Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Multi-Needs for Multi-Screening: Practices, Motivations, and Attention Distribution

dc.contributor.authorDias, Patrícia
dc.contributor.authorSerrano Puche, Javier
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-21T21:02:23Z
dc.date.available2020-01-21T21:02:23Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationDias, P. & Serrano-Puche, J. (2020). Multi-needs for multi-screening: Practices, motivations and attention distribution. Palabra Clave, 23(1), e2312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2020.23.1.2es_CO
dc.identifier.issn0122-8285
dc.identifier.otherhttps://palabraclave.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/palabraclave/article/view/9207
dc.identifier.otherhttps://palabraclave.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/palabraclave/article/view/9207/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/38957
dc.description34 páginases_CO
dc.description.abstractEl multi-screening o “pantallas múltiples” es una práctica emergente pero de crecimiento y cambio rápidos que evoluciona junto con las tecnologías que la median. Este artículo presenta un estudio sobre el multi-screening, en otras palabas, el uso simultaneo y secuencial de más de una pantalla. Con base en la teoría de usos y gratificaciones, nuestro estudio se centró en el escenario de multi-screening más común — el uso del teléfono inteligente junto con la televisión — para explorar los factores desencadenantes, las motivaciones, las gratificaciones y la distribución de la atención. La metodología es cualitativa e incluye revistas etnográficas y entrevistas de seguimiento a una muestra de 30 adultos jóvenes, y los datos se recopilaron en Portugal y España. Las actividades realizadas en cada dispositivo no suelen estar relacionadas y normalmente están motivadas por la necesidad de mejorar el entretenimiento que ofrece el televisor o de tener una sensación de eficiencia. La atención se distribuye en períodos alternados, y el teléfono inteligente tiene una mayor capacidad de exigir y mantener la atención.es_CO
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPalabra Clave, 23(1), e2312
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.subjectTelevisiónes_CO
dc.subjectTeléfono móviles_CO
dc.subjectTeléfono inteligentees_CO
dc.subjectMulti-screeninges_CO
dc.subjectAnálisis cualitativoes_CO
dc.titleMulti-Needs for Multi-Screening: Practices, Motivations, and Attention Distributiones_CO
dc.title.alternativeNecesidades múltiples para pantallas múltiples: prácticas, motivaciones y distribución de atenciónes_CO
dc.title.alternativeNecessidades múltiplas para telas múltiplas: práticas, motivações e distribuição de atençãoes_CO
dc.typearticlees_CO
dc.publisher.departmentDirección de Publicaciones
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_CO
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2020.23.1.2
dcterms.referencesBoyatzis, R. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. London, UK: Sage.eng
dcterms.referencesBrinkman, S., & Kvale, S. (2014). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. London, UK: Sage.eng
dcterms.referencesBuschow, C., Schneider, B., & Ueberheide, S. (2014). Tweeting television: Exploring communication activities on Twitter while watching TV. Communications – The European Journal of Communications Research, 39(2), 129–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2014-0009eng
dcterms.referencesCameron, J., & Geidner, N. (2014). Something old, something new, something borrowed from something blue: Experiments on dual ViewingTV and Twitter. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58(3), 400–419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.20 14.935852eng
dcterms.referencesChun, H., Lee, H., & Kim, D. (2012). The integrated model of smartphone adoption: Hedonic and utilitarian value perceptions of smartphones among Korean college students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15(9), 473–479. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0140eng
dcterms.referencesCooper, R., & Tang, T. (2009). Predicting audience exposure to television in today’s media environment: An empirical integration of active-audience and structural theories. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(3), 400–418. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1080/08838150903102204eng
dcterms.referencesD’heer, E., Courtois, C., & Paulussen, S. (2012). Everyday life in (front of) the screen: The consumption of multiple screen technologies in the living room context. EuroITV’12. Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video (pp. 195–198) July 4–6, Berlin, Germany. Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2325654eng
dcterms.referencesD’heer, E., & Courtois, C. (2014). The changing dynamics of television consumption in the multimedia living room. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 22(1), 3–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856514543451eng
dcterms.referencesD’heer, E., & Verdegem, P. (2015). What social media data mean for audience studies: A multi-dimensional investigation of Twitter use during a current affairs TV programme. Information, Communication & Society, 18(2), 221–234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/ 1369118X.2014.952318eng
dcterms.referencesDias, P. (2008). O telemóvel e o quotidiano [The mobile phone and daily life]. Lisbon, Portugal: Paulus.por
dcterms.referencesDias, P. (2016). Motivations for multi-screening: An exploratory study on motivations and gratifications. European Journal of Communication, 31(6), 678–693. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323116674111eng
dcterms.referencesDias, P. & Teixeira-Botelho, I. (2016). Multi-screening: Emergent practices, motivations and expectations. Redes.com, 13, 273–292. Retrieved from http://revista-redes.hospedagemdesites.ws/index.php/revista-redes/article/view/380eng
dcterms.referencesDucheneaut, N., Moore, R., & Oehlberg, L. (2008). Social TV: Designing for distributed, sociable television viewing. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24(2), 136–154. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1080/10447310701821426eng
dcterms.referencesDutta-Bergman, M. J. (2004). Complementarity in consumption of news types across traditional and news media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48(1), 41–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/ s15506878jobem4801_3eng
dcterms.referencesEvans, E. (2011). Transmedia television: Audiences, new media and daily life. London, UK: Routledge.eng
dcterms.referencesFortunati, L. (2002). The mobile phone: Towards new categories and social relations. Information, Communication & Society, 5(4), 513– 528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180208538803eng
dcterms.referencesFerguson, D. A., & Perse, E. M. (2000). The World Wide Web as a functional alternative to television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 155–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/ s15506878jobem4402_1eng
dcterms.referencesGibson, J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. London, UK: Allen & Unwin.eng
dcterms.referencesGiglietto, F., & Selva, D. (2014). Second screen and participation: A content analysis on a full season dataset of tweets. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 260–277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12085eng
dcterms.referencesGil de Zuñiga, H. G., Garcia-Perdomo, V., & McGregor, S. (2015). What is second screening? Exploring motivations of second screen use and its effect on online political participation. Journal of Communication, 65, 793–815. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12174eng
dcterms.referencesGoogle. (2012). The new multi-screen world: Understanding cross-platform computer behavior. Google think insights. Retrieved from https:// www.thinkwithgoogle.com/advertising-channels/mobile-marketing/the-new-multi-screen-world-study/eng
dcterms.referencesGuerrero, E., Diego, P., & Kimber, D. (2017). Hooked on lit screens / Enganchados a las pantallas. El profesional de la información, 26(6), pp. 1108–1118. Retrieved from http://www.elprofesionaldelainformacion.com/contenidos/2017/nov/10.pdfeng
dcterms.referencesHammersly, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice. London, UK: Routledge.eng
dcterms.referencesHan, E., & Lee, S.W. (2014). Motivations for the complimentary use of text-based media during linear TV-viewing: An exploratory study. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 235–243. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.015eng
dcterms.referencesHaridakis, P., & Hanson, G. (2009). Social interaction and co-viewing with YouTube: Blending mass communication reception and social connection. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150902908270eng
dcterms.referencesHo, H.Y., & Syu, L.Y. (2010). Uses and gratifications of mobile application users. Proceedings of 2010 International Conference on Electronics and Information Engineering, VI, 315–319eng
dcterms.referencesHolmes, M., Josephson, S., & Carney, R. (2012). Visual attention to TV programs with a second screen application. ETRA 2012. Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (pp. 397–400), Santa Barbara, CA.eng
dcterms.referencesHwang, Y., Kim, H., & Jeong, S. (2014). Why do media users multitask?: Motives for general, medium-specific, and content-specific types of multitasking. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 542–548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.040eng
dcterms.referencesJenkins, H. (2010). Transmedia storytelling and entertainment: An annotated syllabus. Continuum – Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 24(6), 943–958. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312. 2010.510599eng
dcterms.referencesJensen, M. (2016). The emergence of second screen gatekeeping. Digital Journalism, 4(3), 321–338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2167 0811.2015.1054408eng
dcterms.referencesJoison, A. N. (2008). Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people? Motives and use of Facebook. Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems (CHI), 26th annual SIGGCHI conference, Florence, Italy.eng
dcterms.referencesKatz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In J. G. Blumler & E. Katz (Eds.), The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research (pp. 19–32). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.eng
dcterms.referencesKatz, J. (2006). Machines that become us: The social context of personal communication Technology. New York, NY: Transaction Publishers.eng
dcterms.referencesKatz, J., & Aakhus, M. (2002). Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.eng
dcterms.referencesKim, S. J. (2014). A repertoire approach to cross-platform media use behavior. New Media & Society, 18(3), 353–372. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1177/1461444814543162eng
dcterms.referencesKramer, N., Winter, S., Benninghoff, B., & Gallus, C. (2015). How “social” is social TV? The influence of social motives and expected outcomes on the use of social TV applications. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 255–262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.005eng
dcterms.referencesLee, A. (2013). News audiences revisited: Theorizing the link between audience motivations and news consumption. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57, 300–317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.10 80/08838151.2013.816712eng
dcterms.referencesLee, J., & Shin, D. (2014). The relationship between human and smart TVs based on emotion recognition in HCI. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8582, 652–667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-319-09147-1_47eng
dcterms.referencesLevinson, P. (2004). Cellphone: The story of the world’s most mobile medium and how it has transformed everything! New York, NY: Palgrave.eng
dcterms.referencesLin, T. (2013). Convergence and regulation of multi-screen television: The Singapore experience. Telecommunications Policy, 37(8), 673–685. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2013.04.011eng
dcterms.referencesLing, R. (2004). The mobile connection: The cell phone’s impact on society. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmanneng
dcterms.referencesLochrie, M., & Coulton, P. (2012). Sharing the viewing experience through second screens. Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video (pp. 199–202). Berlin, Germany.eng
dcterms.referencesLombard, M., Ditton, T. B., Grabe, M. E., & Reich, R. D. (1997). The role of screen size in viewer responses to television fare. Communication Reports, 10, 95–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08934219709367663eng
dcterms.referencesMaxwell, J. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. London, UK: Sage.eng
dcterms.referencesMcCreery, S. P., & Krugman, D. M. (2015). TV and the iPad: How the tablet is redefining the way we watch. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(4), 620–639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0 8838151.2015.1093483eng
dcterms.referencesMcNiven, M. D., Krugman, D., & Tinkham, S. F. (2012). The big picture for large-screen television viewing. Journal of Advertising Research, 52, 421–432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-52-4-421-432eng
dcterms.referencesMicrosoft. (2013). Connected experiences, cross-screen engagement: Multiscreen pathways reveal new opportunities for marketers to reach and engage consumers. Retrieved from https://www.yumpu.com/en/ document/read/17349623/cross-screen-engagement-research-report-microsoft-advertisingeng
dcterms.referencesNandakumar, A. & Murray, J. (2014). Companion apps for long arc TV series: supporting new viewers in complex storyworlds with tightly synchronized context-sensitive annotations, TVX’14 – Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video (pp. 3–10).eng
dcterms.referencesNorman, D. (1999). Affordance, conventions and design. Interactions, 6(3), 38–43. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1145/301153.301168eng
dcterms.referencesNielsen (2015). Screen wars: The battle for eye space in a TV-everywhere world. Newswire Nielsen. Retrieved from https://www.nielsen. com/us/en/insights/report/2015/screen-wars-the-battle-foreye-space-in-a-tv-everywhere-world/eng
dcterms.referencesPérez-Tornero, J. (2008). La sociedad multipantallas: Retos para la alfabetización mediática. Comunicar, 31(16), 15–25. DOI: https://doi. org/10.3916/c31-2008-01-002spa
dcterms.referencesPhalen, P. F., & Ducey, R. V. (2012). Audience behavior in the multi-screen “video-verse”. International Journal on Media Management, 14(2), 141–156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14241277.2012.657811eng
dcterms.referencesQuan-Haase, A., & Young, A. (2010). Uses and gratifications of social media: A comparison of Facebook and Instant Messaging. Bulletin of Science Technology and Society, 30(5), 350–361. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1177/0270467610380009eng
dcterms.referencesRagin, C. (2014). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.eng
dcterms.referencesReeves, B., Lang, A., Kim, E. Y., & Tatar, D. (1999). The effects of screen size and message content on attention and arousal. Media Psychology, 1, 49–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0101_4eng
dcterms.referencesRossi, L., & Giglietto, F., (2016). Twitter use during TV: A full-season analysis of #serviziopubblico. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60(2), 331–346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151. 2016.1164162eng
dcterms.referencesRubin, A. M. (1994). Media uses and effects: a uses and gratifications perspective. In Bryant, J., Zillman, D. (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 417–436). Lawrence Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.eng
dcterms.referencesSerrano-Puche, J. (2015). Emociones en el uso de la tecnología: un análisis de las investigaciones sobre teléfonos móviles. Observatorio (OBS), 9(4), 101–112. Retrieved from https://www.academia. edu/19721736/Emociones_en_el_uso_de_la_tecnología_un_ análisis_de_las_investigaciones_sobre_teléfonos_móvilesspa
dcterms.referencesSerrano-Puche, J. (2016). Internet and emotions: New trends in an emerging field of research. Comunicar, 46, 19–26. DOI: http://doi. org/10.3916/C46-2016-02eng
dcterms.referencesShin, D. H. (2013). N-Screen: How multi-screening will impact diffusion and policy? Information, Communication & Society, 16(6), 918– 944. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.744073eng
dcterms.referencesShin, D., Shin, Y., Choo, H., & Beom, K. (2011). Smartphones as smart pedagogical tools: Implications for smartphones as u-learning devices. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2207–2214. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.06.017eng
dcterms.referencesShin, D. H., An, H., & Kim, J. H. (2015). How the second screens change the way people interact and learn: The effects of second screen use on information processing. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(5), 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1076851eng
dcterms.referencesSimons, N. (2015). TV drama as a social experience: An empirical investigation of the social dimensions of watching TV drama in the age of non-linear television. Communications – The European Journal of Communications Research, 40(2), 219–236. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1515/commun-2015-0005eng
dcterms.referencesSmith, A., & Boyles, J.L. (2012). The rise of the “connected viewer” (Pew internet & American life project). Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewinternet.org/2012/07/17/the-rise-of-theconnected-viewer/eng
dcterms.referencesVaccari, C., Chadwick, A., & O’Loughlin, B. (2015). Dual screening the political: Media events, social media, and citizen engagement. Journal of Communication, 65(6), 1041–1061. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1111/jcom.12187eng
dcterms.referencesVan Cauwenberge, A., Schaap, G., & Van Roy, R. (2014). “TV no longer commands our full attention”: Effects of second-screen viewing and task relevance on cognitive load and learning from news. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 100–109. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.021eng
dcterms.referencesVan Cauwenberge, A., d’Haenens, L., & Beetjes, H. (2015). How to take advantage of tablet computers: Effects of news structure on recall and comprehension. Communications – The European Journal of Communications Research, 40(4), 425–446. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1515/commun-2015-0020eng
dcterms.referencesVergeer, M., & Franses, P. H. (2016). Live audience responses to live televised election debates: Time series analysis of issue salience and party salience on audience behavior. Information, Communication & Society, 19(10), 1390–1410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1 369118X.2015.1093526eng
dcterms.referencesWang, Z., & Tchernev, J. M. (2012). The “myth” of media multitasking: Reciprocal dynamics of media multitasking, personal needs, and gratifications. Journal of Communication, 62(3), 493–513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01641.xeng
dcterms.referencesWeeks, B. E., & Holbert, R. L. (2013). Predicting dissemination of news content in social media a focus on reception, friending, and partisanship. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90(2), 212– 232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699013482906eng
dcterms.referencesWei, R. (2008). Motivations for using the mobile phone for mass communication and entertainment. Telematics & Informatics, 25, 36–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2006.03.001eng
dcterms.referencesWellman, B., Quan-Haase, A., Boase, J., Chen, W., Hampton, K., Diaz de Isla, I. & Miyata, K. (2006). The Social Affordances of the Internet for networked individualism, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 8(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2003. tb00216.xeng


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International