@misc{10818/35836,
year = {2018},
url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10818/35836},
abstract = {This study compares U.S. digital news coverage of recent foreign and domestic_x000D_
protests. Differences in coverage’s framing, sourcing, and device emphases were_x000D_
analyzed for two cases: protests that erupted after the death of Michael Brown and_x000D_
protests demanding justice for the 43 missing students from Ayotzinapa, Mexico._x000D_
Building on protest paradigm literature, content analysis results show that news_x000D_
articles that appeared on Facebook and Twitter emphasized legitimizing frames for_x000D_
foreign protests more than domestic protests. Foreign protests were framed with the_x000D_
spectacle frame more than domestic protests, which were more often portrayed as_x000D_
confrontational. Digitally native news organizations produced content that deviated_x000D_
from expected paradigmatic norms the most. In addition, this research examines the_x000D_
relationship between content and sharing on Facebook and Twitter. Implications of_x000D_
these findings within the theoretical framework of the protest paradigm are_x000D_
discussed.},
publisher = {Mass Communication and Society},
title = {From #Ferguson to #Ayotzinapa: Analyzing differences in domestic and foreign protest news shared on social media},
doi = {10.1080/15205436.2018.1469773},
author = {Kilgo, Danielle K. and Harlow, Summer and García Perdomo, Víctor Manuel and Salaverría, Ramón},
}