@article{10818/13381,
year = {2002},
url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10818/13381},
abstract = {This paper analyses a sentence of Constitutional Court pronouncing as unattainable a rule considered unconstitutional and as an infringement of various articles of CPN. Author refers to Aristotle to explain how particular justice splits in two: distributive justice and corrective justice, this last one labeled by Saint Thomas as commutative. Topic is examined by appealing to this justice principie, and presenting a particular case contents explain terms such as legal development, compensation, incentive, proportionality, stimulus, and some others to approach concern on distributive justice and proportional equity.},
abstract = {Esta nota nos analiza una sentencia de la Corte Constitucional por la cual se declaró inexequible una norma por considerarla inconstitucional y violatoria de diferentes artículos de la CPN. La autora apela a Aristóteles para explicar nos cómo la justicia particular se divide en dos: justicia distributiva y justicia correctiva, a esta última Santo Tomás la denominó conmutativa. Con este principio de justicia y tomando como base un caso en particular, se desarrolla este tema, que explica diferentes términos como: desarrollo legal, compensación, incentivo, proporcionalidad, estímulo, etc., para llegar a lo que nos atañe con respecto a la justicia distributiva e igualdad proporcional.},
keywords = {Justicia universal},
keywords = {Justicia particular},
keywords = {Justicia distributiva},
keywords = {Justicia correctiva},
keywords = {Dignidad},
title = {Lo justo distributivo: consideraciones sobre un caso en concreto},
author = {Forero Forero, Claudia Helena},
}