%0 Generic
%A Benítes Rojas, Vicente F.
%8 2022
%@ 2359-5639
%U http://hdl.handle.net/10818/56193
%X Judicial invalidation of constitutional amendments has garnered the attention of scholars in the last few years.
Questions like whether and how a court should quash an amendment are at the forefront of contemporary com-
parative-constitutional-law and constitutional-theory inquiries. This excessive focus on annulment, however, has
neglected some other nonconventional forms of judicial involvement regarding amendments. Taking Colombia
as a case study, this article shows that the Constitutional Court has also had the power to initiate amendments,
define their content, rewrite their text, and promulgate them. As these novel judicial interventions that go be-
yond invalidation resemble the prerogatives commonly vested on the amendment power, this research terms
them ‘constitution-amending case law’, offers an indepth exploration of them, and proposes a typology
of such a jurisprudence
%I Revista de Investigações Consti- tucionais, Curitiba
%T Beyond Invalidation: Unorthodox Forms of Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments and Constitution-amending Case Law in Colombia
%R 10.5380/rinc.v9i2.86742
%~ Intellectum