Dimensión cognitiva del compromiso escolar: Control del aprendizaje, autonomía e interacción innovadora

Becerra Quintero, Yimena Yelitza

dc.contributor.advisor	Hennig Manzuoli, Cristina
dc.contributor.author	Becerra Quintero, Yimena Yelitza
dc.date.accessioned	2020-10-22T22:26:38Z
dc.date.available	2020-10-22T22:26:38Z
dc.date.issued	2020-10-02
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10818/43781
dc.description	37 páginas	es_CO
dc.description.abstract	El presente artículo tiene como finalidad presentar los resultados de la revisión sistemática de la literatura frente a la dimensión cognitiva del compromiso escolar. Se rastrearon 1522 artículos que presentaban resultados de investigación frente al tema. Los principales hallazgos están centrados en la importancia de la tarea propuesta y la relación con el futuro e intereses de los estudiantes, como forma de establecer un vínculo que le permita desarrollar las actividades con compromiso. También se destaca la relación entre los nuevos aprendizajes y las expectativas de los estudiantes, así como la integración de tecnología, el control sobre el aprendizaje, la autonomía y la capacidad de interactuar de formas innovadoras.	spa
dc.description.abstract	The purpose of this article is to present the results of the systematic review of the literature against the cognitive dimension of school commitment. A total of 1,522 articles that presented research results on the subject were tracked. The main findings are focused on the importance of the proposed task and the relationship with the future and interests of the students, as a way of establishing a link that allows them to develop activities with commitment. The relationship between new learning and student´s expectations are been also highlighted, as well as the integration of technology, control over learning, autonomy, and the ability to interact in innovative ways.	eng
dc.format	application/pdf	es_CO
dc.language.iso	spa	es_CO
dc.publisher	Universidad de La Sabana	es_CO
dc.rights	Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International	*
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/	*
dc.source	instname:Universidad de La Sabana	es_CO
dc.source	reponame:Intellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana	es_CO
dc.title	Dimensión cognitiva del compromiso escolar: Control del aprendizaje, autonomía e interacción innovadora	es_CO
dc.title.alternative	Cognitive dimension of school engagement: Control of Learning, Autonomy, and Innovative Interaction	es_CO
dc.type	masterThesis	es_CO
dc.identifier.local	279432
dc.identifier.local	TE10953
dc.type.hasVersion	publishedVersion	es_CO
dc.rights.accessRights	restrictedAccess	es_CO
dc.subject.armarc	Aprendizaje cognitivo	spa
dc.subject.armarc	Aprendizaje	spa
dc.subject.armarc	Innovaciones educativas	spa
dc.subject.armarc	Tecnologías de la información y de la comunicación	spa
dcterms.references	Akiva, T., Cortina, K. S., Eccles, J. S., & Smith, C. (2013). Youth belonging and cognitive engagement in organized activities: A large-scale field study. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 34(5), 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2013.05.001	eng
dcterms.references	Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002	eng
dcterms.references	Atapattu, T., Thilakaratne, M., Vivian, R., & Falkner, K. (2019). Detecting cognitive engagement using word embeddings within an online teacher professional development community. Computers and Education, 140(May), 103594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.020	eng
dcterms.references	Ben-Eliyahu, A., Moore, D., Dorph, R., & Schunn, C. D. (2018). Investigating the multidimensionality of engagement: Affective, behavioral, and cognitive engagement across science activities and contexts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 53(January), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.01.002	eng
dcterms.references	Beymer, P. N., Rosenberg, J. M., & Schmidt, J. A. (2020). Does choice matter or is it all about interest? An investigation using an experience sampling approach in high school science classrooms. Learning and Individual Differences, 78. https://doiorg.ez.unisabana.edu.co/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101812	eng
dcterms.references	Bircan, H., & Sunngur, S. (2016). The role of motivation and cognitive engagement in science achievement. Science Education International, 27(4), 509.	eng
dcterms.references	Bond, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through the flipped classroom approach in K12: A systematic review. Computers & Education. https://doiorg.ez.unisabana.edu.co/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103819	eng
dcterms.references	Bosma, E., & Pablos, L. (2020). Switching direction modulates the engagement of cognitive control in bilingual reading comprehension: An ERP study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 55(February), 100894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2020.100894	eng
dcterms.references	Cajiao, F. (2018) ¿Qué es el desempeño escolar? Educación, Evaluación, Pedagogía. Magisterio. https://www.magisterio.com.co/articulo/que-es-el-desempeno-escolar	spa
dcterms.references	Centro Virtual Cervantes (2020). Autonomía en el aprendizaje. https://cvc.cervantes.es/ensenanza/biblioteca_ele/diccio_ele/diccionario/autonomia.htm	spa
dcterms.references	Chapin, L. A., Deans, C. L., & Fabris, M. A. (2019). “After film club, I actually got better at everything”: School engagement and the impact of an-after-school film club. Children and Youth Services Review, 10.	eng
dcterms.references	Cheng, S. Y. S. (2013). An empirical investigation of the effectiveness of project-based course learning within hospitality programs: The mediating role of cognitive engagement. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 13, 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2013.10.002	eng
dcterms.references	Chi, M. T. H., Adams, J., Bogusch, E. B., Bruchok, C., Kang, S., Lancaster, M., Levy, R., Li, N., McEldoon, K. L., Stump, G. S., Wylie, R., Xu, D., & Yaghmourian, D. L. (2018). Translating the ICAP Theory of Cognitive Engagement into Practice. Grantee Submission, 42, 1777–1832	eng
dcterms.references	Chong, W. H., Liem, G. A. D., Huan, V. S., Kit, P. L., & Ang, R. P. (2018). Student perceptions of self-efficacy and teacher support for learning in fostering youth competencies: Roles of affective and cognitive engagement. Journal of Adolescence, 68(April 2017), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.07.002	eng
dcterms.references	Duchesne, S., Larose, S., & Feng, B. (2019). Achievement Goals and Engagement With Academic Work in Early High School: Does Seeking Help From Teachers Matter? Journal of Early Adolescence, 39(2), 222. Retrieved from https://searchebscohostcom.ez.unisabana.edu.co/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip&db=edb&AN=13386044 3&lang=es&site=eds-live&scope=site	eng
dcterms.references	Fuller, K. A., Karunaratne, N. S., Naidu, S., Exintaris, B., Short, J. L., Wolcott, M. D., … White, P. J. (2018). Development of a self-report instrument for measuring in-class student engagement reveals that pretending to engage is a significant unrecognized problem. PLoS ONE, 13(10), 1–22. https://doiorg.ez.unisabana.edu.co/10.1371/journal.pone.0205828	eng
dcterms.references	Galikyan, I., & Admiraal, W. (2019). Students’ engagement in asynchronous online discussion: The relationship between cognitive presence, learner prominence, and academic performance. Internet and Higher Education, 43(July), 100692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100692	eng
dcterms.references	Gebre, E., Saroyan, A., & Bracewell, R. (2014). Students’ engagement in technology rich classrooms and its relationship to professors’ conceptions of effective teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12001	eng
dcterms.references	Gómez Muñoz, D. P., Briceño Pira, L., & Flórez Romero, R. (2019). Usos de las TIC en preescolar: hacia la integración curricular. (Spanish). Revista Panorama, 13(24), 21. Pág. (22 – 23) https://searchebscohostcom.ez.unisabana.edu.co/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip&db=edb&AN= 135515579&lang=es&site=eds-live&scope=site	spa
dcterms.references	Granziera, H., & Perera, H. N. (2019). Relations among teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs, engagement, and work satisfaction: A social cognitive view. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58(February), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.02.003	eng
dcterms.references	Greene, B. A. (2015). Measuring Cognitive Engagement With Self-Report Scales: Reflections From Over 20 Years of Research. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 14–30. https://doiorg.ez.unisabana.edu.co/10.1080/00461520.2014.989230	eng
dcterms.references	Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2019). Learner Engagement in Blended Learning Environments: A Conceptual Framework. Online Learning, 23(2), 145–178.	eng
dcterms.references	Herrera Capita Angela María (2009) Las estrategias de aprendizaje. http://prepajocotepec.sems.udg.mx/sites/default/files/estrategias_herrera_capita_0.pdf	spa
dcterms.references	Hilton, A. (2018). Engaging Primary School Students in Mathematics: Can iPads Make a Difference? International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 16(1), 145.	eng
dcterms.references	Hung, S.-T. A. (2019). Creating Digital Stories: EFL Learners’ Engagement, Cognitive and Metacognitive Skills. Educational Technology & Society, 22(2), 26–37. Retrieved from https://search-ebscohostcom.ez.unisabana.edu.co/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip&db=eric&AN=EJ12360 13&lang=es&site=eds-live&scope=site	eng
dcterms.references	Kangas, M. (2010). Creative and playful learning: Learning through game co-creation and games in a playful learning environment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 5(1), 1–15. https://doiorg.ez.unisabana.edu.co/10.1016/j.tsc.2009.11.001	eng
dcterms.references	Lam, R., & Muldner, K. (2017). Manipulating cognitive engagement in preparation-tocollaborate tasks and the effects on learning. Learning and Instruction, 52, 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.05.002	eng
dcterms.references	Miranda-Zapata, E., Lara, L., Navarro, J.-J., Saracostti, M., & de-Toro, X. (2018). Original: Modelización del efecto del compromiso escolar sobre la asistencia a clases y el rendimiento escolar. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 23, 102–109. Recuperado de https://doiorg.ez.unisabana.edu.co/10.1016/j.psicod.2018.02.003	spa
dcterms.references	Northey, G., Govind, R., Bucic, T., Chylinski, M., Dolan, R., & van Esch, P. (2018). The effect of “here and now” learning on student engagement and academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(2), 321–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12589	eng
dcterms.references	Ochoa-Angrino, S., Montes-González, J. A., & Rojas-Ospina, T. (2018). Percepción de habilidad, reto y relevancia como predictores de compromiso cognitivo y afectivo en estudiantes de secundaria. Universitas Psychologica, 17(5), 174–191. https://doiorg.ez.unisabana.edu.co/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy17-5.phrr	spa
dcterms.references	Pan, J., & Zaff, J. F. (2019). The Measurement Structure of School Engagement Among Youth in China: An Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Study. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 37(3), 280. Retrieved from https://search-ebscohostcom.ez.unisabana.edu.co/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip&db=edb&AN=13667683 4&lang=es&site=eds-live&scope=site	eng
dcterms.references	Pendleton, D. M., Sakalik, M. L., Moore, M. L., & Tomporowski, P. D. (2016). Mental engagement during cognitive and psychomotor tasks: Effects of task type, processing demands, and practice. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 109, 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.08.012	eng
dcterms.references	Pentaraki, A., & Burkholder, G. J. (2017). Emerging Evidence Regarding the Roles of Emotional, Behavioural, and Cognitive Aspects of Student Engagement in the Online Classroom. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 20(1), 1–21. Retrieved from https://search-ebscohostcom.ez.unisabana.edu.co/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip&db=eric&AN=EJ11878 36&lang=es&site=eds-live&scope=site	eng
dcterms.references	Pietarinen, J., Soini, T., & Pyhältö, K. (2014). Students’ emotional and cognitive engagement as the determinants of well-being and achievement in school. International Journal of Educational Research, 67, 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2014.05.001	eng
dcterms.references	Pineda-Báez, C., Hennig Manzuoli, C., & Vargas Sánchez, A. (2019). Supporting student cognitive and agentic engagement: Students’ voices. International Journal of Educational Research, 96(April), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.06.005	eng
dcterms.references	Pontual Falcão, T., Mendes de Andrade e Peres, F., Sales de Morais, D. C., & da Silva Oliveira, G. (2018). Participatory methodologies to promote student engagement in the development of educational digital games. Computers & Education, 161.	eng
dcterms.references	Putarek, V., Rovan, D., & Pavlin-Bernardić, N. (2019). Relations of patterns of perfectionism to BIS sensitivity, achievement goals and student engagement. Learning and Motivation, 68(March). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2019.101596	eng
dcterms.references	Quin, D., Hemphill, S. A., & Heerde, J. A. (2017). Associations between Teaching Quality and Secondary Students’ Behavioral, Emotional, and Cognitive Engagement in School. Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal, 20(4), 807–829	eng
dcterms.references	Rastegar, A., Jahromi, R. G., Haghighi, A. S., & Akbari, A. R. (2010). The relation of epistemological beliefs and mathematics achievement: The mediating role of achievement goals, mathematics self-efficacy, and cognitive engagement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 791–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.186	eng
dcterms.references	Rigo, D & Donolo, D. (2014). Entre pupitres y pizarrones. Retos en educación primaria: el aprendizaje con compromiso. (Spanish). Education Siglo XXI, 32(2), 59. Retrieved from https://search-ebscohostcom.ez.unisabana.edu.co/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip&db=edb&AN=11078141 0&lang=es&site=eds-live&scope=site	spa
dcterms.references	Sedaghat, M., Abedin, A., Hejazi, E., & Hassanabadi, H. (2011). Motivation, cognitive engagement, and academic achievement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2406–2410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.117	eng
dcterms.references	Shukor, N. A., Tasir, Z., Van der Meijden, H., & Harun, J. (2014). A Predictive Model to Evaluate Students’ Cognitive Engagement in Online Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(2006), 4844–4853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1036	eng
dcterms.references	Walker, C. O., Greene, B. A., & Mansell, R. A. (2006). Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2005.06.004	eng
dcterms.references	Xie, K., Heddy, B. C., & Vongkulluksn, V. W. (2019). Examining engagement in context using experience-sampling method with mobile technology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59(July), 101788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101788	eng
thesis.degree.discipline	Centro de Tecnologías para la Academia	es_CO
thesis.degree.level	Maestría en Informática Educativa	es_CO
thesis.degree.name	Magíster en Informática Educativa	es_CO