Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.advisorRodríguez Bonces, Mónica Alisandra
dc.contributor.authorOrtiz Ordonez, Kris Evelin
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-03T23:54:14Z
dc.date.available2014-09-03T23:54:14Z
dc.date.created2014
dc.date.issued2014-09-03
dc.identifier.citationAnderson, T., & Dron, J. (2007). Groups, Networks and Collectives in Social Software for E-learning. Paper presented at 2007 European Conference on E-Learning, Copenhagen
dc.identifier.citationAntenos-Conforti, E. (2009). Microblogging on Twitter: Social Networking in Intermediate Italian Classes. The Next Generation: Social Networking and Online Collaboration in Foreign Language Learning. Eds. L. Lomicka and G. Lord. Texas: CALICO.
dc.identifier.citationAziz, G. (2003). Cognitive Apprenticeship, Technology, and the Contextualization of Learning Environments. Journal of Educational Computing. Design & Online Learning.Vol. 4, 2003.
dc.identifier.citationBeldarrain, Y. (2006). Distance Education Trends: Integrating New Technologies to Foster Student Interaction and Collaboration. Distance Education, 27(2) (pp. 139-153). Brandes, G.M., & Boskic, N. (2008). Eportfolios: From Description to Analysis. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(2), 1-17. Retrieved from ERIC.
dc.identifier.citationBrandes, G.M., & Boskic, N. (2008). Eportfolios: From Description to Analysis. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(2), 1-17. Retrieved from ERIC.
dc.identifier.citationBrindley, J., Walti, C., Blaschke, L. (2009). Creating Effective Collaborative Learning Groups in an Online Environment. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. Vol 3, 10.
dc.identifier.citationBrown, S. W., & King, F. B. (2000). Constructivist Pedagogy and How we Learn: Educational Psychology Meets International Studies. International Studies Perspectives, 1(3), 245-255.
dc.identifier.citationCarter, R., and Nunan, D. (2001). The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationChiong, R and Jovanovic, J. (2012). Collaborative Learning in Online Study Groups: An Evolutionary Game Theory Perspective. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research. Vol 11.
dc.identifier.citationCollins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1987). Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing and Mathematics (Technical Report No. 403). BBN. Laboratories, Cambridge, MA. Centre for the Study of Reading, University of Illinois.
dc.identifier.citationDennen, V. P., Burner, K. J. (2008) The Cognitive Apprenticeship Model in Educational Practice. Florida: Florida State University
dc.identifier.citationDillenbourg, P. (1999). Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. Advances in Learning and Instruction Series. New York, NY: Elsevier Science, Inc.
dc.identifier.citationDudeney, G. (2007). The Internet and the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationEspitia, M. and Cruz, C. (2013). Peer Feedback and Online Interaction: A Case Study. Ikala. Medellin.
dc.identifier.citationGall, M. D., Gall, J. P., and Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational Research: An Introduction. (8th edition). Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
dc.identifier.citationJonassen, D. H. (2004). Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. New Yersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
dc.identifier.citationKessler, G. (2009). Student-Initiated Attention to Form in Wiki-based Collaborative Writing. Language Learning & Technology, 13(1), 79–95. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol13num1/kessler.pdf
dc.identifier.citationKim, E, Park, S, and Baek, S. (2011). Twitter and Implications for its Use in EFL Learning. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 14(2), 113-137.
dc.identifier.citationKvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
dc.identifier.citationLaal, M., Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of Collaborative Learning. Procedia. Social and Behavioral Sciences. Volume 31, 486-490. Retrieved from: www.sciencedirect.com August, 2014
dc.identifier.citationLiu, T.-C. (2005). Web-based Cognitive Apprenticeship Model for Improving Preservice Teachers’ Performances and Attitudes towards Instructional Planning: Design and Field Experiment. Educational Technology & Society, 8 (2), 136- 149.
dc.identifier.citationMills, G. (2003) Action Research: A Guide for the Teacher Researcher. Oregon: Pearson.
dc.identifier.citationOppenheim, A.N. (1992). Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement. London: Pinter Publishers.
dc.identifier.citationPalloff, R. M., and Pratt, K. (2005). Collaborating Online: Learning Together in Community. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
dc.identifier.citationPelletieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in Cyberspace: The Role of Chatting in the Development of Grammatical Competence. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.) Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 59-86). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationPicciano, A. G. (2002). Blended Learning Implication for Growth and Access. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10, 3.
dc.identifier.citationPopovici, D (2012). The Role of Reflection in Online Learning. Sunday, January 29, 2012. Retrieved from: http://poppins-upsydaisy.blogspot.com/2012/01/role-ofreflection-in-online-learning.html
dc.identifier.citationRajesh, R (2009). Cognitive Development in English Language Teaching. Bangalore: Lulu Press Inc.
dc.identifier.citationRichardson, W. (2006). Blogs, Wikis, Podcasts, and Other Powerful Web Tools for Classrooms. London: Corwin Press.
dc.identifier.citationRitchie, J. and Spencer, E. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis for Applied Policy Research. In, Bryman, A. and Burgess, R.G. (eds.) Analyzing Qualitative Data. (pp. 25-47). London: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citationRourke, L., T. Anderson, D. R. Garrison & W, Archer. (2001). Assessing Social Presence in Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2).
dc.identifier.citationRovai, A.P. (2002). A preliminary Look at Structural Differences in Sense of Classroom Community between Higher Educational Traditional and ALN Courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 6, 1-13
dc.identifier.citationRussell, A. Cohen, L. (1997). The Reflective Colleague in E-mail Cyberspace: A Means for Improving University Instruction. Computers & Education, 29(4), 137–145.
dc.identifier.citationRussell, G. M., and Kelly, N. H. (2002). Research as Interacting Dialogic Processes: Implications for Reflectivity. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 3(3). Retrieved from http://www.qualitativeresearch.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/831/1807
dc.identifier.citationSiemens, G. (2002). Interaction. E-Learning Course. October 8, 2002. Retrieved august 7, 2014, from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/Interaction.htm
dc.identifier.citationSkinner, B., and Austin, R. (1999). Computer conferencing: Does it Motivate EFL Students. ELT Journal, 53 (4), 270-279.
dc.identifier.citationSo, J. and Brush, T. A. (2008). Student Perceptions of Collaborative Learning, Social Presence and Satisfaction in a Blended Learning Environment: Relationships and Critical Factors. Computers & Education, Vol 51, 318-336.
dc.identifier.citationSpector, J, Merril, M, Merrienboer; J and Driscoll, M. (2008). Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. New York: Taylor and Francis
dc.identifier.citationVigotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between Learning and Development. From Mind and Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
dc.identifier.citationWallace, M. (1996). Action Research for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationWarschauer, M., and Meskill, C. (2000). Technology and Second Language Learning. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
dc.identifier.citationWaste, J.A and Waste, M.L. (2008). Using Wikis for Online Collaboration: The Power of the Read-Write Web. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/11726
dc.description71 Páginas.
dc.description.abstractTechnology is dramatically changing the way students are educated. Currently, virtual worlds offer engaging and stimulating spaces where students can meet online for regular classes. Institutions willing to incorporate technology in educational settings face the challenge of integrating tools that improve learning environments no matter who or where the students are. Technology allows users to carry out tasks that could be difficult in the real world due to constraints, such as cost, scheduling or location. The activities students engage online include live sessions, rich media presentations, and web-based workshops, emailing and chatting. In Colombia, many institutions are working towards offering suitable environments for online instruction. For instance, to respond to its main goals of strengthening the human capital in the country, contributing to the development of professionals of different areas of knowledge and offering better access and more job opportunities, the National Training Service (SENA), a national institution that offers tertiary education, has incorporated the Blackboard Collaborate platform to offer online courses including those for foreign languages. Regrettably, a survey completed by twelve English as a Foreign language students showed that in terms of online language learning there is a gap between what students learn, and how they practice and receive feedback using the virtual tools in the platform. Students manifested in the diagnostic survey that they do not take full advantage of online tools. Teachers use the components of the platform to administer schedules, grades, and technical support while students develop some tasks via some online tools like forums, wikis and/or blogs. Students have asynchronous interaction with their peers by posting answers to tasks or asking questions via technical forums. The result is SENA English language studenes_CO
dc.language.isoeng_USes_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.titleIncorporating the cognitive apprenticeship model to enhance online collaborative learning with chat tooles_CO
dc.typemasterThesis
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigido
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjeras
dc.identifier.local259728
dc.identifier.localTE06783
dc.type.localTesis de maestría
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigido


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem