Netto-Shek, J.-A. (2007). Teaching writing at the primary levels. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 1–10en
dcterms.referencesTaatgen, N. A. (2013). The nature and transfer of cognitive skills. Psychological Review, 120(3), http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0033138en
dcterms.referencesTallal, P. (2004). Improving language and literacy is a matter of time. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(1), 721–728. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn1499en
dcterms.referencesTeddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1558689806292430en
dcterms.referencesThamrin, N. R., Widodo, P., & Margana. (2019). Developing Higher Order Thinking Skills (Hots) for reading comprehension enhancement. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1179(1), 012073. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1179/1/012073en
dcterms.referencesTogatorop, E. (2015). Teaching writing with a web-based collaborative learning. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 1(5), 247–256.en
dcterms.referencesTolich, M. (2010). Researching with integrity: The ethics of academic inquiry. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 33(3), 317–318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1743727x.2010.512098en
dcterms.referencesTracy, E., Anderson, R., Snow, E. H., & Selman, R. L. (2012). Academic discussions: An analysis of instructional discourse and an argument for an integrative assessment framework. American Educational Research Journal, 49(6), 1214–1250. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0002831212456066en
dcterms.referencesTruscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(4), 255–272.en
dcterms.referencesTsybulsky, D., & Oz, A. (2019). From frustration to insights: Experiences, attitudes, and pedagogical practices of preservice science teachers implementing PBL in elementary school. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(3), 259–279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1559560en
dcterms.referencesUnseth, P. (2005). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis (review). Linguistic Society of America, 81(2), 518.en
dcterms.referencesUsma, J. A. (2009). Education and language policy in Colombia: Exploring processes of inclusion, exclusion, and stratification in times of global reform. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development, 11(1), 123–141en
dcterms.referencesvan Teijlingen, E., & Hundley, V. (2002). The importance of pilot studies. Nursing Standard, 16(40), 33–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/ns2002.06.16.40.33.c3214en
dcterms.referencesVygotsky, L. S. (1980). Interaction between learning and development. In Mind in Society (pp. 79–91). Harvard University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4.11en
dcterms.referencesVygotsky, L. S. (2011). Vygotsky’s Social Development Theory. In Encyclopedia of Child Behavior and Development (p. 1550). Boston, MA: Springer US. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79061-9_6337en
dcterms.referencesWalsh, K. (2005). Blended learning. BMJ, 330(7495), 829. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.330.7495.829en
dcterms.referencesWalton, D. N. (1990). What is reasoning? What is an argument? The Journal of Philosophy, 87(8), 399. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2026735en
dcterms.referencesWhitaker, A. (2009). Academic writing guide: A step-by-step guide to writing academic papers. City University of Seattle, 1(9), 0–28en
dcterms.referencesWilliams, D., & Coles, L. (2007). Teachers’ approaches to finding and using research evidence: An information literacy perspective. Educational Research, 49(2), 185–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131880701369719en
dcterms.referencesWilliams, J. D. (2005). Preparing to teach writing: Research, theory, and practice (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: LEAen
dcterms.referencesWingate, U. (2012). Using Academic Literacies and genre-based models for academic writing instruction: A ‘literacy’ journey. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(1), 26–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.JEAP.2011.11.006en
dcterms.referencesWong, B. (2010). Color coding. Nature Methods, 7(8), 573–573. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth0810-573en
dcterms.referencesWoolf, B., Burleson, W., Arroyo, I., Dragon, T., Cooper, D., & Picard, R. (2009). Affect-aware tutors: Recognising and responding to student affect. International Journal of Learning Technology, 4(3/4), 129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJLT.2009.028804en
dcterms.referencesYang, W. (2019). Evaluating contextualized content and language integrated learning materials at the tertiary level. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 11(2), 236–274. http://dx.doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2018.11.2.4en
dcterms.referencesYoung, G. B. (2014). Self-awareness. In Encyclopedia of the Neurological Sciences. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385157-4.00340-7en
dcterms.referencesZhang, D., & Zou, Y. (2020). Fostering multiliteracies through blended EFL learning. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 3(2), 40–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2020.3.2.5en
dcterms.referencesZohar, A., Degani, A., & Vaaknin, E. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs about low-achieving students and higher order thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(4), 469–485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00007-5en
dcterms.referencesZohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2003). Higher order thinking skills and low-achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 145–181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1202_1en
dcterms.referencesZohrabi, M. (2013). Mixed method research: Instruments, validity, reliability and reporting findings. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(2), 254–262. http://dx.doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.2.254-262en
thesis.degree.disciplineFacultad de Educaciónes_CO
thesis.degree.levelMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigido (Virtual)es_CO
thesis.degree.nameMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigidoes_CO


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International