Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.advisorBogoya, Alethia
dc.contributor.authorOrtiz Alvaran, Veronica
dc.contributor.authorMéndez, Elsa Patricia
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Hernández, Edwin
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-16T21:24:50Z
dc.date.available2014-07-16T21:24:50Z
dc.date.created2014
dc.date.issued2014-07-16
dc.identifier.citationAbdullah, M. H. (2001). Self-directed learning. Bloomington, IN: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading, English, and Communication. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED459458).
dc.identifier.citationAlderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
dc.identifier.citationAnderson, N. J. (2002). “The role of metacognition in L2 teaching and learning,” ERIC Digest. Retrieved December 6, 2013 from http://www/-ericdigests.org/
dc.identifier.citationAtehortua, J. (2010). Cognitive Styles: an Approach to Autonomous Learning in l2 Adult Students . Revista Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Vol. 4 No. 8 page 11.
dc.identifier.citationBenson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Harlow: Longman/ Pearson Education.
dc.identifier.citationBest, J.W. and Kahn J.V. (2006). Research in education. United state of America: Pearson.
dc.identifier.citationBiehler, R. and Snowman, J. (1993). Psychology Applied to Teaching. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
dc.identifier.citationBonds, C., Grant Bonds, L., and Peach, W. (1992). Metacognition: Developing independence in learning. Clearing House, 66(1), 56-59.
dc.identifier.citationBoud, D. (1998) Moving towards autonomy in Boud. D. ed. Developing student autonomy in learning. 2 nd edition. London: Kogan
dc.identifier.citationBrophy, J. (1986, October). On motivating students. East Lansing, Michigan: Institute for Research on Teaching, Michigan State University, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED276724).
dc.identifier.citationBrown, J.D. (2001). Using surveys in language programs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationBrysman, A. & Burgues, R. (1999). Qualitative research. In Hollstein, B. (n.d.). Qualitative approaches. Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis. London, New Delhi. Vol. 4.
dc.identifier.citationCain, K., Oakhill, J. V., & Bryant, P. E. (2000). Investigating the causes of Reading comprehension failure: The comprehension-age match design. Reading and Writing.
dc.identifier.citationCaravalho, S. & White, H. (1997). Combining the Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches to Poverty Measurements and Analysis. The practice and the Potential. Washington: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development
dc.identifier.citationCreswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
dc.identifier.citationCreswell, J. W. & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124-131.
dc.identifier.citationÇubukÇu, F. (2008). How to Enhance Reading Comprehension through Metacognitive Strategies.
dc.identifier.citationDay, R., and J. (1998). Bamford. Extensive reading in the second language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationDenzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
dc.identifier.citationDevine, J. (1993). The role of metacognition in second language reading and writing. In J. Carson and I. Leki (Eds.), Reading in the Composition Classroom: Second Language Perspectives (pp. 105-127). Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
dc.identifier.citationDörney, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press
dc.identifier.citationEggen, P. and Kaucbak, D. (1995). Strategies for Teachers: Teaching Content and Thinking Skills. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
dc.identifier.citationFreeman, D. (1998). Doing teaching research: From inquiry to understanding. Canada: Heinle and Heinle publishers.
dc.identifier.citationFung, I. Y. Y., Wilkinson, I. A. G., & Moore, D. W. (2003). L1-assisted reciprocal teaching to improve ESL students‟ comprehension of English expository text. Learning and Instruction, 13, 1-31.
dc.identifier.citationGarb, E. (2000). Maximing the potential of young adults with visual impairments: The metacognitive element. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 94 (9), 574 – 583.
dc.identifier.citationGough, P.B., & Hillinger, M.L. (1980). Learning to read: An unnatural act. Bulletin of the Orton Society
dc.identifier.citationGriffiths, C. (2008). Strategies and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed). Lessons from good language learners (pp. 83-98). Cambridge: Cambridge
dc.identifier.citationGuba, E. & Lincoln, Y. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. United States of America: SAGE publications.
dc.identifier.citationHarvey, S. & Goudvis, A. (2000). Strategies that work. Portland, Maine: Stenhouse Publishers.
dc.identifier.citationHammond, M and Collins, R. (1991). Self-Directed Learning: Critical Practice. London: Kogan.
dc.identifier.citationJanopoulos, M. (1986). The relationship of pleasure reading and second language writing proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 20 (4).
dc.identifier.citationJones, W.P. & Kottler, J.A. (2006). Understanding research: Becoming a competent and critical consumer. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson
dc.identifier.citationJoppe, M. (2000). The Research Process. Retrieved February 25, 2014, from http://www.ryerson.ca/~mjoppe/rp.htm
dc.identifier.citationKenning, M-M. (1996). Creating an infrastructure for autonomous learning: The resource center. System, 24, 223-231
dc.identifier.citationKrashen, S. (1993). The power of reading. Insights from the research. Englewood, Co.: Libraries Unlimited
dc.identifier.citationLepper, M.R. (1998). Motivational considerations in the study of instruction. Cognition and instruction, 5 (4), 289 – 309.
dc.identifier.citationLonergan, J. (1994). Self-access language centers: Implications for managers, teachers and learners. In E. Esch (Ed.) Self-access and the adult language learner (pp. 119 – 125). London: CILT
dc.identifier.citationLopez, A.& Giraldo, M. (2011). The English Reading Strategies of Two Colombian English Pre-service Teachers Íkala, revista de lenguaje y cultura, vol. 16, núm. 28, , pp
dc.identifier.citation45-76. Universidad de Antioquia. Colombia Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate? Educational Researcher, 17(2), 13-19.
dc.identifier.citationMcNamara, D. S. (2004). SERT: Self-explanation Reading Training. Discourse Processes, 38, 1– 30
dc.identifier.citationMertler, C. (2009). Action Research.Teachers as researchers in the classroom.SAGE Publications. Inc
dc.identifier.citationMishler, E. (1990). Validation in inquiry-guided research: The role of exemplars in narrative.
dc.identifier.citationMoore, C. (1992). Self-access : Appropriate technology. Manchester: British Council.
dc.identifier.citationO’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., & Russo, R. (1985). Learning strategies used by beginning and intermediate ESL students. Language Learning, 35, 21-46
dc.identifier.citationO’Malley, J. M., Russo, R. P., Chamot, A. U., & Stewner-Manzanares, G. (1998). Applications of learning strategies by students learning English as a second language.
dc.identifier.citationIn C. E. Weinstein, E. T. Goetz, & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment instruction and evaluation (pp. 215-231). San Diego: Academic Press.
dc.identifier.citationOxford, R. (1992). Research on Second Language Learning Strategies. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, pp 174-187. doi:10.1017/S0267190500002452.
dc.identifier.citationPatton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
dc.identifier.citationPearson, J. (1998). 'Teaching terminology using electronic resources' in S. Botley, A. McEnery and A. Wilson (eds.) Multilingual Corpora in Teaching and Research. Amsterdam: Rodopi
dc.identifier.citationPeirce, W. (2003). Metacognition: Study strategies, monitoring, and motivation. Retrieved February 14, 2014, from http://academic.pg.cc.md.us/~wpeirce/MCCCTR/met acognition.htm
dc.identifier.citationPiano, C. (2010). The adoption and practice of mixed methods: U.S. trends in federally funded health related research. Qualitative inquiry, 6 (6), 428 – 440
dc.identifier.citationQuiroga, C. (2010). Promoting tenth Graders' Reading Comprehension of Academic Texts in the English Class. PROFILE, 12 (2), 11 – 32. Retrieved from: http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/prf/v12n2/v12n2a02.pdf
dc.identifier.citationRoberts, L. W., Geppert, C. M., Coverdale, J., Louie, A., & Edenharder, K. (2005). Ethical and regulatory considerations in educational research. Acad. Psychiatry
dc.identifier.citationSalataci, R., & Akyel, A. (2002). Possible effects of strategy instruction on L1 and L2 reading. Reading in a Foreign Language 14(1), 1-17.
dc.identifier.citationSale, C. (1999). The Quality of Qualitative Research. Introducing Qualitative Methods. Great Britain: SAGE publications Ltd.
dc.identifier.citationSamad, A. A. (2011). Structure to Facilitate Reading Comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 64: 368- 372. doi: 10.1598/RT.64.5. How to Teach Expository Text
dc.identifier.citationSmith, F. (1971). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
dc.identifier.citationStrauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
dc.identifier.citationTsang, W. (1996). Comparing the effects of reading and writing on writing performance. Applied Linguistics.
dc.identifier.citationTudor, I. and F. Hafiz. (1989). Extensive reading as a means of input to L2 learning. Journal of Research in Reading.12 (2)
dc.identifier.citationVygostsky, L. (1978). Interaction Between Learning and Development. From Mind and Society (pp. 79 – 91) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
dc.identifier.citationWren, S. (2002). Ten myths of reading intruction. SEDL. Letter
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/11209
dc.description95 páginas.
dc.description.abstractThe goals of this study were achieved, the quantitative and qualitative data results, promoting the metacognitive strategies help the target students become self-directed learners, allowed them be aware of metacognitive reading strategies they should use based on their reading needs; despite all the differences of the three contexts regarding students’ age, language level, and academic situations; this was one of the common positive results after carrying out this work. The subjects also showed important improvements related to their attitudes towards their own second language learning process. The analysis of the results that were obtained by the students in the three different contexts before, during and after applying the metacognitive strategies on this project, allowed the researchers confirmed that they improved their reading comprehension proficiency. Information found in the teachers’ journals described that a remarkable majority of learners in the three contexts went through processes involving features which are linked to autonomous learning.es_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.subjectComprensión de lectura -- Inglés -- Enseñanza -- Colombia
dc.subjectInglés básico -- Comprensión de lectura
dc.subjectLenguaje y lenguas -- Inglés -- Enseñanza
dc.titleImproving reading comprehension through metacognitive self-directed reading strategieses_CO
dc.typemasterThesis
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigido
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjeras.
dc.identifier.local259568
dc.identifier.localTE06646
dc.type.localTesis de maestría
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigido


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem