Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.advisorGoméz, Diana Patricia
dc.contributor.authorTorres Rubio, Gehovel
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-30T13:42:19Z
dc.date.available2020-10-30T13:42:19Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-07
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/43896
dc.description132 páginases_CO
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this research project is to investigate the effects of peer-assessment of graphic organizers in improving reading comprehension in young learners. This research followed a mixed method action research where twenty private school students participated. Likes- dislikes questionnaire and a reading comprehension test were used to collect the data. For data analysis, tally sheets and statistics charts were used. The analysis revealed that students had difficulties in understanding the main idea and drawing conclusions. After data was collected, five instruments were implemented such as a survey, pre and post reading tests, field notes, a peer-assessment checklist and, graphic organizers. The results revealed that graphic organizers were beneficial to acquire learning by organizing ideas and by outlining the information needed in a short story. The second aspect found refers to students feeling engaged by assessing their peers on a task, more specifically by assessing a graphic organizer of story elements. After the implementation stage, it was possible to conclude that peer-assessment of graphic organizers are effective to improve reading comprehension in young learners. Further research is recommended to implement a variety of graphic organizers according to the text (fiction and non-fiction). Moreover, further studies should be done on the effectiveness of peer-assessment of graphic organizers using computer-based tools.eng
dc.description.abstractEl propósito de este proyecto es investigar los efectos de la coevaluación de organizadores gráficos para mejorar la comprensión lectora en los estudiantes jóvenes. Esta investigación se enmarca en investigación acción de método mixto donde participaron veinte estudiantes de escuelas privadas. Se utilizó un cuestionario de preferencias y prueba de comprensión de lectura para recopilar los datos. Para el análisis de datos se utilizaron hojas de cálculo y cuadros estadísticos. El análisis reveló que los estudiantes tenían dificultades para comprender la idea principal y sacar conclusiones. Después de que se recopilaron los datos, se implementaron cinco instrumentos, tales como una encuesta, una prueba previa y posterior a la lectura, notas de campo, una lista de verificación para la coevaluación y organizadores gráficos. Los resultados revelaron que los organizadores gráficos están siendo beneficiosos para adquirir aprendizaje mediante la organización de ideas y delineando la información necesaria en una historia corta. El segundo aspecto identificado se refiere a que los estudiantes se sientan comprometidos con su propio proceso al evaluar a sus compañeros en una tarea, más específicamente al evaluar un organizador gráfico de elementos de la historia. Después de la etapa de implementación, fue posible concluir que la evaluación por pares de los organizadores gráficos es efectiva para mejorar la comprensión lectora en los estudiantes jóvenes. Se recomienda realizar más investigaciones para implementar una variedad de organizadores gráficos de acuerdo con el texto (ficción y no ficción). Además, se deben realizar más estudios sobre la efectividad de la coevaluación de organizadores gráficos utilizando herramientas informáticas.spa
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isospaes_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.sourcereponame:Intellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.titleImproving reading comprehension in young learners through peer-assessment of Graphic organizerses_CO
dc.typemasterThesises_CO
dc.identifier.local279501
dc.identifier.localTE10964
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_CO
dc.subject.armarcComprensión de lecturaspa
dc.subject.armarcModelos de enseñanzaspa
dc.subject.armarcEducación -- Investigacionesspa
dcterms.referencesAli Derakhshan, & Elham Karimi. (2015). The Interference of First Language and Second Language Acquisition. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(10), 2112–2117. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0510.19eng
dcterms.referencesAltemeier, L., Jones, J., Abbott, R. D., & Berninger, V. W. (2006). Executive functions in becoming writing readers and reading writers: Note taking and report writing in third and fifth graders. Developmental Neuropsychology. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2901_8eng
dcterms.referencesAmaya Perez, V. C. (2013). Developing students’ reading comprehension skills through active reading strategies in agronomy articles, 1–108. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10818/9296eng
dcterms.referencesAnderson, C. E., McDougald, J. S., & Cuesta Medina, L. (2015). CLIL for young learners. In C. N. Giannikas, L. McLaughlin, G. Fanning, & N. D. Muller (Eds.), Children learning English: From research to practice (pp. 137–151). Reading, UK: Garnet. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/16843409/CLIL_for_young_learnerseng
dcterms.referencesAndrade, H. G. (2005). Teaching With Rubrics: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. College Teaching. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.53.1.27-31eng
dcterms.referencesAusubel, D. G. (1963). Cognitive Structure and the Facilitation of Meaningful Verbal Learning. Journal of Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248716301400220eng
dcterms.referencesAyverdi, L., Nakiboğlu, C., & Aydin, S. Ö. Z. (2014). Usage of Graphic Organizers in Science and Tecnology Lessons. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.929eng
dcterms.referencesBaker, L. (2006). Observation: A Complex Research Method. Library Trends. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00320564eng
dcterms.referencesBaxendell, B. W. (2003). Consistent, Coherent, Creative: The 3 C’s of Graphic Organizers. TEACHING Exceptional Children. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990303500307eng
dcterms.referencesBenè, K. L., & Bergus, G. (2014). When learners become teachers: A review of peer teaching in medical student education. Family Medicine.eng
dcterms.referencesBernhardt, T. M. (2010). Using graphic organizers to enhance reading comprehension. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.eng
dcterms.referencesBooker, K. (2012). Using Picturebooks to Empower and Inspire Readers and Writers in the Upper Primary Classroom. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 20, i–xiv.eng
dcterms.referencesBorg, S. (2001). The research journal: A tool for promoting and understanding researcher development. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880100500204eng
dcterms.referencesBostock, S. (2000). Student peer assessment. Learning Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2012.727034eng
dcterms.referencesBoud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (1999). Peer Learning and Assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293990240405eng
dcterms.referencesBraselton, S., & Decker, B. C. (1994). Using graphic organizers to improve the reading of mathematics. Reading Teacher. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020- 7292%2809%2960481-1eng
dcterms.referencesBrindley, C., & Scoffield, S. (1998). Peer Assessment in Undergraduate Programmes. Teaching in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356215980030106eng
dcterms.referencesBrown, H. D. (2006). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Language (Vol. 57). https://doi.org/10.2307/414380eng
dcterms.referencesBruce Arne, S. (1984). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. System. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251x(84)90031-9eng
dcterms.referencesBurns, A. (2009). Doing action research in english language teaching: A guide for practitioners. Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching: A Guide for Practitioners. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203863466eng
dcterms.referencesButler, Y. G., & Zeng, W. (2014). Young foreign language learner’s interactions during taskbased paired assessments. Language Assessment Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2013.869814eng
dcterms.referencesCarvalho, A. (2013). Students’ perceptions of fairness in peer assessment: evidence from a problem-based learning course. Teaching in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.753051eng
dcterms.referencesChall, J. (1996). Stages of reading development. Stages of Reading Development, (1998), 9–29. Retrieved from http://www.citeulike.org/group/14233/article/8717868eng
dcterms.referencesCheng, Liying, Q. L. (2006). Analysing Tests of Reading and Listening in Relation to the Common European Framework of Reference : The Experience of The Dutch CEFR Construct Project. Language Assessment Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15434311laq0301eng
dcterms.referencesCheon, J., Chung, S., Song, J., & Kim, Y. (2015). An investigation of the effects of a graphic organizer in an online serious game on learning outcomes and attitudinal perceptions. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.788030eng
dcterms.referencesCook, V. J. (1985). Chomsky’s universal grammar and second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 6(1)(1), 2–18. Retrieved from http://homepage.ntlworld.com/vivian.c/Writings/Papers/AL85.htmeng
dcterms.referencesCorbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2012). Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.): Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.): Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153eng
dcterms.referencesCouncil of Europe. (2001). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. Europe.eng
dcterms.referencesCowan, P. (2010). Teaching for understanding. In Teaching MATHEMATICS. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203416013_chapter_2eng
dcterms.referencesCresswell, J. (2006). Choosing A Mixed Methods Design. In Design in Mind. https://doi.org/1412927927eng
dcterms.referencesCreswell, J. W. (2009). Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches The Selection of a Research Design. Research Design.eng
dcterms.referencesCreswell, & W., J. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research - Chapter 3, Choosing a mixed methods design. SAGE Publications, Inc, 488. https://doi.org/1412927927eng
dcterms.referencesCrozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research. British Journal of Educational Studies. https://doi.org/10.2307/3121684eng
dcterms.referencesCuesta Medina, L., & Alvarez Ayure, C. P. (2014). Fostering collaboration in CALL: Benefits and challenges of using virtual language resource centres. In CALL Design: Principles and Practice - Proceedings of the 2014 EUROCALL Conference, Groningen, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2014.000194eng
dcterms.referencesDalgleish, T., Williams, J. M. G. ., Golden, A.-M. J., Perkins, N., Barrett, L. F., Barnard, P. J., … Watkins, E. (2007). Improving Reading Skills in Beginner Learners by means of Graphic Organizers and the use of English Leveled Readers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(1), 23–42.eng
dcterms.referencesDaniels, H. (2008). Vygotsky and research. Vygotsky and Research. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891797eng
dcterms.referencesde Mejía, A.-M. (2006). Bilingual Education in Colombia: Towards a Recognition of Languages, Cultures and Identities. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal.eng
dcterms.referencesde Mejía, A.-M. (2011). The national bilingual programme in Colombia: Imposition or opportunity? Apples – Journal of Applied Language Studies.eng
dcterms.referencesDellinger, A. B., & Leech, N. L. (2007). Toward a Unified Validation Framework in Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807306147eng
dcterms.referencesDooley, C. M., & Matthews, M. W. (2009). Emergent comprehension: Understanding comprehension development among young literacy learners. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798409345110eng
dcterms.referencesDornyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. (2005).The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition.Xii, 270 Pp.Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.eng
dcterms.referencesDubé, F., Ouellet, C., & Bessette, L. (2016). Explicit teaching of reading fluency and students’ reading comprehension in elementary school. International Journal of Learner Diversity and Identities, 23(2), 31–40. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0- 84969851212&partnerID=40&md5=88c1f5257fd625891ed07288cf61afbceng
dcterms.referencesEastment, D. (2003). Young learners. ELT Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/57.4.421eng
dcterms.referencesEcheverri, L., & McNulty, M. (2010). Reading Strategies to Develop Higher Thinking Skills for Reading Comprehension. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development.eng
dcterms.referencesEducación Nacional, M. de. (2018). Ministerio de Educación Nacional. Manual. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aa6442spa
dcterms.referencesEnnis, R. H. (2011). The Nature of Critical Thinking : An Outline of Critical Thinking Dispositions. In Sixth International Conference on Thinking at MIT.eng
dcterms.referencesEpenscheid, G. E. (1942). The Three Little Pigs Papers, Box M.C. 1.eng
dcterms.referencesErtmer, P. A., Richardson, J. C., Belland, B., Camin, D., Connolly, P., Coulthard, G., … Mong, C. (2007). Using peer feedback to enhance the quality of student online postings: An exploratory study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00331.xeng
dcterms.referencesFriedman, D. A. (2012). How to Collect and Analyze Qualitative Data. In Research Methods in Second Language Acquisition: A Practical Guide. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444347340.ch10eng
dcterms.referencesFurman Shaharabani, Y., & Faiger, H. (2017). TEACHING FOR UNDERSTANDING IN AN ACADEMIC COURSE: EXPERIENCED LECTURER’S CHALLENGES AND BENEFITS. In ICERI2017 Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2017.1294eng
dcterms.referencesGabriele, A., Troseth, E., Martohardjono, G., & Otheguy, R. (2009). Emergent literacy skills in bilingual children: Evidence for the role of L1 syntactic comprehension. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050802331816eng
dcterms.referencesGarcia, J. R., & Cain, K. (2014). Decoding and Reading Comprehension: A Meta-Analysis to Identify Which Reader and Assessment Characteristics Influence the Strength of the Relationship in English. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313499616eng
dcterms.referencesGarzón Alfonso, E. A. (2017). Improving Reading Skills in Beginner Learners by means of Graphic Organizers and the use of English-Leveled Readers, (October).eng
dcterms.referencesGibbons, P. (2003). Scaffolding Language , Scaffolding Learning Teaching Second Language learners in the Mainstream Classroom. Naldic. https://doi.org/802.0-07 Gibeng
dcterms.referencesGonzález, B., & Paola, A. (2011). Fostering Fifth Graders ’ Reading Comprehension through the use of Intensive Reading in Physical Science * La Comprensión de Lectura de Estudiantes de Quinto Grado a través del uso de la Lectura en la Clase de Ciencias, 13, 35–53.eng
dcterms.referencesGottardo, A., & Mueller, J. (2009). Are First- and Second-Language Factors Related in Predicting Second-Language Reading Comprehension? A Study of Spanish-Speaking Children Acquiring English as a Second Language From First to Second Grade. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014320eng
dcterms.referencesGrabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2012). Teaching Reading. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1174eng
dcterms.referencesGranena, G., Muñoz, C., & Tragant, E. (2015). L1 reading factors in extensive L2 reading-whilelistening instruction. System. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.09.005eng
dcterms.referencesGraphic Organizer. (n.d.). Retrieved October 29, 2018, from https://www.edrawsoft.com/templates/pdf/story-elements-graphic-organizer.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesGu, L. (2015). Language ability of young English language learners: Definition, configuration, and implications. Language Testing. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214542670eng
dcterms.referencesGuerrero, K., & Fajardo, M. (2018). Taller de uso de resultados para el mejoramiento continuo del proceso educativospa
dcterms.referencesHall, T., & Strangman, N. (2002). Graphic organizers. In Wakefield MA: National Center on Assessing the General Curriculum. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230528.n26eng
dcterms.referencesHammersley, M. (1993). On the Teacher as Researcher. Educational Action Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965079930010308eng
dcterms.referencesHarrison, C. (1998). What is Reading Comprehension, Why Is It so Hard to Develop, and What Do Teacher Need to Know About it? ESRC Seminar- Reading Comprehension: From Theory to Practice.eng
dcterms.referencesHarrison, C. (2004). Understanding reading development. Understanding Reading Development. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446215401eng
dcterms.referencesHeyworth, F. (2006). The common European framework. ELT Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci105eng
dcterms.referencesHoney, P., & Mumford, A. (1992). The manual of learning styles (3rd editio). Maidenhead.eng
dcterms.referencesHoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401799eng
dcterms.referencesHorton, S. V, Lovitt, T. C., & Bergerud, D. (1990). The effectiveness of graphic organizers for three classifications of secondary students in content area classes. J Learn Disabil. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949002300107eng
dcterms.referencesHughes, A., & Taylor, N. (2010). Teaching English To Young Learners. Seventh International TEYL Research Seminar Paper 2011, 1–67.eng
dcterms.referencesHughes, J. (2007). Reading Process. Retrieved August 24, 2018, from https://faculty.uoit.ca/hughes/Reading/ReadingProcess.htmleng
dcterms.referencesIsemonger, I., & Sheppard, C. (2003). Learning styles. RELC Journal, 34, 195-222. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368820303400205eng
dcterms.referencesJalongo, M. R., & Sobolak, M. J. (2011). Supporting Young Children’s Vocabulary Growth: The Challenges, the Benefits, and Evidence-Based Strategies. Early Childhood Education Journal, 38, 421-429. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-010- 0433-xeng
dcterms.referencesJiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2007). Graphic organizers in reading instruction: Research findings and issues. Reading in a Foreign Language.eng
dcterms.referencesJick, T. D. (1979). Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392366eng
dcterms.referencesJones, I., & Alcock, L. (2014). Peer assessment without assessment criteria. Studies in Higher Education, 39, 1774-1787. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.821974eng
dcterms.referencesJust, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329-354. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.87.4.329eng
dcterms.referencesKamps, D. M., Barbetta, P. M., Leonard, B. R., & Delquadri, J. (1994). Classwide peer tutoring: An integration strategy to improve reading skills and promote peer interactions among students with autism and general education peers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 49-61. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1994.27-49eng
dcterms.referencesKatayama, A. D., & Robinson, D. H. (2000). Getting students “partially” involved in note-taking using graphic organizers. Journal of Experimental Education, 68, 119-133. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970009598498eng
dcterms.referencesKaufman, J. H., & Schunn, C. D. (2011). Students’ perceptions about peer assessment for writing: Their origin and impact on revision work. Instructional Science, 39, 387-406. Advance online publicaton. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9133-6eng
dcterms.referencesKearney, S. P., & Perkins, T. (2014). Engaging students through assessment: The success and limitations of the ASPAL (Authentic Self and Peer Assessment for Learning) Model. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice.eng
dcterms.referencesKhanlou, N., & Peter, E. (2005). Participatory action research: Considerations for ethical review. Social Science & Medicine, 60, 23333-2340. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.10.004eng
dcterms.referencesKibby, M. Y., Lee, S. E., & Dyer, S. M. (2014). Reading performance is predicted by more than phonological processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 960. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00960eng
dcterms.referencesKim, A. H., Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., & Wei, S. (2004). Graphic Organizers and Their Effects on the Reading Comprehension of Students with LD: A Synthesis of Research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 105-118. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194040370020201eng
dcterms.referencesKim, Y. S. (2012). The relations among L1 (Spanish) literacy skills, L2 (English) language, L2 text reading fluency, and L2 reading comprehension for Spanish-speaking ELL first grade students. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 690-700. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.06.009eng
dcterms.referencesKintsch, W., & Rawson, K. a. (2005). Comprehension. The Science of Reading: A Handbook, 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757642.ch12eng
dcterms.referencesKirby, J. R. (2007). Reading comprehension: its nature and development. Encyclopedia of Language and Literacy Development.eng
dcterms.referencesKoda, K. (2007). Reading and language learning: Crosslinguistic constraints on second language reading development. Language Learning, 57, 1-44. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.101997010-i1eng
dcterms.referencesKrashen, S. (2005). Free voluntary reading: New research, applications, and controversies. Anthology Series-Seameo Regional Language Centre, 46(1993), 1. Retrieved from http://sdkrashen.com/articles/singapore/singapore.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesKüçükoğlu, H. (2013). Improving Reading Skills Through Effective Reading Strategies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.113eng
dcterms.referencesLai, C. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2015). An interactive peer-assessment criteria development approach to improving students’ art design performance using handheld devices. Computers & Education, 85, 149-159. advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.011eng
dcterms.referencesLaurillard, D. (2008). The teacher as action researcher: Using technology to capture pedagogic form. Studies in Higher Education, 33, 139-154. advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070801915908eng
dcterms.referencesLeal Filho, W., & Kovaleva, M. (2015). Research methods. In Environmental Science and Engineering (Subseries: Environmental Science). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10906- 0_5eng
dcterms.referencesLeavy, P. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research approaches. The sage Dictionary of social research methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699305050985eng
dcterms.referencesLee, E. S., Yeatman, J. D., Luna, B., & Feldman, H. M. (2011). Specific language and reading skills in school-aged children and adolescents are associated with prematurity after controlling for IQ. Neuropsychologia, 49, 906-913. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.038eng
dcterms.referencesLervåg, A., & Aukrust, V. G. (2010). Vocabulary knowledge is a critical determinant of the difference in reading comprehension growth between first and second language learners. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 51, 612-620. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02185.xeng
dcterms.referencesLingard, L., Albert, M., & Levinson, W. (2008). Grounded theory, mixed methods, and action research. BMJ (clinical research Ed.), 337, a567. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39602.690162.47eng
dcterms.referencesLipka, O., & Siegel, L. S. (2012). The development of reading comprehension skills in children learning English as a second language. Reading and Writing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9309-8eng
dcterms.referencesLittau, K. (2006). Theories of reading: Books, bodies, and bibliomania. Literature & History. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1145/1551609.1551641eng
dcterms.referencesLittle, D. (2006). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Content, purpose, origin, reception and impact. Language Teaching, 39, 167-190. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003557eng
dcterms.referencesLiu, N. F., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11, 279-290. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600680582eng
dcterms.referencesLogan, S., & Johnston, R. (2009). Gender differences in reading ability and attitudes: Examining where these differences lie. Journal of Research in Reading, 32, 199-214. advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.01389.xeng
dcterms.referencesLong, T., Bengio, E., Lowe, R., Chi, J., Cheung, K., & Precup, D. (2017). World Knowledge for Reading Comprehension: Rare Entity Prediction with Hierarchical LSTMs Using External Descriptions. In EMNLP 2017eng
dcterms.referencesLopez, J., & Campoverde, J. (2018). Development of reading comprehension with graphic organizers for students with dyslexia. Journal of Technology and Science Education. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.414eng
dcterms.referencesMahdavi, J. N., & Tensfeldt, L. (2013). Untangling Reading Comprehension Strategy Instruction: Assisting Struggling Readers in the Primary Grades. Preventing School Failure, 57, 77-92. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2012.668576eng
dcterms.referencesManoli, P., & Papadopoulou, M. (2012). Graphic Organizers as a Reading Strategy: Research Findings and Issues. Creative Education, 03, 348-356. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.33055eng
dcterms.referencesMastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., & Graetz, J. E. (2003). Reading Comprehension Instruction for Secondary Students: Challenges for Struggling Students and Teachers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26, 103. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.2307/1593593eng
dcterms.referencesMcDaniel, M. A., Agarwal, P. K., Huelser, B. J., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. (2011). Test-Enhanced Learning in a Middle School Science Classroom: The Effects of Quiz Frequency and Placement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 399-414. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021782eng
dcterms.referencesMcDaniel, M. A., Wildman, K. M., & Anderson, J. L. (2012). Using quizzes to enhance summative-assessment performance in a web-based class: An experimental study. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 18-26. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2011.10.001eng
dcterms.referencesMcDougald, J. S. (2015). AICLE: Un nuevo enfoque para el aprendizaje bilingüe/CLIL: A fresh approach to bilingual learning. Ruta Maestra, 11, 30–38eng
dcterms.referencesMcKay, P. (2006). Assessing Young Language Learners. Assessing Writing. advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733093eng
dcterms.referencesMede, E. (2010). The effects of instruction of graphic organizers in terms of students’ attitudes towards reading in English. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 322-325. Advance online publications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.018eng
dcterms.referencesMedina, A. (2000). Piaget. La Revista Venezolana De Educacion, 3(9), 11–15.spa
dcterms.referencesMegowan-Romanowicz, C. (2010). Inside Out: Action Research from the Teacher-Researcher Perspective. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 993-1011. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-010-9214-zeng
dcterms.referencesMelby-Lervåg, M., & Lervåg, A. (2011). Cross-linguistic transfer of oral language, decoding, phonological awareness and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis of the correlational evidence. Journal of Research in Reading, 34, 114-135. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01477.xeng
dcterms.referencesMEN. (2017). Plan Nacional de Educación 2016 -2026. Plan Nacional de Educación 2016 - 2026spa
dcterms.referencesMerga, M. K. (2014). Exploring the role of parents in supporting recreational book reading beyond primary school. English in Education, 48(2), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/eie.12043eng
dcterms.referencesMertler, C. C. A. (2001). Designing Scoring Rubrics for Your Classroom. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.85.045601eng
dcterms.referencesMichnick, R., Rosinski, R. R., & Golinkoh, R. M. (2012). Decoding , Semantic Processing , and Reading Comprehension Skill. Reading, 47(1), 252–258. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128308eng
dcterms.referencesMikulecky, B. S. (2008). Teaching Reading in a Second Language. Pearson Education., https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139150484eng
dcterms.referencesMintzberg, H. (1970). STRUCTURED OBSERVATION AS A METHOD TO STUDY MANAGERIAL WORK. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 6486.1970.tb00484.xeng
dcterms.referencesMiranda, A. (2013). How Reading Comprehension is Affected by Means of ICT in QuestionAnswer Relationship Strategy in EFL classroom. Tesis, 103. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0124- 00642012000800004eng
dcterms.referencesMoore, C., & Teather, S. (2013). Engaging students in peer review: Feedback as learning. Issues in Educational Research.eng
dcterms.referencesMora, C. (2013). The Influence of Graphic Organizers in A1 Sixth Graders’ Argumentative Writing Skill in an EFL Context. Intellectum, 103. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0124- 00642012000800004eng
dcterms.referencesMori, S. (2002). Redefining motivation to read in a foreign language. Reading in a Foreign Language.eng
dcterms.referencesMorton. (2018). T o p i c. Quantitative Research, 3(Leedy 1993), 1. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v8i1.1023eng
dcterms.referencesMuijselaar, M. M. L., Swart, N. M., Steenbeek-Planting, E. G., Droop, M., Verhoeven, L., & de Jong, P. F. (2017). Developmental Relations Between Reading Comprehension and Reading Strategies. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(3), 194–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1278763eng
dcterms.referencesNaderi, N., & Akrami, A. (2018). EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension Development through MALL: Telegram Groups in Focus. International Journal of Instruction. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11223aeng
dcterms.referencesNakamura, M. (2018). Young Learners. The Language Teacher, 42(1), 29–31.eng
dcterms.referencesNarloch, R., Garbin, C. P., & Turnage, K. D. (2006). Benefits of Prelecture Quizzes. Teaching of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top3302_6eng
dcterms.referencesNewman, M. (2002). Mole and the Baby Bird.eng
dcterms.referencesO’Brien, R. (1998). An overview of the methodological approach of action Research. University of Toronto. https://doi.org/10.3415/VCOT-07-10-0095eng
dcterms.referencesOuellette, G. P. (2006). What’s meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.554eng
dcterms.referencesPalinkas, L. A., Aarons, G. A., Horwitz, S., Chamberlain, P., Hurlburt, M., & Landsverk, J. (2011). Mixed method designs in implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0314-zeng
dcterms.referencesPang, Y. (2013). Graphic Organizers and Other Visual Strategies to Improve Young ELLs’ Reading Comprehension. New England Reading Association Journal.eng
dcterms.referencesPardo, L. S. (2004). What Every Teacher Needs to Know About Comprehension. The Reading Teacher. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.58.3.5eng
dcterms.referencesPearson, P. D., & Gallagher, M. C. (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-015-0283-6eng
dcterms.referencesPhil, B. (2013). Teacher and Researching Autonomy (second).eng
dcterms.referencesPiaget, J. W. F. (1971). The theory of stages in cognitive development. In Measurement and Piaget.eng
dcterms.referencesPiaget, J. (1971). The theory of stages in cognitive development. In Measurement and Piaget.eng
dcterms.referencesPiaget, Jean. (1964). Part I: Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660020306eng
dcterms.referencesPottle, J., & Pottle, J. (2018). Goldilocks and the Three Bears. Science Fiction, Science Fact! Ages 5–7, 125–145. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315265759-7eng
dcterms.referencesPourhosein Gilakjani, A., & Sabouri, N. B. (2016). A Study of Factors Affecting EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension Skill and the Strategies for Improvement. International Journal of English Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v6n5p180eng
dcterms.referencesPraveen Sam, D., & Rajan, P. (2013). Using graphic organizers to improve reading comprehension skills for the middle school ESL students. English Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n2p155eng
dcterms.referencesPressley, M., & Hilden, K. (2005). Teaching reading comprehension. In Understanding Literacy Development: A Global View. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410613332eng
dcterms.referencesPrieto Rodriguez, E. A. (2014). Improving Reading Comprehension Test Results through Direct Instruction of Metacognitive Strategies for Reading Comprehension of Eighth Graders in a Blended Learning Environment. Universidad de La Sabana. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10818/11209eng
dcterms.referencesPuteri, R. R. M. A., Yusuf, F., & Dzulkafly, Z. (2017). Facilitating Reading Comprehension among ESL Learners Using Graphic Organizers. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research.eng
dcterms.referencesQian, D. (1999). Assessing the Roles of Depth and Breadth of Vocabulary Knowledge in Reading Comprehension. Canadian Modern Language Review. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.56.2.282eng
dcterms.referencesQuinton, S., & Smallbone, T. (2010). Feeding forward: Using feedback to promote student reflection and learning - a teaching model. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290903525911eng
dcterms.referencesRAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for Understanding Toward an R & D Program in Reading Comprehension. Office of Educational Research and Improvement. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163eng
dcterms.referencesRao, S. P., & DiCarlo, S. E. (2000). Peer Instruction improves performance on quizzes. Advances in Physiology Education. https://doi.org/Articleeng
dcterms.referencesRead, S. (2010). A Model for Scaffolding Writing Instruction: IMSCI. The Reading Teacher. https://doi.org/10.1598/rt.64.1.5eng
dcterms.referencesReid, J. (1987). The Learning Style Preferences of ESL students. TESOL QUARTERLY, 21(1), 87–111.eng
dcterms.referencesRichards, J. C. (2013). Curriculum approaches in language teaching: Forward, central, and backward design. RELC Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688212473293eng
dcterms.referencesRobinson, D. H., & Skinner, C. H. (1996). Why graphic organizers facilitate search processes: Fewer words or computationally efficient indexing? Contemporary Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0014eng
dcterms.referencesSánchez Solarte, A., & Obando Guerrero, G. (2008). Is Colombia Ready for “Bilingualism”? Profile Issues in Teachers` Professional Developmenteng
dcterms.referencesSchünemann, N., Spörer, N., Völlinger, V. A., & Brunstein, J. C. (2017). Peer feedback mediates the impact of self-regulation procedures on strategy use and reading comprehension in reciprocal teaching groups. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9409-1eng
dcterms.referencesSeaman, P. D., & Nunan, D. (2006). The Learner-Centred Curriculum: A Study in Second Language Teaching. Language. https://doi.org/10.2307/414920eng
dcterms.referencesShanahan, T. (2005). The National Reading Panel Report. Practical Advice for Teachers. Learning Point Associates/North Central Regional ….eng
dcterms.referencesSiegel, H. (2010). Critical thinking. In International Encyclopedia of Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00582-0eng
dcterms.referencesSilverman, D. (2004). Qualitative Research : Theory, Method and Practice. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0703993104eng
dcterms.referencesSimmons, D. C., Griffin, C. C., & Kameenui, E. J. (1988). Effects of Teacher-Constructed Preand Post-Graphic Organizer Instruction on Sixth-Grade Science Students’ Comprehension and Recall. Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1988.10885859eng
dcterms.referencesSipe, L. R. (1998). How picture books work: A semiotically framed theory of text-picture relationships. Children’s Literature in Education. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022459009182eng
dcterms.referencesSmith, D. (2003). Five principles for research ethics. https://doi.org/10.1037/e300062003-028eng
dcterms.referencesSogunro, O. A. (2002). Selecting a quantitative or qualitative research methodology: An experience. Educational Research Quarterly.eng
dcterms.referencesSong, M. Y. (2008). Do divisible subskills exist in second language (L2) comprehension? A structural equation modeling approach. Language Testing. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532208094272eng
dcterms.referencesStrauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Basics of Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153eng
dcterms.referencesStull, A. T., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Learning by Doing Versus Learning by Viewing: Three Experimental Comparisons of Learner-Generated Versus Author-Provided Graphic Organizers. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 0663.99.4.808eng
dcterms.referencesSundeen, T. H. (2007). So What’s the Big Idea? Using Graphic Organizers to Guide Writing for Secondary Students With Learning and Behavioral Issues. Beyond Behavioreng
dcterms.referencesSweet, A., & Snow, C. (2003). Rethinking reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.44.3.1eng
dcterms.referencesTang, G. (1992). The effect of graphic representation of knowledge structures on ESL reading comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100010810eng
dcterms.referencesTashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research: An Introduction. In Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral researcheng
dcterms.referencesTashakkori, Abbas, & Creswell, J. W. (2007). Editorial: Exploring the Nature of Research Questions in Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807302814eng
dcterms.referencesThayne, S. (2018). Graphic Organizers. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0494eng
dcterms.referencesThomas, G., Martin, D., & Pleasants, K. (2011). Using self- and peer-assessment to enhance students ’ future-learning in higher education . Journal of University Teaching Learning Practice.eng
dcterms.referencesTomlinson, B. (2008). Language Acquisition and Language Learning Materials. English language learning material: A critical review.eng
dcterms.referencesTomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Developmenteng
dcterms.referencesTopping, K. J. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500345172eng
dcterms.referencesTopping, K. J. (2009a). Peer assessment. Theory into Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577569eng
dcterms.referencesTopping, K. J. (2009b). Peer assessment. Theory into Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577569eng
dcterms.referencesTrowbridge, J. E., & Wandersee, J. H. (2005). Theory-Driven Graphic Organizers. In Teaching Science for Understanding. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012498360-1/50005-2eng
dcterms.referencesTudor, I. (2001). The dynamics of the language classroom: from method to postmethod. Retrieved from http://virtualpostgrados.unisabana.edu.co/pluginfile.php/434932/mod_resource/content/1/Vi sions of Language. Tudor%2C Ian. %282001%29. The dynamics of the language classroom..pdfeng
dcterms.referencesvan Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & van Merriënboer, J. (2010). Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004eng
dcterms.referencesVanSchenkhof, M., Houseworth, M., McCord, M., & Lannin, J. (2018). Peer evaluations within experiential pedagogy: Fairness, objectivity, retaliation safeguarding, constructive feedback, and experiential learning as part of peer assessment. International Journal of Management Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.12.003eng
dcterms.referencesVaughn, S., & Edmonds, M. (2006). Reading comprehension for older readers. Intervention in School and Clinic. https://doi.org/10.1177/10534512060410030101eng
dcterms.referencesVojtková, M. N., & Kredátusová, M. (2007). The Benefits of Extensive Reading in EFL. Is. Muni. Cz.eng
dcterms.referencesVygotsky. (1978a). Interaction between learning and development. Mind and Society, 79–91.eng
dcterms.referencesVygotsky, L. S. (1978b). Interaction between learning and development. In Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006- 3495(96)79572-3eng
dcterms.referencesWeir, C. J. (1993). Testing reading comprehension. In Understanding and developing language tests.eng
dcterms.referencesWiersma, W. (2013). The Validity of Surveys: Online and Offline. Oxford Internet Institute.eng
dcterms.referencesWilliamson, K. (2017). Observation. In Research Methods: Information, Systems, and Contexts: Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102220-7.00017-0eng
dcterms.referencesWilson, S. M., & Peterson, P. L. (2006). Theories of Learning and Teaching What Do They Mean for Educators? Best Practices. Retrieved from www.nea.org/bookseng
dcterms.referencesWilson, V. (2014). View of Research Methods: Triangulation | Evidence Based Library and Information Practice.eng
dcterms.referencesWiske, M. S., & Spicer, D. E. (2010). Teacher education as teaching for understanding with new technologies. In International Encyclopedia of Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0- 08-044894-7.00671-0eng
dcterms.referencesWright, I. (2002). Challenging Students with the Tools of Critical Thinking. The Social Studies. https://doi.org/8651716eng
dcterms.referencesWu, W., & Little, T. D. (2011). Quantitative Research Methods. In Encyclopedia of Adolescence. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-373951-3.00034-Xeng
dcterms.referencesYarima CAstaño, C. R. V. cecilia D. J. L. A. G. S. V. I. (2013). Competencias, Estándares Básicos de en Lenguas Extranjeras: Inglés, El reto! Dinero, 26. Retrieved from http://www.dinero.com/edicion-impresa/opinion/articulo/el-reto-exportador/182562spa
dcterms.referencesZaini, S. H., Mokhtar, S. Z., & Nawawi, M. (2010). The Effect of Graphic Organizer on Students’ Learning in School Types of Graphic Organizer. Malaysian Journal of Educational Technologyeng
dcterms.referencesZaini, S., Mokhtar, S., & Nawawi, M. (2010). The effect of graphic organizer on student’s learning in school. Malaysian Journal of Educational Technology.eng
dcterms.referencesZeni, J. (2014). A guide to ethical issues and action research. In Ethics and Research in Inclusive Education: Values into Practice. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315018171eng
dcterms.referencesZiegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3eng
thesis.degree.disciplineDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjerases_CO
thesis.degree.levelMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomoes_CO
thesis.degree.nameMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomoes_CO


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International