@misc{10818/58212,
year = {2022},
url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10818/58212},
abstract = {Purpose: The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), an evaluation instrument, requires a validation process to guarantee the measurement of skills related to clinical reasoning. The OSCE is relevant for decision-making during the formation process for professional practice, so the purpose of this study is to determine the content validity and inter-rater reliability of an OSCE, during a physiotherapy undergraduate program for clinical reasoning. 
Methods: Instrumental design, which identified content validity through internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha), added to recognition of the inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient). 
Results: The instrument demonstrated good internal consistency (0.98) and its concordance is from a substantial to an almost perfect degree of agreement.
Conclusion: The OSCE proved to be a suitable instrument to assess the clinical reasoning skill of physiotherapy students; nevertheless, this validation process has limitations in the number of stations and the little application in physiotherapy.},
publisher = {Turkish Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation},
title = {Validity and Reliability of an “Osce” For Clinical Reasoning in Physiotherapy},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.839006},
author = {Cobo-mejía, E. A. and Sandoval, C. and Villarraga, A. and Alfonso, M. and Catellanos, A. and Acosta, M. and Rondón, Y. and Goyeneche, R. and Catellanos, R.},
}