Apresentar o registro simples

dc.contributor.advisorTernent de Samper, Ana María
dc.contributor.advisorBryan Zambrano, Nohora Edith
dc.contributor.authorPrieto Sanchez, Diana Gabriela
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-11T21:51:44Z
dc.date.available2015-11-11T21:51:44Z
dc.date.created2015
dc.date.issued2015-11-11
dc.identifier.citationArtino, A. R., & Jones, K. D. (2012). Exploring the complex relations between achievement emotions and self-regulated learning behaviors in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 170-175. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.01.006
dc.identifier.citationBartomolé, A., & Steffens, K. (2011). Technologies for self-regulated learning. In R, Carneiro, P. Lefrere, K. Steffens, & J. Underwood (Eds.), Self-regulated learning in technology enhanced learning environments (Vol. 5, pp. 21-31), Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers
dc.identifier.citationBeatty, K. (2010). Teaching and researching Computer-Assisted Language Learning (2nd ed.). London, England: Pearson Education Limited.
dc.identifier.citationBeishuizen, J., & Steffens, K. (2011). A conceptual framework for research on selfregulated learning. In R, Carneiro, P. Lefrere, K. Steffens, & J. Underwood (Eds.), Self-regulated learning in technology enhanced learning environments (Vol. 5, pp. 3-20), Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
dc.identifier.citationBenson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching learner autonomy. Harlow, Essex: Person Education Limited.
dc.identifier.citationBenson, P. (2007). Autonomy in language teaching. Language Teaching, 40(1), 21-40. doi: 10.1017/S0261444806003958
dc.identifier.citationBenson, P. (2013). Learner autonomy. TESOL Quarterly, 47(4), 839-843. doi:10.1002/tesq.134
dc.identifier.citationBlin, F. (2004) CALL and the development of learner autonomy: Towards an activity theoretical perspective. ReCALL, 16(2), 377–395. doi:10.1017/S0958344004000928
dc.identifier.citationBoote, D. N., & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational Researcher, 34(6), 3-15. doi:10.3102/0013189X034006003
dc.identifier.citationBroadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies and academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007
dc.identifier.citationCandy, P. C. (1991). Self-direction for lifelong learning: A comprehensive guide to theory and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
dc.identifier.citationChapelle, C.A. (2003). English language learning and technology. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing
dc.identifier.citationChen, C.-M, Wang, J.-Y., & Chen, Y.-C. (2014). Facilitating English-language reading performance by a digital reading annotation system with self-regulated learning mechanisms. Educational Technology & Society, 17 (1), 102–114. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.17.1.102
dc.identifier.citationDucate, L., & Arnold, N. (2011). Technology, CALL, and the net generation: Where are we headed from here?. In L. Ducate, & N. Arnold (Eds.), Present and future promises of CALL: From theory and research to new directions in language teaching (Vol. 5, pp. 1-22). United States: CALICO
dc.identifier.citationDudeney, G., Hockly, N., & Pegrum, M. (2013). Digital literacies: Research and resources in language teaching. Harlow, UK: Pearson.
dc.identifier.citationDickinson, L. (1995). Autonomy and motivation: a literature review. System, 23(2), 165- 174. doi: 10.1016/0346-251X(95)00005-5
dc.identifier.citationEgbert, J. (2005). CALL essentials: Principles and practice in CALL classrooms. Alexandria VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
dc.identifier.citationEllis, R.D. (2012). Language teaching research & language pedagogy. Malden, MA: Wiley- Blackwell
dc.identifier.citationEPPI-Centre (2002a) Core Keywording Strategy: Data Collection for a Register of Educational Research. Version 0.9.7. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
dc.identifier.citationEPPI-Centre (2003a) Core Keywording Strategy: Data Collection for a Register of Educational Research. Version 0.9.7. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
dc.identifier.citationEPPI-Centre (2003b) Review Guidelines for Extracting Data and Quality Assessing Primary Studies in Educational Research. Version 0.9.7. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London
dc.identifier.citationEwell, P (2001). Accreditation and student learning outcomes: A proposed point of departure (National Center for Higher Education Management Systems Report). Retrieved from Council for Higher Education Accreditation website: http://www.chea.org/pdf/EwellSLO_Sept2001.pdf
dc.identifier.citationFelix, U. (2005). Analysing recent CALL effectiveness research: Towards a common agenda. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(1), 1-32. doi:10.1080/09588220500132274
dc.identifier.citationFischer, G., & Scharff, E. (1998). Learning technologies in support of self-directed learning. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 98(4), 1-32, Retrieved from: wwwjime.open.ac.uk/98/4
dc.identifier.citationGarrison, D.R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(1), 18-33. Retrieved from http://www.researchgate.net/publication/249698827
dc.identifier.citationGough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2012). Introducing systematic reviews. In D. Gough, S. Oliver, & J. Thomas (Eds.), An introduction to systematic reviews (pp. 1-16). London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd.
dc.identifier.citationHubbard, P. (2005). A review of subject characteristics in CALL research. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(5), 351-368. doi:10.1080/09588220500442632
dc.identifier.citationIrie, K., & Stewart, A. (2012). Realizing autonomy: Practice and reflection in language education contexts. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
dc.identifier.citationJossberger, H., Brand-Gruwel, S., Boshuizen, H., & Wiel, M. (2010). The challenge of self-directed and self-regulated learning in vocational education: A theoretical analysis and synthesis of requirements. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 62(4), 415-440. doi: 10.1080/13636820.2010.523479
dc.identifier.citationKhan, K.S., Kunz, R., Kleijnen, J. & Antes, G. (2003). Five steps to conducting a systematic review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 96, 118-121. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC539417/
dc.identifier.citationKondo, M., Ishikawa, Y., Smith, C., Sakamoto, K., Shimomura, H., & Wada, N. (2012). Mobile assisted language learning in university EFL courses in Japan: Developing attitudes and skills for self-regulated learning. ReCALL, 24(02), 169-18. doi: 10.1017/S0958344012000055
dc.identifier.citationLai, Ch. (2015). Modeling teachers’ influence on learners’ self-directed use of technology for language learning outside the classroom. Computers & Education,82, 74-83. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.005
dc.identifier.citationLai, C., & Gu, M. (2011). Self-regulated out-of-class language learning with technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(4), 317-335. doi:10.1080/09588221.2011.568417
dc.identifier.citationLamb, T. E., & Reinders, H. (Eds.). (2008). Learner and teacher autonomy: Concepts, realities, and responses. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
dc.identifier.citationLan, Y.-J. (2013). The effect of technology-supported co-sharing on L2 vocabulary strategy development. Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 1–16. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.16.4.1
dc.identifier.citationLee, L. (2011). Blogging: Promoting learner autonomy and intercultural competence through study abroad. Language Learning & Technology, 15(3), 87-109. Retrieved from: http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2011/lee.pdf
dc.identifier.citationLevy, M., & Stockwell, G. (2006). CALL dimensions: Options and issues in ComputerAssisted Language Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
dc.identifier.citationLewis, T., & Vialleton, E. (2011). The notions of control and consciousness in learner autonomy and self-regulated learning: A comparison and critique. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 5(2), 205-219. doi:10.1080/17501229.2011.577535
dc.identifier.citationLittle, D. (1991). Learner Autonomy 1: Definitions, Issues and Problems. Dublin, Ireland: Authentik
dc.identifier.citationLittle, D., Ridley, J., & Ushioda, E. (Eds.). (2003). Learner autonomy in the foreign language classroom: Teacher, learner, curriculum and assessment. Dublin, Ireland: Authentik
dc.identifier.citationLord, G., & Lomicka, L. (2011). Calling on educators: Paving the way for the future of technology and CALL. In L. Ducate, & N. Arnold (Eds.), Present and future promises of CALL: From theory and research to new directions in language teaching (Vol. 5, pp. 441-469). United States: CALICO.
dc.identifier.citationLoyens, S.M.M., Magda, J., & Rikers, R.M.J.P. (2008). Self-directed learning in problem-based learning and its relationships with self-regulated learning. Education Psychology Review, 20, 411-427. doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9082-7
dc.identifier.citationMacaro, E., Handley, Z., & Walter, C. (2012). A systematic review of CALL in English as a second language: Focus on primary and secondary education. Language Teaching, 45(1), 1- 43. doi:10.1017/S0261444811000395
dc.identifier.citationMcLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. (2010). Personalised and self regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 28-43. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ877551
dc.identifier.citationMcLoughlin, C., & Lee, M.J.W. (2008). The three P’s of pedagogy for the networked society: Personalization, participation, and productivity. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(1), 10-27. Retrieved from http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/
dc.identifier.citationNarciss, S., Prose, A., & Koerndle, H. (2007). Promoting self-regulated learning in webbased learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1126-1144. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.10.006
dc.identifier.citationO'Malley, J. M. and Chamot, A. V. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. London, UK: Macmillan.
dc.identifier.citationOkoli, C., & Schabram, K. (2010). A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 10(26), 1-49. Retrieved from http://sprouts.aisnet.org/10-26
dc.identifier.citationOxford, R. 1990. Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Rowley, MA: Newbory House
dc.identifier.citationPemberton, R., Li, E. S. L., Or, W. W. F., & Pierson, H. D. (Eds.). (1996). Taking control: Autonomy in language learning. Hong Kong, China: Hong Kong University Press.
dc.identifier.citationPeters, O. (1998). Learning and teaching in distance education: Analyses and interpretations from an international perspective. London, UK: Kogan Page.
dc.identifier.citationPilling-Cormick, J., & Garrison, D.R. (2007). Self-directed and self-regulated learning: Conceptual links. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 33(2), 13-33. Retrieved from http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/cjuce-rcepu/article/view/19964/15474
dc.identifier.citationSaks, K., & Leijen, Ä. (2014). Distinguishing self-directed and self-regulated learning and measuring them in the e-learning context. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 190-198. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1155
dc.identifier.citationSha,L., Looi, C.-K, Chen, W., & Zhang, B.H. (2011). Understanding mobile learning from the perspective of self-regulated learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28, 366- 378. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00461.x
dc.identifier.citationSmith, K., & Craig, H. (2013). Enhancing the autonomous use of CALL: A new curriculum model in EFL. CALICO Journal, 30(2), 252-278. doi: 10.1558/cj.v30i2.252-278
dc.identifier.citationSong, L., & Hill, J. R. (2007). A conceptual model for understanding self-directed learning in online environments. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(1), 27-42. Retrieved from http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/6.1.3.pdf
dc.identifier.citationSun, S. Y. (2014). Learner perspectives on fully online language learning. Distance education, 35(1), 18-42. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2014.891428
dc.identifier.citationTorgerson, C. (2003). Systematic reviews. London, UK: Continuum.
dc.identifier.citationUshioda, E. (2011). Why autonomy? Insights from motivation theory and research. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 5(2), 221-232. doi: 10.1080/17501229.2011.577536
dc.identifier.citationVictor, L. (2008). Systematic reviewing in the social sciences: Outcomes and explanation. Enquire, 1(1), 32-46. Retrieved from https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/sociology/pdfs/enquire/volume-1-issue-1-victor.pdf
dc.identifier.citationWenden, A. & J. Rubin. (1987). Learner strategies in language learning. Englewood Cliffs , NJ: Prentice Hall.
dc.identifier.citationYang, Y. (2010). Computer-assisted foreign language teaching: Theory and practice. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(6), 909-912. doi:10.4304/jltr.1.6.909-912
dc.identifier.citationZimmerman, B.J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B.J. Zimmerman, & D.H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 1-38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/20001
dc.description84 páginas incluye diagramas
dc.description.abstractEsta tesis es una revisión sistemática de la literatura en estudios que se han producido en el periodo 2011-2015. Se analiza la relación Aprendizaje del Lenguaje Asistido por Computador (CALL, por su acrónimo en inglés), Aprendizaje Auto-Regulado (SRL), y/o Aprendizaje AutoDirigido (SDL) en ambientes de aprendizaje del estudio de la lengua extranjera. La investigación se divide en dos fases. La primera de ellas ofrece una caracterización de los estudios seleccionados. La segunda fase es una revisión detallada de las definiciones de SDL y / o SRL y un análisis de la evidencia de los resultados de aprendizaje que ofrecen dichos estudios.es_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.subjectInglés comercial -- Colombia
dc.subjectLenguaje y lenguas
dc.subjectInglés básico
dc.titleTechnology reshaping the EFL classroomes_CO
dc.typemasterThesis
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigido
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjeras
dc.identifier.local176134
dc.identifier.localTE07872
dc.type.localTesis de maestría
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_CO
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigido


Arquivos deste item

Thumbnail

Este item aparece na(s) seguinte(s) coleção(s)

Apresentar o registro simples