Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.advisorLlanes, Juliana
dc.contributor.authorRomero Melo, Jenny Esperanza
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-25T13:51:01Z
dc.date.available2020-11-25T13:51:01Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-13
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/44995
dc.description117 páginases_CO
dc.description.abstractThe 21st-century communicative, socio-cultural, and political dynamics request language learners to take a critical position towards the flow of multimodal information. This entails analyzing discursive. linguistic and semiotic mechanisms used by multimodal texts (Stein,2001; Mestre-Mestre,2015; Danielsson and Selander,2016). However, there is a gap in educational research on the specific ways in which learners’ subject position themselves (Davies and Harré, 1990) and make discourse choices after analyzing multimodal input. Thus, this qualitative action research study aimed to help learners analyze this input by using symbolic competence (Kramsch, 2015) strategies. The participants of this study were 12 eighth grade students from a private institution in Cota, Colombia, whose ages ranged from 14 to 16. The implementation allowed learners’ multimodal analysis through thinking routines, socializations, and discussions based on the socio-cultural phenomena identified on the text. Data was collected through a focus group, interviews, questionnaires, artifacts, and observation, which were analyzed through grounded-theory principles (Corbin and Strauss, 2015). The findings suggest that symbolic analysis leads learners to recognize the texts’ connotative and ideological implications. The process challenges students to take a position towards master narratives, hegemonic discourses, (McLean and Syed, 2015) their previous discourse positions, and to examine relationships between the subject and the social order.eng
dc.description.abstractLas dinámicas comunicativas, sociales, culturales y políticas del siglo 21 demandan que los estudiantes de lenguas construyan una posición crítica frente al flujo de información multimodal a la que están expuestos. Esto implica analizar los mecanismos lingüísticos, semióticos y discursivos usados por los textos multimodales (Stein, 2001; Mestre-Mestre, 2015; Danielsson and Selander, 2016). Sin embargo, la investigación educativa no se ha ocupado de los modos específicos en los que los estudiantes se posicionan (Davies and Harré, 1990), toman sus decisiones discursivas, luego de analizar input multimodal. Por tanto, esta investigación-acción cualitativa tuvo como finalidad que los estudiantes analizaran este input utilizando estrategias de competencia simbólica (Kramsch, 2015). Los participantes del estudio fueron 12 estudiantes de grado octavo de una institución privada en Cota, Colombia, cuyas edades se encuentran entre 14 y 16 años. La implementación permitió el análisis multimodal de los estudiantes a través de rutinas de pensamiento, socializaciones y discusiones basadas en los fenómenos socioculturales identificados en el texto. La información fue recopilada a partir de grupo focal, entrevista, cuestionarios, artefactos y observación, luego, fue analizada a través de los principios de la teoría fundamentada (Corbin and Strauss, 2015). Los resultados sugieren que el analisis simbólico conduce a que los estudiantes reconozcan las implicaciones ideológicas y connotativas de los textos, además, el proceso reta a los estudiante a tomar una posición frente a las narrativas master (McLean and Syed, 2015) , discursos hegemónicos, sus previas posiciones discursivas y a examinar las relaciones entre el sujeto y el orden social.spa
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.sourcereponame:Intellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.titleExploring English learners’ Subject-Positioning: An Action Research on Multimodal Input Analysis Through Symbolic Competence Strategieses_CO
dc.typemasterThesises_CO
dc.identifier.local279709
dc.identifier.localTE11007
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_CO
dc.subject.armarcPlanificación educativaspa
dc.subject.armarcEducación secundariaspa
dc.subject.armarcEducación basada en competenciasspa
dcterms.referencesÁlvarez, J. (2016). Meaning making and communication in the multimodal age : ideas for language teachers Construcción de significados y comunicación en la era multimodal : ideas para profesores del lenguaje. Colombian Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 98–115.eng
dcterms.referencesAndrews, M. (2002). Counter-narratives and the power to oppose. Narrative Inquiry, 12, 1–6.eng
dcterms.referencesAnstey, M., and Bull, G. (2010). Helping teachers to explore multimodal texts. Curriculum and Leadership Journal, 8(16). http://www.curriculum.edu.au/leader/helping_teachers_to_explore_multimodal_texts,31522 .html? issue ID=12141eng
dcterms.referencesBehrman, E. H. (2006). Teaching about language , power , and text : A review of classroom practices that support critical literacy. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 49(6), 490–498. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.49.6.4eng
dcterms.referencesBelz, J. (2002). The myth of the deficient communicator. Language Teaching Research, 6(1), 59–82.eng
dcterms.referencesBenwell, B., and Stokoe, E. (2006). Theorising Discourse and Identity. In B. Benwell and E. Stokoe (Eds.), Discourse and Identity (1st ed., pp. 17–48). Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780748626533eng
dcterms.referencesBertau, M.-C., and Tures, A. (2019). Becoming professional through dialogical learning: How language activity shapes and (re-) organizes the dialogical self’s voicings and positions. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 20, 14–23.eng
dcterms.referencesBhabha, H. K. (1994). The Location in Culture. Routledge.eng
dcterms.referencesButler, J. (1997). Excitable Speech a Politics of the Performative (A. Haverkamp (ed.)). Routledge.eng
dcterms.referencesBourdieu, P. (1979). Symbolic power. Critique of Anthropology, 4, 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X7900401307eng
dcterms.referencesBourdieu, P, and Passeron, J. . (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture (2nd ed.). SAGEeng
dcterms.referencesByram, M. (2000). Assessing intercultural competence in language teaching. Sprogforum, 18(6), 8–13.eng
dcterms.referencesCloonan, A. (2015). Integrating by design: multimodality, 21st century skills and subject area knowledge. In B. Cope and M. Kalantzis (Eds.), A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies (pp.97-114). Palgrave Macmillan.eng
dcterms.referencesCohen, L., Manion, L., and Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education. Routledge.eng
dcterms.referencesCorbin, J., and Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of Qualitative Research (4th ed.). SAGE.eng
dcterms.referencesCummins, J. (2000). Negotiating Intercultural Identities in the Multilingual Classroom. The CATESOL Journal, 12(1), 163–178eng
dcterms.referencesDanielsson, K., and Selander, S (2016). Reading Multimodal Texts for Learning – a Model for Cultivating Multimodal Literacy. Designs for Learning, 8(1), 25–36, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.16993/dfl.72eng
dcterms.referencesDavies, B., and Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: the discoursive production of selves. Journal of the Theory of Social Behavior, 20, 43–65.eng
dcterms.referencesDennis, J., Höllerer, M., and Meyer, R. (2016). Critical analysis of visual and multimodal texts. In M. Steele (Ed.), Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (pp. 180–204). SAGEeng
dcterms.referencesDerrida, J. (1988). Limited Inc a b c. In S. Weber (Ed.), Limited Inc. (pp. 1–25). Northwestern University Presseng
dcterms.referencesFeinstein, S. (2009). Secrets of the Teenage Brain: Research-Based Strategies for Reaching and Teaching Today’s Adolescents (C. Chambers, B. Ory, A. Schroller, and C. Long (eds.); 2nd ed.). SAGE.eng
dcterms.referencesFlick, U., Kardoff, von E., and Steinke, I. (2004). A companion to qualitative research. SAGE.eng
dcterms.referencesFoucault, M. (2002). Discourse Formations. In The Archaeology of Knowledge (pp. 20–86). Routledgeeng
dcterms.referencesGarcía-Pastor, M. D. (2017). Learners’ identities at stake : Digital identity texts in the EFL classroom. Language Value, 9(1), 36–61.eng
dcterms.referencesGassenbauer, C. (2012). Beyond “black” and “white” – Literature as a tool for intercultural learning in the EFLclassroom. U of Vienna, Austria.eng
dcterms.referencesGodhe, A.-L., and Magnusson, P. (2017). Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Computers in Education. New Zealand: Asia-Pacific Society for computers in education. In W. et al Chen (Ed.), Multimodality in language education-exploring the boundaries of digital texts (pp. 845–854).eng
dcterms.referencesGoharimehr, N. (2019). Imagined Identities and Communities in an EFL Context. International Journal of Language, Literature and Culture, 5(3), 35–40.eng
dcterms.referencesGómez, L. F., and Collazos, M. (2016). The construction of English Learners’ identity from a social Perspective and the effects on their language learning lnvestment *. Hallazgos, 28, 105–122.eng
dcterms.referencesHabermas, T., and Bluck, S. (2000). Getting a life: The development of the life story in adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 748–769.eng
dcterms.referencesHult, F. M. (2014). Covert bilingualism and symbolic competence: Analytical reflections on negotiating Insider/Outsider positionality in Swedish speech situations. Applied Linguistics, 35(1), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt003eng
dcterms.referencesKaiser, M. (2018). Teaching a film clip in a multiliteracies framework. L2 Journal, 10(3), 47–57.eng
dcterms.referencesKearney, E. (2012). Perspective-taking and meaning-making through engagement with cultural narratives: bringing history to life in a foreign language classroom. L2 Journal, 4(1), 58–82.eng
dcterms.referencesKelso, J. M. (2018). Boundaries and hybrid blends : How one multilingual narrator displays symbolic competence in a college writing class. Linguistics and Education, 45, 50–61eng
dcterms.referencesKramsch, C. (1996). The cultural component of language teaching. Language Culture and Curriculum Culture and Curriculum, 2, 83–92.eng
dcterms.referencesKramsch, C. (2011). The symbolic dimensions of the intercultural. Language Teaching, 44(3), 354–367. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000431eng
dcterms.referencesKramsch, C. (2015). What is symbolic competence and what can we do with it ?eng
dcterms.referencesKress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. Routledge.eng
dcterms.referencesKumaravadivelu, B. (2008). Understanding language teaching from method to postmethod. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.eng
dcterms.referencesLaFrance, M., and Vial, A. C. (2016). Gender and nonverbal behavior. In D. Matsumoto, H. . Hwang, and M. G. Frank (Eds.), APA handbook of nonverbal communication. (Issue August 2017, pp. 139–161). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14669-006eng
dcterms.referencesMackay, R. R. (2013). Multimodal legitimization: looking and listening to Obama’s ads. In U. Okulska and P. Cap (Eds.), Analyzing genres in political communication: theory and practice (pp. 345–379). John Benjamins.eng
dcterms.referencesMack,N.,Woodsong,C.,MacQueen,K.M.,Guest,G.,&Namey,E.(2005).Qualitative research methods: A data collector’s field guide. Research Triangle Park, NC: Family Health International. Retrieved from http://www.fhi.org/en/rh/pubs/booksreports/qrm_datacoll.htmeng
dcterms.referencesMarshall, S. (2009). Re-becoming ESL : multilingual university students and a deficit identity. Language and Education, 24(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780903194044eng
dcterms.referencesMckinney, C., and Norton, B. (2004). Identity in language and literacy education. In B. Spolsky and F. M. Hult (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Linguistics (1st ed., pp. 192–205). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.eng
dcterms.referencesMcLean, K. C., and Syed, M. (2015). Personal, master, and alternative narratives: An integrative framework for understanding identity development in context. Human Development, 58, 318–349.eng
dcterms.referencesMertens, D. . (2005). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: integrating diversity with quantitive, qualitative and mixed methods. SAGEeng
dcterms.referencesMickan, Peter. (2017). Text based research and teaching from a social semiotic perspective: transformative research and pedagogy. In P Mickan and E. López (Eds.), Text-based research and teaching: A social semiotic perspective on language (pp.15-35). Palgrave Macmillan.eng
dcterms.referencesNorthcutt, N., and McCoy, D. (2004). Interactive qualitative analysis: a systems method for qualitative research. SAGE.Norton, B. (1997). Language, Identity and the Ownership of English. Tesol Quartelry, 31(3), 409–429.eng
dcterms.referencesNorton, B., and Toohey, K. (2011). Identity, language learning, and social change. Language Teaching, 44(4), 412–446. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000309eng
dcterms.referencesÖzbakis, Ö. (2015). The dynamic nature of positional identities in an EFL classroom: a conversation analysis-led case study. The Graduate School of Social Science, Amsterdam, Netherlands.eng
dcterms.referencesPegrum, M. (2008). Film , Culture and Identity : Critical Intercultural Literacies for the Language Classroom Film , Culture and Identity : Critical Language Classroom. Language and Intercultural Communication, 8(2), 136–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708470802271073eng
dcterms.referencesRichardson, D. (2017). Beyond a tolerance of ambiguity: symbolic competence as creative uncertainty and doubt. L2 Journal, 9(2), 12–34eng
dcterms.referencesRitchhart, R. (2015). Creating Cultures of Thinking: The 8 Forces We Must Master to Truly transform our schools. Jossey Bass.eng
dcterms.referencesSánchez, L. S., López, W. L., and Barreto, I. (2013). Enmarcamiento cognitivo de la cultura política. un análisis desde las redes sociales en internet (twitter). Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 47(3), 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.167684spa
dcterms.referencesSerafini, F. (2020). From Theories to Practices Multimodal Literacy : The visual images. Language Arts, 92(6), 412–423eng
dcterms.referencesSim, J., and Wright, C. (2000). Research in Health Care: Concepts, Designs and Methods. Stanley Thornes Ltdeng
dcterms.referencesStein, P. (2001). Classrooms as sites of textual, cultural, and linguistic reappropriation. In B. Comber and A. Simpson (Eds.), Negotiating Critical Literacies in Classrooms (pp. 151– 169). Lawrence Erlbaumeng
dcterms.referencesvan Lier, L. (2004). The semiotics and ecology of language learning. Utbildning and Demokrati, 13(3), 79–103. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004eng
dcterms.referencesVinall, K. (2012). ¿ Un legado histórico ? : symbolic competence and the construction of multiple histories. L2 Journal, 4(1), 102–123.eng
dcterms.referencesVinall, K. (2016). “ Got Llorona ?” teaching for the development of symbolic competence. L2 Journal, 8(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5070/L28128156eng
dcterms.referencesWestwood, P. (2008). What Teachers Need to Know about Reading and Writing Difficulties (C. Glascodine (ed.)). ACER Press.eng
dcterms.referencesWhitworth, K. F. (2006). Access to language learning during studying abroad: the roles of identity and subject-positioning. The Pennsylvania State Universityeng
dcterms.referencesYoudell, D. (2005). Sex-gender-sexuality: How sex, gender and sexuality constellations are constituted in secondary schools. Gender and Education, 17(3), 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250500145148eng
dcterms.referencesZhichang, X. (2017). Developing Meta-cultural Competence in Teaching English as an International Language. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), Advances in Cultural Linguistics (pp. 703– 721). Springereng
thesis.degree.disciplineDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjerases_CO
thesis.degree.levelMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomoes_CO
thesis.degree.nameMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomoes_CO


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International