Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.advisorBeatty, Ken
dc.contributor.authorGómez de Ortíz, Diana María
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-19T13:47:35Z
dc.date.available2014-05-19T13:47:35Z
dc.date.created2014
dc.date.issued2014-05-19
dc.identifier.citationBoekaerts, M., Pintrich, P & Zeidner, M. (2005). Handbook of self-regulation. California, San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press.
dc.identifier.citationBoud, D. (1991). Implementing students’ self-assessment. Campbeltown: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australia.
dc.identifier.citationBraslavsky, C. (2004). Challenges of curricular reforms in the light of the mandate for social cohesion. In: Reforma Curricular y Cohesión Social en América Latina, Informe Final del Seminario Internacional. San Jose´ de Costa Rica OIE-UNESCO Centro-América.
dc.identifier.citationBrown, H. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. New York, NY: Pearson.
dc.identifier.citationBurns, A. (2003). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge: CUP.
dc.identifier.citationChamot, A. (1987). The learning strategies of ESL students’, In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.). Learner Strategies in Language Learning. Cambridge: Prentice-Hall. 71-84
dc.identifier.citationChamor, A.,Barnhard, S., El-Dinary, P., & Robbins, J. (1999). The learning strategies handbook. New York, NY: Pearson Education
dc.identifier.citationCheng, W. & Warren, M. (2005). Peer-assessment of language proficiency. Language Testing. Hong Kong: Edward Arnold publishers.
dc.identifier.citationChomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
dc.identifier.citationCohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. New York, NY: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citationCorder, S.P. (1981). Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationDörnyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration and processing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
dc.identifier.citationEllis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA Perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40 (1).
dc.identifier.citationEllis, R. (1999) Learning a second language through interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
dc.identifier.citationGardner, D. (2000). Self-Assessment for Autonomous Language Learners. Links and Letters, 7, 49-60.
dc.identifier.citationGibbs, G. (1981). Teaching students to learn – a student-centered approach. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
dc.identifier.citationGeeslin, K. L. (2003). Student self-assessment in the foreign language classroom: The place of authentic assessment instruments in the Spanish language classroom. Hispania, 86(4), 857-868.
dc.identifier.citationGreen, P., & Hecht, K. (1992). Implicit and explicit grammar: an empirical study. Applied Linguistics, 13, 168–184.
dc.identifier.citationGu, Y. (2010) Advance review: A new book on teaching and researching language learning strategies. Wellington, New Zealand: Wellington University.
dc.identifier.citationHadfield, J. (1992). Classroom Dynamics. Oxford: Oxford University Press
dc.identifier.citationHedge, T., (2000) Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citationHuang, (2008). International review of applied linguistics in language teaching. IRAL, 46 (4), 375-392.
dc.identifier.citationInternational Baccalaureate Organization. (2011) Diploma programme language B guide. Cardiff, Wales: Peterson House.
dc.identifier.citationInternational Baccalaureate Organization (2012). About the International Baccalaureate. Retrieved from: http://www.ibo.org/general/who.cfm
dc.identifier.citationKrashen, S. (1982) Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Retrieved from http://www.sdkrashen.com/Principles_and_Practice/index.html
dc.identifier.citationKohonen, V. (1991). Foreign Language Learning as Learner Education: Facilitating SelfDirection in Language Learning. Transparency and Coherence in Language Learning in Europe. Zurich: Council for Cultural Co-operation
dc.identifier.citationKovac, M. M., & Sirkovic, N. (2012). Peer evaluation of oral presentations in Croatia. English Language Teaching, 5(7), 8-16. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1027548730?accountid=45375
dc.identifier.citationMi-mi,L.(2009).Adoptingvaried feedbackmodesin theEFLwritingclass. US-China Foreign Language 7 (1), 60-63.
dc.identifier.citationMcNiff, J. & Whitehead, J (2006). All You Need to Know About Action Research. London: Sage.
dc.identifier.citationMinisterio de Educacion Nacional. (2005). Programa nacional de bilinguismo. Bogota: Ministerio de Educacion Nacional. Retrieved from http://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1621/articles- 132560_recurso_pdf_programa_nacional_bilinguismo.pdf
dc.identifier.citationMirjana, M. K., & Sirkovic, N. (2012). Peer evaluation of oral presentations in Croatia. English Language Teaching, 5(7), 8-16. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1027548730?accountid=45375
dc.identifier.citationNakamura, Y. (2002). Teacher assessment and peer-assessment in practice. Educational Studies, 44, 203-215.
dc.identifier.citationNunan, D. (1997). Designing and adapting materials to encourage learner autonomy. In P. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 192-203). Harlow: Addison Wesley, Longman Limited.
dc.identifier.citationOjeda, J., (2011). The use of voice message boards to improve accuracy in the simple past tense through awareness raising in A2 learners. (Master’s Thesis). From Intellectum Database: http://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co:8080/jspui/bitstream/10818/1730/1/Jorge%20H umberto%20Ojeda%20Merchan.pdf
dc.identifier.citationOxford, R. (1989) Use of language learning strategies: a synthesis of studies with implications for teacher training. System 17:237-47
dc.identifier.citationOxford, R. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. London: Pearson
dc.identifier.citationPeng, J. F. (2009). Peer-assessment of oral presentation in an EFL context. Indiana University. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (AAT 304902644)
dc.identifier.citationScarcella, R., & Oxford, R. (1992). The tapestry of language learning: the individual in the communicative classroom. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
dc.identifier.citationScharle, A . & A. Szabo (2000). Learner autonomy: A guide to developing learner responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationSivan, A. (2000). The implementation of peer-assessment: An action research approach. Assessment in Education, 7(2), 193-213. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/204052940?accountid=45375
dc.identifier.citationShank, G., (2002) Qualitative Research A personal Skills Approach. Ohio, Columbus. Merril Prentice Hall: Ohio
dc.identifier.citationSchon, D.A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.
dc.identifier.citationSchunk, D. & Zimmerman, B. (2008). Motivation and self regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
dc.identifier.citationSpies, K., (2012). The role of peer feedback in oral communicative tasks for Young adult learners. (Master’s Thesis). Retrieved from Intellectum Database: http://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co:8080/jspui/bitstream/10818/3347/1/Kai_Leande r_Spies.pdf
dc.identifier.citationSpratt, M., Humphreys, G., & Chan, V. (2002). Autonomy and motivation: which comes first?. Language Teaching Research, 6, 245-266
dc.identifier.citationStrauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications
dc.identifier.citationStrosinski, J. (2003). Feedback, Self-assessment and Goal-setting. Retrieved from: http://constructivechoices.com/articles_workshops.htm
dc.identifier.citationSwain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Gass, S & Madden, C (Eds.). Input in Second language acquisition (pp.235-256). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House Publishers.
dc.identifier.citationTamjid, N., & Birjandi, P. (2011). Fostering learner autonomy through self- and peerassessment. International Journal of Academic Research, 3(5), 245-251
dc.identifier.citationTakallou, F., (2011). The effect of metacognitive strategy instruction on EFL learners’ reading comprehension performance and metacognitive awareness. Asian EFL Journal, 13(1), 272-300.
dc.identifier.citationTorkamani, H. (2010). On the use of metacognitive strategies by Iranian EFL learners in doing various reading tasks across different proficiency levels. International Journal of Language Studies. 4 (1), 47-58
dc.identifier.citationUr, P. (1991). A course in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citationWilley, K., & Gardner, A. (2010). Investigating the capacity of self and peer-assessment activities to engage students and promote learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(4), 429-433.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/10718
dc.description88 Páginas.
dc.description.abstractThis qualitative action research study investigated the impact of peer- and self-assessment strategies on enhancement of oral competence. The 17 participants were semi-fluent B2 (CEFR) speakers of English. However, at the beginning of the study, they communicated only through relatively basic grammar structures. This research study was framed upon the belief that one of the abilities underlying speaking proficiency is grammatical competence, which consists of grammar, vocabulary and pronunciation (Oxford, 1989). Similarly, Gu (2010) believes that Learners supported by learning strategies can maximize their outcome and, therefore, improve their oral production. Peer-assessment contributes to the development of self-directed learners (Boud, 1991), and provides more tools for selfevaluation (Cheng & Warren, 2005). Additionally, self-assessment improves learner motivation, reduces frustration, increases productivity and autonomy, and leads to higher retention. The study showed that these two self-monitoring strategies have a positive impact on the participants’ oral competence. The learners became more aware of their use of tenses as they were able to identify their own mistakes, provide feedback to their peers and reflect on the value of peer and self-assessment. Additionally, they became more autonomous as to set new action plans in order to improve their use of perfect tenses. Key words: self-assessment, peer-assessment, oral competence, self-monitoring, selfdirected learners.es_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.subjectInglés básico -- Enseñanza
dc.subjectInglés comercial -- Enseñanza
dc.subjectVerbo (Gramática) -- Inglés básico -- Colombia
dc.titleThe Impact of Peer and Self-assessment on Teenage B2 Students´ Use of Present Perfect Simple, Present Perfect Continuous and Past Perfect Simple in their Spontaneous Spoken Productiones_CO
dc.typemasterThesis
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomo
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjeras
dc.identifier.local259359
dc.identifier.localTE06491
dc.type.localTesis de maestría
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomo


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem