Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

The usage of controversial topics and peer feedback to foster adult learners’ fluency

dc.contributor.advisorCuesta Medina, Liliana Marcela
dc.contributor.authorBucheli Guevara, Ibeth Angelica
dc.contributor.authorGaleano Palencia, Jennifer
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-14T16:04:19Z
dc.date.available2018-11-14T16:04:19Z
dc.date.issued2018-10-05
dc.identifier.citationAl-Shboul, M.M., Ahmad, I.S., Nordin, M.S., Rahman, Z.A. (2013). Foreign language anxiety and achievement: Systematic review. International Journal of English Linguistics, 3, 32–45
dc.identifier.citationAskari, K., & Langroudi, J. (2014). The effectiveness of Ur model in developing Iranian EFL learners’ fluency and accuracy in speaking. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 1(1), 75-86.
dc.identifier.citationAusubel, D. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
dc.identifier.citationBerdine, R. (1987). Increasing student involvement in the learning process through debate on controversial topics. Journal of Marketing Education 9 (3), 6–8.
dc.identifier.citationBecker, H., & Geer, B. (1969). Participant observation: a comparison. In G. J. McCall and J. L. Simmons (Eds), Issues in Participant Observation (pp. 322-331). New York: Random House.
dc.identifier.citationBello, I. (2012). A language-in-use study of EFL students’ social discourses in project-based learning. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 14(1), 108-126
dc.identifier.citationBlaxter, L., Hughes, C., Tight, M. (2010). How to research. Buckingham: Open University Press. Retrieved from https://www.mheducation.co.uk/openup/chapters/0335209033.pdf
dc.identifier.citationBoers, F. (2014). A reappraisal of the 4/3/2 activity. RELC Journal, 45(3), 221-235.
dc.identifier.citationBrookefield, S. (2006). Discussion as a way of teaching [PDF document]. Retrieved from http://webshare.northseattle.edu/Sustainability_in_Healthcare/Discussion as_a_Way_of_Teaching%20INC-Learning%20Circles.pdf
dc.identifier.citationBrookfield, S., & Preskill, S. (1999). Discussion as a Way of Teaching. San Francisco: JosseyBass.
dc.identifier.citationBrown, D. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
dc.identifier.citationCarless, D., & Liu, M. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279–290.
dc.identifier.citationCarter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The Use of Triangulation in Qualitative Research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545–547. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547
dc.identifier.citationChambers, F. (1997). What do we mean by fluency? System, 25(4), 535–44.
dc.identifier.citationChen, T. (2014). Technology-supported peer feedback in ESL/EFL writing classes: a research synthesis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 365-397. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.960942
dc.identifier.citationClarke, P. (1991). Teaching controversial issues. Green Teacher, 31, 9-13. Retrieved from http://oe32012-2013.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/5/0/13504411/clarke_pat_- _teaching_controversial_issues.pdf
dc.identifier.citationCohen, L., Manion, L, Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. London: Routledge. Retrieved from: https://islmblogblog.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/rme-edu-helplineblogspot-com.pdf
dc.identifier.citationCorbin, J., Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3-21. Retrieved from http://med-fom-familymedresearch.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2012/03/W10-Corbin-and-Strauss-grounded-theory.pdf
dc.identifier.citationCorbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
dc.identifier.citationCouncil of Europe. (2001). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Council of Europe, 1–273.
dc.identifier.citationCotton, D. R. E. (2006). Teaching controversial environmental issues: neutrality and balance in the reality of the classroom, Educational Research, 48(2), 223-241, https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880600732306
dc.identifier.citationCreswell, W. J. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://ucalgary.ca/paed/files/paed/2003_creswell_a-framework-for-design.pdf
dc.identifier.citationDarn, S. (2006). CLIL: a European overview. ERIC Digest. Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED490775.pdf
dc.identifier.citationDearden, R. (1981). Controversial issues in the curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 13(1), 37-44.
dc.identifier.citationDemirezen, M. (2011). The foundations of the communicative approach and three of its applications. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 7(1), 57–71.
dc.identifier.citationDe Jong, N., Steinel, M., Florijn, A., Schoonen, R. & Hulstijn, J. (2011). Linguistic skills and speaking fluency in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 893–916. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716412000069
dc.identifier.citationDuque Micán, A., & Cuesta Medina, L. (2017). Boosting vocabulary learning through selfassessment in an English language teaching context. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3), 398–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1118433
dc.identifier.citationEllis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press
dc.identifier.citationEvripidou, D. & Çavuşoğlu, C. (2015). English language teachers’ attitudes towards the incorporation of gay- and lesbian-related topics in the classroom: The case of Greek Cypriot EFL teachers. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 12(1), 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-014-0176-3
dc.identifier.citationFalchikov, N. (2001). Learning together: peer tutoring in higher education. London: Routledge Falmer.
dc.identifier.citationFillmore, C. J. (1979). On fluency. In Fillmore, C.J., Kempler, D., and Wang, W. S. J. (eds), Individual differences in language ability and language behaviour. New York: Academic Press.
dc.identifier.citationFreeman, M. 1995: Peer assessment by groups of group work. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 20, 289–99.
dc.identifier.citationFulcher, G. (1996). Does thick description lead to smart tests? A data-based approach to rating scale construction. Language Testing, 13(2), 208–238. https://doi.org/doi:10.1177/026553229601300205
dc.identifier.citationFulcher, G. (2003). Testing Second Language Speaking. Harlow: Pearson Longman. Retrieved from http://www.lttc.ntu.edu.tw/E_LTTC/E_GEPT/Advanced.htm
dc.identifier.citationGatbonton, E., & Segalowitz, N. (2005). Rethinking communicative language teaching: A focus on access to fluency. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 61, 325–353. https://doi.org/doi:10.1353/cml.2005.0016
dc.identifier.citationGraseck, S. (2009). Teaching with Controversy. Educational Leadership, 67(1), 45-49.
dc.identifier.citationHand, M., & Levinson, R. (2012). Discussing Controversial Issues in the Classroom. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(6), 614–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469- 5812.2010.00732.x
dc.identifier.citationHarmer, J. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching. Harlow: Pearson
dc.identifier.citationHarwood, A., & Hahn, C. (1990). Controversial Issues in the Classroom. ERIC Digest, 1-8. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED327453.pdf
dc.identifier.citationHatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (2003). When is conceptual change intended? A cognitive sociocultural view. In G. M. Sinatra, & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change. Mahwah: Erlbaum
dc.identifier.citationHigher Education Academy (2018). Flipped learning. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/flipped-learning-0
dc.identifier.citationHorwitz, E. (1986). Preliminary evidence for the reliability and validity of a foreign language anxiety scale. TESOL Quarterly, 20(3), 559–562. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
dc.identifier.citationHulsman, R. L., & Van der Vloodt, J. (2015). Self-evaluation and peer-feedback of medical students' communication skills using a web-based video annotation system. Exploring content and specificity. Patient Education and Counseling, 98(3), 356- 363.
dc.identifier.citationInternational House London. (2014). Number of English language learners keeps on growing. Retrieved from http://www.ihlondon.com/news/2014/number-of-english-language-learnerskeeps-on-growing/
dc.identifier.citationJohnson, R.B. and Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2004) Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33, 14-26
dc.identifier.citationKayi, H (2006). Teaching speaking: Activities to promote speaking in a second language. The Internet TESL Journal, 12 (11). Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Techniques/KayiTeachingSpeaking.html
dc.identifier.citationKolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Retrieved from https://academic.regis.edu/ed205/kolb.pdf
dc.identifier.citationKoulouriotis, J. (2011). Ethical considerations in conducting research with non-native speakers of English. TESL Canada Journal, 5, 1-15.
dc.identifier.citationLennon, P. (1990). Investigating Fluency in EFL: A Quantitative Approach. Language Learning, 40(3), 387–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00669.x
dc.identifier.citationLevelt, W. (1989). Speaking: from intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
dc.identifier.citationLiu, M., & Huang, W. (2011). An Exploration of Foreign Language Anxiety and English Learning Motivation. Education Research International, 2011, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/493167
dc.identifier.citationMacAndrew, R., & Martínez, R. (2002). Taboos and Issues. Boston: Heinle.
dc.identifier.citationMacIntyre, P. D., Dornyei, Z., Clement, R., & Noels, K. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. Modern Language Journal, 82, 545-62.
dc.identifier.citationMackey, A. & Gass, S. (2005). Second language research: methodology and design. Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum
dc.identifier.citationMagendzo, A. (2016). Incorporando la perspectiva controversial en el currículum disciplinario. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior, 7, 118–130.
dc.identifier.citationMason, L., & Scirica, F. (2006). Prediction of students’ argumentation skills about controversial topics by epistemological understanding. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.09.007
dc.identifier.citationMaurice, K. (1983). The fluency workshop. TESOL Newsletter, 17(4), 29
dc.identifier.citationMolina, M., Briesmaster, M. (2017). The use of the 3/2/1 technique to foster students' speaking fluency. i.e.: inquiry in education, 9(2), 1-13. Retrieved from: https://digitalcommons.nl.edu/ie/vol9/iss2/8
dc.identifier.citationNation, P. (1989). Improving speaking fluency. System, 17(3), 377–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(89)90010-9
dc.identifier.citationNilson, L. B. (2003). Improving Student Peer Feedback. College Teaching, 51(1), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567550309596408
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching & learning. Boston: Heinle and Heinle publishers.
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D., & Bailey, K. M. (2009). Exploring second language classroom research: A comprehensive guide. Boston, MA: Heinle, Cengage Learning.
dc.identifier.citationOulton, C., Dillon, J., & Grace, M. (2004). Reconceptualizing the Teaching of Controversial Issues. Research Report. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 411–423
dc.identifier.citationOxford, R. (2017). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. New York: Routledge
dc.identifier.citationPattanpichet, F. (2011). The effects of using collaborative learning to enhance students’ English speaking achievement. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 8(11), 1-11.
dc.identifier.citationPark, H., & Lee, A. R. (Eds.). (2005). L2 learners’ anxiety, self-confidence and oral performance. 10th Conference of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, Edinburgh University, conference proceedings (197-208). http://www.paaljapan.org/resources/proceedings/PAAL10/pdfs/hyesook.pdf
dc.identifier.citationPeat, J., Mellis, C., Williams, K. and Xuan W. (2002), Health Science Research: A Handbook of Quantitative Methods. London: Sage.
dc.identifier.citationPereira, J. A., Sanz-Santamaría, S., Montero, R., & Gutiérrez, J. (2012). Innovative second language speaking practice with interactive videos in a rich internet application environment. International Education Studies, 5(6), 272–283. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v5n6p272
dc.identifier.citationPourhossein, A. (2014). Classroom interaction and developing speaking skill. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/7140820/Classroom_Interaction_and_Developing_Speaking_Skill
dc.identifier.citationPhillips, E. M. (1992). The effects of language anxiety on students’ oral test performance and attitudes. The Modern Language Journal, 76(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540- 4781.1992.tb02573.x
dc.identifier.citationRichards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationRichards, J. C. (2008). Teaching listening and speaking: from theory to practice. New York: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://www.finchpark.com/courses/tkt/Unit_07/Richards-Teaching-Listening-Speaking.pdf
dc.identifier.citationRiggenbach, H. (1991). Toward an understanding of fluency: A microanalysis of nonnative speaker conversations. Discourse Processes, 14(4), 423–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539109544795
dc.identifier.citationRollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal, 59(1), 23–30. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci003
dc.identifier.citationRossiter, M. J., Derwing, T. M., Manimtim, L. G., & Thomson, R. I. (2010). Oral Fluency: The Neglected Component in the Communicative Language Classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66(4), 583–606. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.66.4.583
dc.identifier.citationRubin, J. (2003). Diary writing as a process: simple, useful, powerful. Retrieved from http://www.workingnet.com/joanrubin/pdfs/Singaporepaper2003.pdf
dc.identifier.citationRuegg, R. (2014). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on changes in EFL students’ writing self-efficacy. The Language Learning Journal, 87-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.958190
dc.identifier.citationRyczek, M. (2012). Promoting oral fluency in the ESL classroom: An introduction to the 4/3/2 fluency activity. CELE Journal, 21(62), 30-42
dc.identifier.citationSato & Lyster (2012) Peer interaction and corrective feedback for accuracy and fluency development: Monitoring, practice, and proceduralization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 591– 626. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000356
dc.identifier.citationSato, M., & Perry, B. (2011). How to transform second language learners into interactive corrective feedback providers. In K. Bradford-Watts, E. M. Skier & M. Walsh (Eds), PanSIG 2010 Conference Proceedings. Kyoto: JALT.
dc.identifier.citationSegalowitz, N. (2010). Cognitive bases of second language fluency. New York: Routledge
dc.identifier.citationSchunk, D. H. (1990). Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2501_6
dc.identifier.citationSchmidt, R. (1983). Interaction, acculturation and the acquisition of communicative competence. In N. Wolfson & E. Judd (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition (pp. 137–174). Rowley, Mass: Newbury House.
dc.identifier.citationSchmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158. Retrieved from http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/PDFs/SCHMIDT%20The%20role%20of%20consciousness%20in% 20second%20language%20learning.pdf
dc.identifier.citationStradling, B. (1985). Controversial issues in the curriculum. Bulletin of Environmental Education, 170, 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027810130105
dc.identifier.citationSwain, M. (1985) Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Gass, S. M., and Madden, C. G. (eds), Input in Second Language Acquisition. Massachusetts: Newbury House.
dc.identifier.citationTekin, M. (2011). Discussing the Unspeakable: a Study on the Use of Taboo Topics in the EFL. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 7(1), 79–110.
dc.identifier.citationToledo, M., Magendzo, A., Gutiérrez, V., & Iglesias, R. (2015). Enseñanza de 'temas controversiales' en la asignatura de historia y ciencias sociales desde la perspectiva de los profesores. Estudios pedagógicos, 41(1), 275-292. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718- 07052015000100016
dc.identifier.citationTomlinson, B. (2010). Principles and procedures for self-access materials. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 1(2), 72-86
dc.identifier.citationTorres, F. S. (2000). Testing accuracy and fluency in speaking through communicative activities. HOW, 5(1), 95–104. Retrieved from https://www.howjournalcolombia.org/index.php/how/article/view/236
dc.identifier.citationWitton-Davies, G. (2013). The study of fluency and its development in monologue and dialogue (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Lancaster University. Retrieved from http://www.forex.ntu.edu.tw/en/files/writing/4092_dc0088cd.pdf
dc.identifier.citationYang, Y. (2014). The implementation of speaking fluency in communicative language teaching: An observation of adopting the 4/3/2 activity in high schools in China. International Journal of English Language Education, 2(1), 193-214
dc.identifier.citationYoshida, R. (2018). Learners' perception of corrective feedback in pair work. Foreign Language Annals, 41(3), 525-541
dc.identifier.citationYu, S., & Hu, G. (2017). Understanding university students’ peer feedback practices in EFL writing: Insights from a case study. Assessing Writing, 33, 25–35. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2017.03.004
dc.identifier.citationYu, S., Lee, I. (2016). Peer feedback in second language writing (2005–2014). Language Teaching, 49(4), 461-493. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000161
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/34420
dc.description83 Páginases_CO
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to analyze the influence of debate on controversial topics in adult students’ speaking fluency through the support of peer feedback. The study was conducted with eight young adult learners with a B1 English proficiency level according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) at two different public universities, one located in Barranquilla and the other in Bogotá, Colombia. After observation and a needs analysis, it was found that students faced difficulties with speaking activities which leaded to propose the present study. Data was collected through a mixed method design approach in which qualitative data was gathered from surveys and students’ diaries and quantitative data from a pre test and post-test in the form of audio recordings. Information was analyzed through the grounded theory method. Findings revealed students’ engagement when discussing controversial topics, thus they tried to create solid arguments to defend their point of view. Peer feedback served to raise students’ error and improvement awareness and at the same time helped them increase their confidence when interacting with their partners. Both debate on controversial topics and peer feedback fostered participants' speaking fluency as they gained ease at speaking, raised their awareness, and developed their argument skills.es_CO
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.subjectEducación de adultoses_CO
dc.subjectInglés -- Enseñanzaes_CO
dc.subjectRetroalimentación (comunicación)es_CO
dc.titleThe usage of controversial topics and peer feedback to foster adult learners’ fluencyes_CO
dc.typemasterThesises_CO
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigido (Virtual)es_CO
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjerases_CO
dc.identifier.local270008
dc.identifier.localTE09869
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsrestrictedAccesses_CO
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigidoes_CO


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
Ibeth Bucheli y Jennifer Galeano ...
Tamaño:
1.678Mb
Formato:
PDF
Descripción:
Ver documento en PDF
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International