@misc{10818/61892,
year = {2024},
url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10818/61892},
abstract = {To reach high performance with deep learning, hyperparameter optimization (HPO) is essential. This process is usually time-consuming due to costly evaluations of neural networks. Early discarding techniques limit the resources granted to unpromising candidates by observing the empirical learning curves and canceling neural network training as soon as the lack of competitiveness of a candidate becomes evident. Despite two decades of research, little is understood about the trade-off between the aggressiveness of discarding and the loss of predictive performance. Our paper studies this trade-off for several commonly used discarding techniques such as successive halving and learning curve extrapolation. Our surprising finding is that these commonly used techniques offer minimal to no added value compared to the simple strategy of discarding after a constant number of epochs of training. The chosen number of epochs mostly depends on the available compute budget. We call this approach i-Epoch (i being the constant number of epochs with which neural networks are trained) and suggest to assess the quality of early discarding techniques by comparing how their Pareto-Front (in consumed training epochs and predictive performance) complement the Pareto-Front of i-Epoch. © 2024 The Author(s)},
publisher = {Neurocomputing},
title = {The unreasonable effectiveness of early discarding after one epoch in neural network hyperparameter optimization},
doi = {10.1016/j.neucom.2024.127964},
author = {Egele R and Mohr F and Viering T and Balaprakash P.},
}