Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.advisorCuesta Medina, Liliana Marcela
dc.contributor.authorMolina Castro, Juan Carlos Andrés
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-02T16:36:16Z
dc.date.available2021-03-02T16:36:16Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-10
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/47077
dc.description39 páginases_CO
dc.description.abstractSelf-efficacy refers to the person’s belief about his or her own capacity to perform the required behaviors to produce specific and desired outcomes. In other words, self-efficacy is the individual’s judgment about his or her ability to succeed in a particular situation. The main focus of this research is to establish the relationship between tenth graders’ writing self-efficacy beliefs and their actual performance in writing in the English language class. Hence, this investigation studies the extent to which learners who initially indicated low levels of self-efficacy raised their writing self-efficacy beliefs after the implementation of four virtual lessons and four virtual tutorials. Results suggest that the increase in the students’ writing self-efficacy perceptions are the result of continuous learning, practice, and feedback which raised students’ confidence when writing. Nevertheless, the present research does not reveal a directly proportional relationship between writing self-efficacy and students’ performance in writing since those students who showed high levels of efficacy did not reflect it in the writing tasks carried out. This result was obtained after assessing the four tasks with a checklist that I created for each particular activity. In this way, the scores learners had in each production exercise were compared with their responses gotten in the writing self-efficacy scale that students answered before and after the implementation stage.eng
dc.description.abstractLa autoeficacia hace referencia a la creencia de la persona sobre su propia capacidad para realizar acciones necesarias para producir resultados específicos y deseados. En otras palabras, la autoeficacia es el juicio del individuo sobre su capacidad para tener éxito en una situación particular. El enfoque principal de esta investigación se enmarca en establecer la relación entre las creencias de autoeficacia en la escritura de los estudiantes de décimo grado y su desempeño real en la escritura en la clase de inglés. Por lo tanto, esta investigación analiza hasta qué punto los estudiantes que inicialmente indicaron bajos niveles de autoeficacia elevaban sus creencias de autoeficacia en la escritura después de la implementación de cuatro lecciones y cuatro tutorías virtuales. Los resultados sugieren que el aumento en las percepciones de autoeficacia de los estudiantes en la escritura es el resultado del aprendizaje, la práctica y la retroalimentación continuos, como factores que aumentaron la confianza de los estudiantes al escribir. Sin embargo, la presente investigación no revela una relación directamente proporcional entre la autoeficacia y el desempeño de los estudiantes en la escritura, ya que aquellos estudiantes que mostraron altos niveles de eficacia no lo reflejaron en las tareas de escritura realizadas. Este resultado se obtuvo después de evaluar las cuatro tareas con una lista de verificación que se creó para cada actividad en particular. De esta forma, se compararon los puntajes que obtuvieron los estudiantes en cada ejercicio de producción con sus respuestas obtenidas en la escala de autoeficacia escrita que los estudiantes respondieron antes y después de la etapa de implementación.spa
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabanaes_CO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleThe impact of self-efficacy beliefs in the writing performance of tenth graders in the english language classroomes_CO
dc.typemasterThesises_CO
dc.identifier.local280911
dc.identifier.localTE11178
dc.type.hasVersionpublishedVersiones_CO
dc.rights.accessRightsrestrictedAccesses_CO
dc.subject.armarcAutoeficaciaspa
dc.subject.armarcEscrituraspa
dc.subject.armarcAptitud pedagógicaspa
dc.subject.armarcAprendizajespa
dc.subject.armarcPlanificación educativaspa
dcterms.referencesAl-Jumaily, S. (2015). Improving my students’ writing skill: An intensive course for ESL learners by using process-approach to writing with the assistance of computer Word processor. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijelt.v2n1p29en
dcterms.referencesArjulayana, & Srikandi, C. N. (2018). Teaching and learning motivation in english mastery for early semester student of english department. Journal of Education and Counseling, 1(2), 89–103. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330519950_TEACHING_AND_LEARNING_M OTIVATION_IN_ENGLISH_MASTERY_FOR_EARLY_SEMESTER_STUDENT_OF_E NGLISH_DEPARTMENTen
dcterms.referencesBandura, A. (1986a). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.en
dcterms.referencesBandura, A. (1986b). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1521/JSCP.1986.4.3.359en
dcterms.referencesBandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71–81). Academic Press.en
dcterms.referencesBandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company.en
dcterms.referencesBruning, R., Dempsey, M., Kauffman, D. F., McKim, C., & Zumbrunn, S. (2013). Examining dimensions of self-efficacy for writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 25–38. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258111166_Examining_Dimensions_of_SelfEfficacy_for_Writingen
dcterms.referencesCarpendale, S., Knudsen, S., Thudt, A., & Hinrichs, U. (2017). Analyzing qualitative data. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces, 477–481.en
dcterms.referencesCharmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE. http://www.sxf.uevora.pt/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Charmaz_2006.pdfen
dcterms.referencesChilito Piamba, I. S. (2017). Una estrategia de interpretación, análisis y creación asociada al plan lector de la institución educativa José Eusabio Caro [Unpublished master's thesis]. Universidad del Cauca.en
dcterms.referencesCorbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basic of qualitive research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.en
dcterms.referencesCreswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE publications.en
dcterms.referencesCreswell, J. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson Education.en
dcterms.referencesCreswell, John. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (Forth). SAGE Publications. http://fe.unj.ac.id/wpcontent/uploads/2019/08/Research-Design_Qualitative-Quantitative-and-Mixed-MethodsApproaches.pdfen
dcterms.referencesFredricks, J. (2013). Behavioral engagement in learning. In J. Hattie & E. Anderman (Eds.), International guide to student achievement (pp. 42–44). Routledgeen
dcterms.referencesFredricks, J. A., & McColskey, W. (2012). The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments. In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 763–782). Springer.en
dcterms.referencesGist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183–211. https://www.wku.edu/cebs/doctorate/documents/readings/gist_mitchell_1992_selfefficacy_theoretical_analysis.pdfen
dcterms.referencesGöker, S. D. (2016). Use of reflective journals in development of teachers’ leadership and teaching skills. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(12A), 63–70. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313883003_Use_of_Reflective_Journals_in_Deve lopment_of_Teachers’_Leadership_and_Teaching_Skillsen
dcterms.referencesHashemnejad, F., Zoghi, M., & Amini, D. (2014). The relationship between self-efficacy and writing performance across genders. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 4(5), 1045– 1052. http://www.academypublication.com/issues/past/tpls/vol04/05/24.pdfen
dcterms.referencesHenao, J. A. L. (2017). The influence of ICT in the development of writing skills through an online platform. Matices En Lenguas Extranjeras, 11, 19–44. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330841627_The_Influence_of_ICT_in_the_Devel opment_of_Writing_Skills_through_an_Online_Platform_1en
dcterms.referencesJaved, M., Juan, W. X., & Nazli, S. (2013). A study of students’ assessment in writing skills of the english language. International Journal of Instruction, 6(2), 129–144. https://www.academia.edu/3775337/A_Study_of_Students_Assessment_in_Writing_Skills_ of_the_English_Languageen
dcterms.referencesKlimova, B. F. (2013). The importance of writing. Indian Journal of Research, 2(1), 9–11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274925223_The_Importance_of_Writing McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based Inquiry. Pearson.en
dcterms.referencesMeissner, H., Creswell, J., Klassen, A. C., Plano, V., & Smith, K. C. (2011). Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research. https://www.csun.edu/sites/default/files/best_prac_mixed_methods.pdfen
dcterms.referencesMorse, J. M. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40(2), 120–123. https://journals.lww.com/nursingresearchonline/Citation/1991/03000/Approaches_to_Qualit ative_Quantitative.14.aspxen
dcterms.referencesPajares, F., & Valiante, G. (1997). Influence of self-efficacy on elementary students’ writing. The Journal of Educational Research, 90(6), 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1997.10544593en
dcterms.referencesRahimpour, M., & Salimi, A. (2010). The impact of explicit instruction on foreign language learners’ performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1740–1746. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/50863571_The_impact_of_explicit_instruction_o n_foreign_language_learners’_performanceen
dcterms.referencesRankin, J. L., Bruning, R. H., & Timme, V. L. (1994). The development of beliefs about spelling and their relationship to spelling performance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8(3), 213– 232. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350080303en
dcterms.referencesRao, P. S. (2019). The significance of writing skills in ELL environment. ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 9(3), 5–17. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332188858_The_Significance_of_Writing_Skills_ in_ELL_Environmenten
dcterms.referencesRao, Z. (2007). Training in brainstorming and developing writing skills. ELT Journal, 61(2), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm002en
dcterms.referencesRaoofi, S., Tan, B. H., & Chan, S. H. (2012). Self-efficacy in second/foreign language learning contexts. English Language Teaching, 5(11), 6-–73.en
dcterms.referencesRiding, R., & Rayner, S. (2001). Self-perception. Ablex Publishinen
dcterms.referencesSaif, A. (2014). The relationship between self-efficacy, motivation, and academic achievement of undergraduate students in Yemen. Journal of Faculty of Education Assiut University, 30(1), 1–27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266326928_The_Relationship_between_selfefficacy_motivation_and_academic_achievement_of_undergraduate_students_in_Yemenen
dcterms.referencesSchunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3– 4), 207–231. https://wss.apan.org/jko/mls/Learning Content/schunk academic self efficacy.pdfen
dcterms.referencesSchunk, D. H., & Mullen, C. A. (2012). Self-efficacy as an engaged learner. In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 219– 235). Springer. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278715807_SelfEfficacy_as_an_Engaged_Learneren
dcterms.referencesTashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. (2007). The new era of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806293042en
dcterms.referencesTribble, C. (1996). Writing. Oxford University Press.en
dcterms.referencesVan Patten, B. (1990). Attending to content and forming the input: An experiment in consciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100009177en
dcterms.referencesWagenaar, A., Scherpbier, A., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2003). The importance of active involvement in learning: A qualitative study on learning results and learning processes in different traineeships. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 8(3), 201–212. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5414077_The_Importance_of_Active_Involveme nt_in_Learning_A_Qualitative_Study_on_Learning_Results_and_Learning_Processes_in_ Different_Traineeshipsen
dcterms.referencesWood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 361–384. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235360936_Social_Cognitive_Theory_of_Organi zational_Managementen
thesis.degree.disciplineFacultad de Educaciónes_CO
thesis.degree.levelMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigido (Virtual)es_CO
thesis.degree.nameMagíster en Didáctica del Inglés para el Aprendizaje Autodirigidoes_CO


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternacionalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional