Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSanabria Quiroga, Álvaro Enrique
dc.contributor.advisorVega Peña, Neil Valentin
dc.contributor.advisorDomínguez Torres, Luis Carlos
dc.contributor.advisorOsorio Baker, Camilo
dc.contributor.authorMora Vanegas, Mónica del Pilar
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-30T16:29:21Z
dc.date.available2013-07-30T16:29:21Z
dc.date.created2013
dc.date.issued2013-07-30
dc.identifier.citationBoermeester E N, M A Ramrattan, S M Smorenburg, D J Gouma and M A The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review Qual. Saf. Health Care 2008;17;216-223
dc.identifier.citationGawande Atul et al. WHO Guidelines for Safe Surgery. Wold Alliance for Patient Safety. First Edition – 2008. Safe surgery – Save lives. Disponible en www.who.int/patientsafety/safesurgery/en/ Consultado el 26 de Julio de 2008
dc.identifier.citationWeiser T, Regenbogen S E, Thompson K, Haynes A B, et al. An estimation of the global volume of surgery. Lancet ,2008, 372: 139 – 144
dc.identifier.citationKable AK, Gibberd RW, Spigelman AD. Adverse events in surgical patients in Australia. International Journal of Quality in Health Care, 2002, 14:269–76.
dc.identifier.citationYii MK, Ng KJ. Risk-adjusted surgical audit with the POSSUM scoring system in a developing country. British Journal of Surgery, 2002, 89:110–3.
dc.identifier.citationBrennan TA, Leap LL, Laird NM et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med, 1991;324: 377-384
dc.identifier.citationVenn EJ, Steenbruggen J, Roukema Classifying Surgical complications A Critical Appraisal Arch Surg. 2005;140:1078-1083
dc.identifier.citationBhattacharyya N,Fried M. Assesment of the morbility and complications of Total Thyroidectomy Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002, 128:389 - 392
dc.identifier.citationLaw S, MBBChir, Wong KH et al, Predictive Factors for Postoperative Pulmonary Complications and Mortality After Esophagectomy for Cancer. Ann Surg 2004;240: 791–800
dc.identifier.citationDiaz de Liaño A., Yarnoz C, Aguilar R, Artieda C, Rationale for gastrectomy with D2 Lymphadenectomy in the treatment of gastric cancer . Gastric Cancer (2008) 11: 96–102
dc.identifier.citationDimick JB, Cowan JA, Ailanadi G et al. National Variation in Operative Mortality rates for Esophagueal resection and the Need for Quality Improvement. Arch Surg 2003, 138: 1305-1309
dc.identifier.citationHealey MA, Shackford SR, Osler TM, Rogers FB, Burns E. Complications in surgical patients. Arch Surg. 2002;137:611-618
dc.identifier.citationGaitan H, Eslava JS, Rodriguez N et al. Incidencia y Evitabilidad de Eventos Adversos en Pacientes Hospitalizados en tres Instituciones Hospitalarias en Colombia, 2006. Rev Salud Publica 2008, 10 (2):215-226
dc.identifier.citationDindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of Surgical Complications A New Proposal With Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey .Ann Surg 2004;240: 205–213
dc.identifier.citationBirkmeyer JD, Birkmeyer NJ, Dimick JB. Measuring the quality of surgical care: structure, process, or outcomes? J Am Coll Surg. 2004; 198:626
dc.identifier.citationKievit J, Marang–van de Mheen PJ. The National Surgical Adverse Event Registration: A Study Protocol by the Association of Surgery of the Netherlands. Protocol version 3.5. Utrecht: Association of Surgeons of the Netherlands; 1995.
dc.identifier.citationThomas EJ, Stussent DM, Burstin HR et al. Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado. Med care 2000; 38:261-271.
dc.identifier.citationReportable Events Guidelines. Ministry of Health New Zeland. Disponible en: http://www.moh.govt.nz/moh.nsf/0/DDFCEFCD693AEBC4CC256AD0007F41BB Consultado 25 de Julio de 2008
dc.identifier.citationClavien P-A, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM. Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1992; 111:518-526.
dc.identifier.citationFeldman L, Barkun J, Barkun A, et al. Measuring postoperative complications in general surgery patients using an outcomes-based strategy: comparison with complications presented at morbidity and mortality rounds. Surgery. 1997; 122:711–719; discussion 719–720
dc.identifier.citationTargarona EM, Espert JJ, Bombuy E, et al. Complications of laparoscopic splenectomy. Arch Surg. 2000;135:1137–1140.
dc.identifier.citationGhobrial RM, Saab S, Lassman C, et al. Donor and recipient outcomes in right lobe adult living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2002;8:901–909
dc.identifier.citationDaley J, Henderson W, Khuri S. Risk-adjusted surgical outcomes. Annu Rev Med. 2001;52:275–287
dc.identifier.citationBirkmeyer NJ, Birkmeyer JD. Strategies for improving surgical quality—should payers reward excellence or effort? N Engl J Med (2006) 354:864–70
dc.identifier.citationMichel P, Quenon JL, Sarasqueta AM Comparison of three methods for estimating rates of adverse events and rates of preventable adverse events in acute care hospitals. BMJ 2004;328;199
dc.identifier.citationC Brown C, T Hofer T, A Johal A, R Thomson R et al. An epistemology of patient safety research: a framework for study design and interpretation.Part 3. End points and measurement Qual. Saf. Health Care 2008; 17; 170-177.
dc.identifier.citationMinisterio de la Proteccion Social. Resolución N 1446 de 08 de mayo de 2006. “Por la cual se define el sistema de información para la calidad y se adoptan los Indicadores de Monitoria del Sistema Obligatorio de Garantía de Calidad en la Atención en Salud”
dc.identifier.citationDatos obtenidos en el Registro de Cirugìas de la Oficina de Anestesia, de la Clínica Universitaria de Teletòn, durante el periodo de enero a Julio de 2008.
dc.identifier.citationHaynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, et al. A Surgical Safety Checklist to reduce Morbidity and Mortality in a Global Population. N Engl JMed. 2009; 360: 491-499
dc.identifier.citationwww.msc.es/organizacion/sns/.../docs/INFORME_IBEAS.pdf
dc.identifier.citationwww.unisinucartagena.edu.co/ObservatorioS/doc/La/Seguridad/del/Paciente/y/la/Atencion/Segura.p df
dc.identifier.citationDindo D, Clavien P. What Is A Surgical Complication?. World J Surg. 2008; 32: 939-941
dc.identifier.citationClavien P, Barkun J, Olivieira M, et al. The Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications. Ann Surg. 2009; 250: 187-196.
dc.identifier.citationSokol DK, Wilson J. What is A Surgical Complication?. World j Surg. 2008; 32: 942-944
dc.identifier.citationMainz J. Defining and classifying clinical indicators for quality improvement. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2003; Vol. 15, (6): 523–530
dc.identifier.citationPerisadinis C, Herberger B, Papadogeorgakis N, et al. Complications After Free Flap Surgery: Do We Need Standarized Classification of Surgical Complication?. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 50: 113-118.
dc.identifier.citationCasdei R, Ricci C, Pezzilli R, et al. Assessment of Complications According to the Clavien-Dindo Classification After Distal Pancreatectomy. J Pancreas. 2011; 12(2): 126-130.
dc.identifier.citationSink E, Leunig M, Zattz I, et al. Reliability of a Complication Classification System for Orthopedic Surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012; 470: 2220-2226.
dc.identifier.citationSlankamenac K, Graf R, Puhan M, et al. Perception of Surgical Complications Among Patients, Nurses and Physicians: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Survey. Patient Saf Surg. 2011; 5:30
dc.identifier.citationWoodfield J, Pettigrew R, Plank L, et al. Accuracy of the Surgeon´s Clinical Prediction of Perioperative Complications Using a Visual Analog Scale. World J Surg. 2007; 31: 1912-1920.
dc.identifier.citationClavien P, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM. Proposed Classification of Complications of Surgery With Examples of Utility in Cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1992; 111(5): 518-26.
dc.identifier.citationhttp://www.fisterra.com/mbe/investiga/kappa/kappa2.pdf
dc.identifier.citationMurtaza B, Saeed S, Sharif MA. Postoperative complications in emergency versus elective laparotomies at a peripheral hospital. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2010; 22(3): 42-7.
dc.identifier.citationSoergel P, Jensen T, Moakowski L, et al. Characterization of the learning curve of caesarean section. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012; 286: 29-33.
dc.identifier.citationFernández R, Tartas A, Jiménez F.J, et al. Curva de aprendizaje en la técnica de Stoppa. Cir Esp 2002; 72(3): 152-6
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/8172
dc.description44 Páginas.
dc.description.abstractSe pretende medir las complicaciones quirúrgicas en un Hospital de nivel III, de acuerdo con la Escala de La Universidad de Zúrich, que las clasifica según el manejo. Es importante conocer, definir y unificar que es y cómo se clasifican las complicaciones. Con los resultados se espera llenar el vacío de información acerca de la definición y clasificación de una complicación. Se encontró que la incidencia de complicaciones fue de 14,9%, y el 80% fueron menores, las más frecuentes fueron el vomito, la anemia y la ISO. La validación de la concordancia interobservador, resulto en un coeficiente Kappa de 0,61. La escala puede ser aplicada de forma fácil, objetiviza las complicaciones y disminuye el subregistro de estas.es_CO
dc.language.isospaes_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de la Sabana
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.subjectCirugía-Complicaciones-Medicioneses_CO
dc.subjectCirugía-Complicaciones-Investigacioneses_CO
dc.titleMedición de las complicaciones quirúrgicas en un hospital de tercer nivel: un enfoque asistencial. Estudio observacional descriptivoes_CO
dc.typebachelorThesis
dc.publisher.programEspecialización en Cirugía General
dc.publisher.departmentFacultad de Medicina
dc.identifier.local254663
dc.identifier.localTE05953
dc.type.spaTesis de especialización
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_CO
dc.creator.degreeEspecialista en Cirugía General.


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record